• WSCD-Freak

    WSCD-Freak

    @wscd-freak

    Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: UEFI Bios: GUID partition table support under Win 7 x64 #1303135

      Thanks, CLiNT. I now know how to install Win 7 via UEFI boot but looked for a trick to switch the partition style to GUID on a PC, which was set up the conventional way w/o lhaving to re-install the OS and all applications.

    • in reply to: UEFI Bios: GUID partition table support under Win 7 x64 #1303131

      Not sure what the question is exactly but GUID refers to the disk only. So is it a MBR disk and you want to convert it to GUID?

      Thanks for your quick reply.

      Exactly. The store were I bought the PCs pre-installed Win 7 for test purposes and I’d already installed a bunch of applications before I learned about the alternate method to set up Win 7 via the UEFI Bios. There’s no problem at the moment because all HDDs have 2 TB only. But in the future I may need to use larger HDDs and would hate to do all the work to configure the PCs again.

    • I’ve used Directory Opus 10 ( http://www.gpsoft.com.au/ ) for several years. It’s the best ……
      It’s not free but definately worth the price.

      Once or twice a year the English version of Directory Opus is available at BitsDuJour with a 50% discount.

    • in reply to: The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer #1298454

      Put a “” after drivers, and look in a subfolder called “etc”.

      Oops, [shame] I relied on Total Commander’s search engine. It does not find the file with “hosts” or “hosts.* as search string, I tested it again a few seconds ago. Strange….

      Thanks a lot!

    • in reply to: The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer #1298401

      After reading this article I successfully write-protected the hosts file on a PC with XP as OS. But on my other PC, running under WIN 7 Ultimate 64bit I can’t find any sub dir driversetc or a “hosts” – file anywhere. The OS is configured to show all hidden files. Any suggestions? Thanks!

    • in reply to: What happened to multitasking? Large copy/paste #1267984

      Maybe the problem is caused by Word, not by the clipboard or the swapfile. It may depend from what you copied. 120 pages text only do not require so much RAM. The whole bible (AT + NT) needs approx. 1 MB. But if you copied text + images things look different. WinWord is well known to have strange problems with larger blocks of text + images.
      Sorry, English is not my mother tongue 😉

    Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)