• WSRuff_Hi

    WSRuff_Hi

    @wsruff_hi

    Viewing 15 replies - 766 through 780 (of 828 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: Auto Skip Page Numbing (Word 2002 SP2) #747207

      Oh but you solution was so cool and the page break method is so, well, boring. Is there a way of flagging a page as ‘DO NOT PRINT’?

    • in reply to: Auto Skip Page Numbing (Word 2002 SP2) #746984

      Ok, great. That worked perfectly for the page number but it didn’t update the page number on the table of contents. Got an equally great suggestion for that one.

    • in reply to: Auto Skip Page Numbing (Word 2002 SP2) #746985

      Ok, great. That worked perfectly for the page number but it didn’t update the page number on the table of contents. Got an equally great suggestion for that one.

    • in reply to: 1-6 #739524

      1) no idea
      2) maybe later
      3) no idea
      4) who melts it, I drink it!
      5) I hope that no-one says that black and white are colours – black is a shade and white is a tint
      6) a murder of crows
      a parliament of owls
      a coven of witches
      a clutch of eggs
      a sheaf of arrows
      a bundle of rags

    • in reply to: 1-6 #739525

      1) no idea
      2) maybe later
      3) no idea
      4) who melts it, I drink it!
      5) I hope that no-one says that black and white are colours – black is a shade and white is a tint
      6) a murder of crows
      a parliament of owls
      a coven of witches
      a clutch of eggs
      a sheaf of arrows
      a bundle of rags

    • in reply to: Scroll back to Previous Web pages #726554

      WOW – a personal reply from woody – another thing gets ticked off my to-do list! Now all that I need to do re the lounge is to get a star post.

      Sure, mentioned me by name is fine and if you can include this web site (http://www.geocities.com/ruff_hi/%5B/url%5D – my home page), especially the part about how to make vegemite toast, that would be great.

      Thanks,

    • in reply to: Scroll back to Previous Web pages #726555

      WOW – a personal reply from woody – another thing gets ticked off my to-do list! Now all that I need to do re the lounge is to get a star post.

      Sure, mentioned me by name is fine and if you can include this web site (http://www.geocities.com/ruff_hi/%5B/url%5D – my home page), especially the part about how to make vegemite toast, that would be great.

      Thanks,

    • in reply to: How Many Outs? (2) #713842

      I’m real sorry I started this post now. Anyway, 10 looks correct to me. You even got two that I had missed (8 and 9).

      Well done. I suppose it really should be BATSPERSON!

    • in reply to: How Many Outs? (2) #713843

      I’m real sorry I started this post now. Anyway, 10 looks correct to me. You even got two that I had missed (8 and 9).

      Well done. I suppose it really should be BATSPERSON!

    • in reply to: How Many Outs? (1) #713836

      Great work. I had nine too but I missed the interference one.

      So, that leaves one more way of getting out. And the reason I started this silly puzzle is that I was called out for this reason on the weekend

    • in reply to: How Many Outs? (1) #713837

      Great work. I had nine too but I missed the interference one.

      So, that leaves one more way of getting out. And the reason I started this silly puzzle is that I was called out for this reason on the weekend

    • in reply to: How Many Outs? (1) #711698

      Ok, ground out is really a force out – so I would lump all of these into just one – FORCED OUT. So, ground out to pitcher and the second out in a double play is one – FORCE OUT! Same with a pick off and a caught stealing – these are both TAG OUT

    • in reply to: How Many Outs? (1) #711699

      Ok, ground out is really a force out – so I would lump all of these into just one – FORCED OUT. So, ground out to pitcher and the second out in a double play is one – FORCE OUT! Same with a pick off and a caught stealing – these are both TAG OUT

    • in reply to: Loading an Addin via Registry (Excel 2000 SP-3) #710754

      Ethan,

      You mention some knowledge base articles – which ones?

      Cheers

    • in reply to: Colourful Hats #707665

      Yeah – that is the answer but I’ve always had a problem with it. It assumes that person B is playing with a straight bat. What happens if person B really hates person A and, more that being first to annouce what colour hat they are wearing, they would perfer that person A got it wrong. In that case, it could go like this … person A is wearing a blue hat. Person B looks at A (sees blue), looks at C (sees red), waits until C doesn’t say anything, therefore concludes that they must be wearing red. THEN thinks, now if I pause, then person A will go though the logic you mentioned and annouce RED – oh how sweet that would be when they take off their hat and see blue. So … person B pauses and pauses … and BINGO!

      But wait, it gets worse, what if person C really hates person A and B!

    Viewing 15 replies - 766 through 780 (of 828 total)