• mn–

    mn--

    @mn

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 1,544 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: USB Mouse Causes Laptop Black Screen #2346025

      Bad mouse or adapter is of course possible.

      I have one wired USB mouse that’d cause various kinds of issues on Windows and Linux both, Linux would eventually crash after enough USB error messages in the kernel log, and I think Windows did get at least black screens. Tested on several different computers, on USB 2 and 3 version ports, with and without a hub between it and the computer…

      Specifically, it’s in my electronics disposal bin, waiting for that to become full.

    • in reply to: Can a swapfile be put on an SD card? #2345868

      I suggest using the SD card for data and leaving the swapfile on the SSD.

      That’s almost always the better choice if it’s available.

    • in reply to: Can a swapfile be put on an SD card? #2345856

      I expect this should be possible. It probably shows as /dev/mmcblk… something and we’ve got a couple of devices in the house that have swap on a mmcblk device, though only the Raspberry Pi one is removable.

      However, I often find that slotted mmcblk speeds are rather lower than they “should” be… in many computers the card slot is just slow, and reliability problems are common too, either of which would severely hinder using it for swap. Though I suppose if there ever was a brand name that I’d expect good SD-slot performance from, Sony would be it.

      Also the filesystem type of your SD card might be meaningful. Swap to a file on ExFAT or NTFS might not work, and old-style FAT has that file size limit… Linux has no problems with partitions on SD cards so, depends on if you want to use that card with other systems too? I’d probably use a swap partition if not.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Glacially slow, 10-minute boot times! #2345557

      My “favorite” boot time prolonger is still an intermittent short on a disk shelf’s address line.

      It’s something that doesn’t happen on low-impact systems like workstations because those don’t have lots of disks, so it’s never a “common” fault… server (with a storage role) only, with the usual uptime demands. Also it might look like it “works now” after it comes up, but with a constant background high risk of data corruption.

    • in reply to: Outlook Sub-Folder Deletion #2345555

      Went on to the email server using a different computer and did not see the sub-folder chaos that I have in Outlook 2016.

      Oh, well then it’s pretty weird if the web interface was showing them… given you already tried to delete them from a web thing?

      Without that part I’d have thought it just an Outlook problem. I’ve seen some pretty weird symptoms from Outlook client-side errors but…

    • in reply to: Trying Linux on your Windows system #2345295

      Dave Cutler’s kernel (originally on DEC, then resurrected as Windows NT) was and is the best virtual memory system ever developed, bar none.

      It does have some downsides too. One being the file locking paradigm (yes, it’s tightly coupled to the virtual memory) that seems to be one of the several reasons why updates are such a bother on Windows. Might be fixable though.

      I’m of the opinion that the optimal virtual memory system depends very much on the workload, anyway. But that’s after having been around some high-availability hard-realtime setups that had very different load patterns from average general-purpose computing…

    • in reply to: Glacially slow, 10-minute boot times! #2345265

      Eh, 10 minutes isn’t all that bad.

      Certain kinds of problems on a server can make it take literally hours to boot up. BTDT, eventually found the faulty piece of hardware and replaced it.

    • in reply to: Outlook Sub-Folder Deletion #2345263

      We have also tried to delete the folders from our email providers web site with no luck.

      This looks like a possible server-side issue, then.

      Could be a server bug, a configuration error (permissions), or a particularly weird “feature”. Seen all three.

      May need to talk to the server admins (as in your mail provider’s backend technical folks) to get it fixed.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Trying Linux on your Windows system #2344776

      How much of that is related to secure boot?

      Oh, that was all without going into the Secure Boot hassle at all.

      Which is another apparently good idea but the implementation leaves a lot to be desired.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Trying Linux on your Windows system #2344762

      There’s an overview at the usual place – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface

      Then there’s a security / threat analysis paper over at https://schd.ws/hosted_files/osseu17/84/Replace%20UEFI%20with%20Linux.pdf that refers to several of the details. (Along with SMM and Management Engine issues.)

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Trying Linux on your Windows system #2344748

      (digressing on to UEFI)

      How exactly is it unforgiving?

      Essentially, it’s just too complex to unscramble if something unexpected happens to it.

