• WSBodders

    WSBodders

    @wsbodders

    Viewing 5 replies - 166 through 170 (of 170 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: SQL Alias (A97 SR2) #531631

      Charlotte

      Your reply seems to have got lost, but here’s some more info :

      My SQL was :

      SELECT Sectors.TechLogNumber AS TLP,
      tblAircraft.Registration AS Reg,
      Sectors.[Actual Departure Date] AS [Date],
      [Sectors]![Departure Airport] & “-” & [Sectors]![Arrival Airport] AS Route
      FROM tblAircraft …etc

      In the comboBox header, the 2nd column appeared as “Aircraft Registration”, which is the Caption field in tblAircraft for field Registration, and not as “Reg”, which was what I wanted to see.

      HTH

      Nick

    • in reply to: Report emails Received #527341

      Not quite. I have several levels of folders & I keep them in collapsed view, because if I expanded them all, it would take up most of the screen. Also, if the Rule moves the email to a sub-folder, only the sub-folder appears in bold, not its parent folder. It’s not a show-stopper, but it is an annoyance.

    • in reply to: Use of memory #524260

      I thought that Access only stored the actual number of characters in the text field. The actual length of the field is stored as a 1-byte overhead. So the maximum length is an indicator only.

    • in reply to: Type library version problem #514365

      Bart

      I did indeed try out DAW’s tip. I imported all the objects into a new database, re-compiled & re-installed. On the test PC it came up with run-time error 3071 “The expression is typed incorrectly, or it is too complex to be evaluated”. The problem is still with the original query. Here’s the SQL for it :

      SELECT DISTINCTROW tblUpdate.Updated, tblUpdate.Day
      FROM tblUpdate
      WHERE (((tblUpdate.Day)=format(Now(),”dd-mmm-yyyy”)));

      The ‘funny’ thing is the app works perfectly on a PC where Access 97 has already been installed. It’s these little things that really make your day, don’t they ? (Not)

      Nick

    • in reply to: Type library version problem #514347

      Thanks, but I’ve already been down that route. The wizard shows all references are fine.

    Viewing 5 replies - 166 through 170 (of 170 total)