• WSkwvh

    WSkwvh

    @wskwvh

    Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 432 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: Summing in the footer (97) #720800

      Simon,

      Thanks. I had not thought of the alternative to IIF for the two logical fields. duh.

      Do you have a suggestion for summing the following:
      =IIf(([M_logPersonal]=False And [M_logVacation]=True And [chkFMLA]=False And [M_logRestrictedDuty]=True) Or ([M_logPersonal]=False And [chkFMLA]=False And [M_logVacation]=True And [M_logOverAge]=True),True,False)

      NOTE: items prefaced with “M_” are fields in the query, items prefaced with “chk” are controls in the detail section of the report

    • in reply to: Assigning Global Values to variables (97/2k/XP) #717314

      Charlotte,

      Thanks for feedback.

      There are two Other tables involved:
      tblBiped
      pkey
      strSSN
      strcountry
      strH1
      strH2
      strH3
      dtmDOH
      dtmTerm

      tblOFI
      pkey
      fkey
      strOFINumber
      strSSN
      strH1
      strH2
      strH3
      dtmOFI

      The user(s) do(es) not see the underlying tables, just the data, presented in forms and reports. They can change the value of any of the three labels, and then run reports or open forms and instead of “strH1”, “strH2”, or “strH3” printing, it prints the corresponding value from the tblLabels table. The names “label1”, “label2”, “label3” from tblLabels.strName should more appropriately have been named H1, H2, and H3, but this is an inherited project. There is probably a better way, but for now I am stuck with what I have. There about 20 folks using the existing version, and they want additional reports and forms. Ultimately it will be rewritten from scratch, with better practices and conventions, but initially I need to meet their immediate needs with minimal programming on our part (that is create reports and forms for the users using existing structures).

      Does this make sense, or have I muddied the water?

      Thanks for all your help. In addition to being brilliant, you are a kind person!

      Ken

    • in reply to: Assigning Global Values to variables (97/2k/XP) #717315

      Charlotte,

      Thanks for feedback.

      There are two Other tables involved:
      tblBiped
      pkey
      strSSN
      strcountry
      strH1
      strH2
      strH3
      dtmDOH
      dtmTerm

      tblOFI
      pkey
      fkey
      strOFINumber
      strSSN
      strH1
      strH2
      strH3
      dtmOFI

      The user(s) do(es) not see the underlying tables, just the data, presented in forms and reports. They can change the value of any of the three labels, and then run reports or open forms and instead of “strH1”, “strH2”, or “strH3” printing, it prints the corresponding value from the tblLabels table. The names “label1”, “label2”, “label3” from tblLabels.strName should more appropriately have been named H1, H2, and H3, but this is an inherited project. There is probably a better way, but for now I am stuck with what I have. There about 20 folks using the existing version, and they want additional reports and forms. Ultimately it will be rewritten from scratch, with better practices and conventions, but initially I need to meet their immediate needs with minimal programming on our part (that is create reports and forms for the users using existing structures).

      Does this make sense, or have I muddied the water?

      Thanks for all your help. In addition to being brilliant, you are a kind person!

      Ken

    • in reply to: Delete Query (97) #717160

      John,

      Thanks! I will give it test!

      Ken

    • in reply to: Delete Query (97) #717161

      John,

      Thanks! I will give it test!

      Ken

    • in reply to: Delete Query (97) #714125

      Although there must be a cleaner and kewler way of deleting these records, I ended up using an update query and then a delete query. I added a field to the first table, updated the new field with string if it was to be deleted, then ran a delete query for all records that contained that string.

    • in reply to: Delete Query (97) #714126

      Although there must be a cleaner and kewler way of deleting these records, I ended up using an update query and then a delete query. I added a field to the first table, updated the new field with string if it was to be deleted, then ran a delete query for all records that contained that string.

    • in reply to: Delete Query (97) #714014

      Patt,

      Thanks. I tried setting the relationship to the foreign key field (recordnumber) with no success. I even used a make table query to create a table of the records needing to be deleted, then create a delete query using the newly created table and the tblPayments table, relating to the pkey (a primary field) in both, and continue to get the same error. gggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! !!

    • in reply to: Delete Query (97) #714024

      Patt,

      Thanks. I tried setting the relationship to the foreign key field (recordnumber) with no success. I even used a make table query to create a table of the records needing to be deleted, then create a delete query using the newly created table and the tblPayments table, relating to the pkey (a primary field) in both, and continue to get the same error. gggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! !!

    • in reply to: Word To HTML To Access (XP) #713621

      Jerry,

      thanks for you help. Unfortunately, some of their notes exceeded what Excel can handle in a single cell. So I just wrote this off as a learning experience, and hope they use Access, or Excel, instead of Word for these types of applications in the future.

      We did play with replacing the carriage returns with a series of characters (i.e. “uuuuuuu” in Word) and then replacing the string with a carriage return, but too proved cumbersome, and slow.

      Some folks think that because they have something in their computer, they have “automated” their office. Funny how sometimes, all this “automation” results in more work instead of less. On a positive note, at least they are not afraid of the technology and are pushing their envelops and trying to improve. Ya gotta love it!

      Ken

    • in reply to: Word To HTML To Access (XP) #713622

      Jerry,

      thanks for you help. Unfortunately, some of their notes exceeded what Excel can handle in a single cell. So I just wrote this off as a learning experience, and hope they use Access, or Excel, instead of Word for these types of applications in the future.

      We did play with replacing the carriage returns with a series of characters (i.e. “uuuuuuu” in Word) and then replacing the string with a carriage return, but too proved cumbersome, and slow.

      Some folks think that because they have something in their computer, they have “automated” their office. Funny how sometimes, all this “automation” results in more work instead of less. On a positive note, at least they are not afraid of the technology and are pushing their envelops and trying to improve. Ya gotta love it!

      Ken

    • in reply to: Word To HTML To Access (XP) #713617

      Charlotte,

      Thanks once again. I shall assign them punishwork, just like in school, and have them practice:

      “Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,I shall never use Word as a database,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,I shall never use Word as a database, I shall never use Word as a database,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,I shall never use Word as a database, I shall never use Word as a database,I shall never use Word as a database, I shall never use Word as a database”

      until they “get it”.

      FYI – I went ahead and imported it via HTML, and they will use today as their start off with Access, and then clean up the memos on as as needed basis.

      thanks,

      Ken

    • in reply to: Word To HTML To Access (XP) #713618

      Charlotte,

      Thanks once again. I shall assign them punishwork, just like in school, and have them practice:

      “Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,I shall never use Word as a database,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,I shall never use Word as a database, I shall never use Word as a database,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab, Cntrl-V,Cntrl-C, Alt-Tab,I shall never use Word as a database, I shall never use Word as a database,I shall never use Word as a database, I shall never use Word as a database”

      until they “get it”.

      FYI – I went ahead and imported it via HTML, and they will use today as their start off with Access, and then clean up the memos on as as needed basis.

      thanks,

      Ken

    • in reply to: An index thing (97) #711976

      Charlotte,

      duh, sorry. Had tunnel vision and a bf at the same time.

      thanks!

      Ke

    • in reply to: An index thing (97) #711977

      Charlotte,

      duh, sorry. Had tunnel vision and a bf at the same time.

      thanks!

      Ke

    Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 432 total)