      Well, first there’s the UEFI non-volatile memory… which is essentially opaque and once something gets there, removing it can be very difficult. And aside from exploits, even honest errors have the capability of essentially making UEFI fail to run itself.

      So yeah, a random device driver updater probably has the capability to permanently brick UEFI-enabled motherboards.

      Then there’s all the extensions loaded from elsewhere… like the system partition on disk… which can become resident in memory and change important things in the system. Failure to copy one of those when replacing a disk is one place where hard-to-trace issues can come from. Also this can happen when disks are just reordered if you have multiple with EFI partitions, and this in turn can happen when motherboard firmware changes…

      And then there’s the actual boot process itself. Any number of devices have a nonstandard UEFI boot process, so using the UEFI standard interfaces to set your boot path is not reliable. And again this is firmware version dependent and can also be permanently changed in non-volatile memory by device driver installers…

      So yeah. Any number of possible situations that can only be fixed by reflashing your motherboard’s non-volatile memory in an external device and wiping the EFI system partitions on any disks, and that in turn may also cause things to break. Anyone want to count how many current motherboards have that chip socketed versus soldered in, anyway?

      And then there’s all the gymnastics you have to do to make boot from software RAID work in a sane way on UEFI. What usually happens is that you rely on nonstandard manufacturer-specific firmware and drivers to work with that (making it a “fakeraid”), and that in turn is vulnerable to incompatible updates in the boot code that go in the ESP… was a spectacular self-wipe on that one server once. (Windows Server 2016, if anyone’s interested.)

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Trying Linux on your Windows system #2344712

      (U)EFI is very unforgiving, period… all kinds of “fun” with it on Itanium. (I used to be a HP-UX admin.)

      not mature – few drivers, even at this late stage.

      As far as operating systems go, driver support has nothing to do with maturity. Some of the most “mature” operating systems are those with the least driver support for random hardware. Take (Open)VMS for example…

      Linux is for extreme tinkerers. it is NOT for folks who just like things to run. … Just don’t fantasize that you can replace windows with it – 98% can’t.

      Eh, multibooting different operating systems is for tinkerers, unless done as a fallback recovery only.

      I have several examples of people who have indeed switched to Linux, at various points. All it takes is some planning.

    • in reply to: Trouble with .webm files #2344650

      I’m mostly saving the instrucctional videos off YouTube, so I have no idea what compression is used.

      At least you can check the codec. VLC’s Tools menu should have a media info tool, for example (hotkey Ctrl-I for me).

      My computer is about 5 years old (bought used, so I don’t know its actual age) but I have no idea whether that affects anything.

      Might, if it’s the hardware acceleration that’s limiting things. That’s more about the GPU and drivers than CPU. (Mine was also bought used a few years ago, seems to be a 2012 model, but has a Quadro GPU…)

      You could try changing those settings in VLC and see if that changes anything. And if it does, even if you can’t get acceptable playback speeds without HW accel but do get seeking, well, then I might try a different graphics driver version…

      Let’s see if I can attach screengrabs of the mediainfo and preferences dialogs… there?

    • in reply to: Forward email without vertical bars #2344454

      Forwarding is actually just sending again, on the technical side. No reason why you can’t remove any parts, it’ll only be detectable if the content is signed. (As in cryptographically or with an out-of-band checking method.)

      Do you mean you have vertical bars added when forwarding? I don’t actually get any such when I forward things, but I don’t usually use the Gmail web interface much… hm… let’s see…

      … yeah, went to the web interface, forwarded one mail from my Gmail mailbox to a non-Gmail mailbox, no extra vertical bars around when it got there. Though I might have non-default settings in there…

    • in reply to: Trouble with .webm files #2344395

      I use Firefox and Windows 10 version 1909. I play videos with the VLC media player. Is it me, or are these frustrations inherent in the webm format?

      Not inherent in the container format, I’m able to seek with fine granularity in a .webm file.

      But… I only tested one file (VP9/Opus), and there are more encoding variations possible. Not sure if going for max compression in VP8 would limit seeking, for example.

      It could also be that your hardware acceleration for the video has limitations. I remember that having been the case on older hardware with h264, too…

      Also I’m on Linux (Xubuntu 18.04 with a bunch of outside repositories).

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 1,544 total)