• WSjha900

    WSjha900

    @wsjha900

    Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 324 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: Formula to pull top 5 numbers (Excel 2003) #996749

      ok, thank you very much. I have it all working, see attached. I’ve given up on the Xcelsius tool, it keeps bombing so now i am trying to design a form in vba.

      How do I control the Chart on the UserForm1? I want the user to be able to choose an item from the listbox (choose up to 5) and then have the chart show them the results (like on Chart1) chartsheet. Would this be the best way for the user to see the results of their choice in a chart format? How do I manipulate the chart control on the form? Thank you.

    • in reply to: Formula to pull top 5 numbers (Excel 2003) #996600

      This works perfectly, but there is a twist here. I am using a product called Xcelsius that uses underlying Excel files. I linked this worksheet to Xcelsius and it bombed so I called the vendor and they said they do not support the Row Excel function. Therefore, is there another way to do this without using Row?

    • in reply to: Formula to pull top 5 numbers (Excel 2003) #996547

      I’ve worked out this way of doing it. Is there a way to add formulas (perhaps vlookup) to A1:B5 so that if a number is entered in B6 that represents one of the 5 categories, that the top 5 of that cat/column will be displayed in A1:B5?

    • in reply to: Formula to pull top 5 numbers (Excel 2003) #996541

      No, they are not unique. They are percentages that could be duplicated.

    • in reply to: Formula to pull top 5 numbers (Excel 2003) #996538

      ok, thank you.

      Also, i now realize I have to pull the matching text in COL A that goes with the highest number. So if Red is 99% and falls in B47, then B1 will have 99% in it. How can I get A1 to have the word Red in it?

    • in reply to: macro to move line (Excel 2003) #996309

      yes, it worked perfectly. Thank you very much.

    • in reply to: macro to move line (Excel 2003) #995324

      oops

    • in reply to: New graph instead of a Venn (office 2002, 2003) #994809

      When I enter

      A (NOT 100,000
      A and B 50,000
      B (NOT A) 50,000

      It seems like the right circle should be 66.7% (B=100,000) of the size of the left circle since A=150,000. The right circle is a lot larger than 67% of the left circle. How are the circle sizes calculated? thank you for the help.

    • in reply to: New graph instead of a Venn (office 2002, 2003) #993508

      clapping

      You are too kind!

    • in reply to: New graph instead of a Venn (office 2002, 2003) #993085

      oh my goodness. This is TOOOO wonderful.

      Is there a way it can be changed to keep them perfect circles? When i use

      5,006,000
      18,727,000
      6,905,000

      the circles come out round. When i use
      8,749,000
      5,544,000
      3,162,000

      they are oblong.

      I’ve looked everywhere for a solution like this. I can’t believe all the calculations. I would love to do circles but may switched to stacked bars to keep it simple since i have to do 30 of them. Thank you so much.

    • in reply to: New graph instead of a Venn (office 2002, 2003) #991636

      I did read the old posts but completely missed your sample. I have 30 venns with only 2 circles. I tried to modify for 2 cicles but frankly got lost. Can you help me? thanks

    • in reply to: New graph instead of a Venn (office 2002, 2003) #991506

      yes, it is a good way but there is no automated way to make the 2 circles propotionate and data labels to appear in the center of the 2 circles in addition to the “overlapped” section. I have to do 30 of them a month and want to automatically make them. Is the stacked bar the best 2nd choice? thanks

    • in reply to: Change textbox depth in ppt (PPT 2003) #988717

      i changed to
      shp.height = 320 and shp.height = 54 and now it works. go figure

    • in reply to: Change textbox depth in ppt (PPT 2003) #988716

      thank you very much. Seems like it should work but it’s not finding them. The textbox is 4.45″ height with a width of 7.11″. I changed the code to 4.45 instead of 4.75 but it still doesn’t find them.

    • in reply to: Excel 2002 on win98 (winxp, office 2003) #985162

      The delimited file that is being converted does have the word “base” in it. It runs fine on my pc with win xp and excel 2003 sp2. When it runs on her pc it gets that type 9 error. She has office 2002 on windows 98. I was wondering if there are differences in excel 2002 to excel 2003 like the colorindex property, the pagebreak property constants, for maybe the border type constants (xlEdgeLeft etc).

    Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 324 total)