Newsletter Archives
-
Bowman: Request clarification on the Surface Pro 4 return policy
Barb just posted a zinger on the Microsoft Answers forum:
I would like to ask for official clarification on the exchange policy for SP4. The last response does not seem to mirror the experience of customers.
She goes on to list replacement policies for flickergate, the battery bulge, and general return/exchange rules.
If you think that MS should clarify its return and exchange policy, drop by that Answers forum post and tell Microsoft “I have the same question.”
-
Microsoft finally stops screwing Surface Pro 4 flickergate victims
In a well-orchestrated Friday night news dump, Microsoft has announced a reversal in its years-long customer-antagonistic flickergate policy.
Flickergate, you may recall, is the propensity of some Surface Pro 4 machines to flicker violently. You can see the shake — dating back to March 6, 2016, mind you — in a YouTube video posted by Dmitriy1986.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk69BrQXxvg
Computerworld Woody on Windows.
P.S. I stand corrected. The press was notified around noon, Nashville time, on Friday. So it’s a Friday afternoon news dump.
-
Is Microsoft hinting that the Surface Pro 4 ‘flickergate’ is a hardware problem?
There’s a little bit of a breakthrough on the Microsoft Answers forum — not really a confession or a solution, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.
Some hope for a billion-dollar business.
Computerworld Woody on Windows.
-
Even more problems with Surface Pro 4 batteries and Surface TypeCovers
I’ve been covering “flickergate” since last April, and there’s still no resolution from Microsoft — in spite of a recent flare-up in tech blog coverage.
Now, even more complaints are circulating about dead batteries and bricked TypeCovers.
Computerworld Woody on Windows.