• Yet Another Sequence

    Home » Forums » Outside the box » Fun Stuff » Yet Another Sequence

    Author
    Topic
    WSbandido
    AskWoody Lounger
    October 4, 2004 at 5:57 pm #410713

    Provide the next number in the following sequence.

    1 3 4 5 7 8 9 ?

    Reply | Quote
    Viewing 8 reply threads
    Author
    Replies
    • WSsmerdonk
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 4, 2004 at 6:30 pm #884757

      11 ?

      Reply | Quote
      • WSbandido
        AskWoody Lounger
        October 4, 2004 at 6:33 pm #884758

        I can see where you’re coming from, Kevin but incorrect.

        Reply | Quote
      • WSbandido
        AskWoody Lounger
        October 4, 2004 at 6:33 pm #884759

        I can see where you’re coming from, Kevin but incorrect.

        Reply | Quote
    • WSRudi
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 5, 2004 at 7:07 am #885037

      1 ?, assuming there are only 10 digits!
      PS, interesting new user pic! – what is the significance?

      Reply | Quote
    • WSRudi
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 5, 2004 at 7:07 am #885038

      1 ?, assuming there are only 10 digits!
      PS, interesting new user pic! – what is the significance?

      Reply | Quote
    • WSRudi
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 5, 2004 at 1:16 pm #885186

      How about 8

      Reply | Quote
      • WSbandido
        AskWoody Lounger
        October 5, 2004 at 4:37 pm #885302

        Nope. Once you see the pattern, you will be certain.

        Hint: If you cannot find a mathematical pattern, there probably isn’t one.

        Reply | Quote
      • WSbandido
        AskWoody Lounger
        October 5, 2004 at 4:37 pm #885303

        Nope. Once you see the pattern, you will be certain.

        Hint: If you cannot find a mathematical pattern, there probably isn’t one.

        Reply | Quote
    • WSRudi
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 5, 2004 at 1:16 pm #885187

      How about 8

      Reply | Quote
    • WSbandido
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 13, 2004 at 4:40 pm #888022

      No more takers for this one? I must have Irritable Vowel Syndrome! groan

      Reply | Quote
    • WSbandido
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 13, 2004 at 4:40 pm #888023

      No more takers for this one? I must have Irritable Vowel Syndrome! groan

      Reply | Quote
    • WSLawS
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 13, 2004 at 4:53 pm #888033

      How about 12, 22 ?

      Reply | Quote
      • WSbandido
        AskWoody Lounger
        October 13, 2004 at 5:09 pm #888037

        Loren Ann,

        Brilliant. clever I wonder if anyone else will supply the 9 remaining numbers to complete the sequence?

        Reply | Quote
        • WSrory
          AskWoody Lounger
          October 14, 2004 at 11:38 am #888217

          I take it I’m barking up the wrong tree as I would have completed the sequence with 12, 22, 26, 32, 36, 40, 52, 56, 62, 66, 70, 80, 90?

          Reply | Quote
          • WSRudi
            AskWoody Lounger
            October 14, 2004 at 1:20 pm #888232

            I must be bash… but this is just a bunch of random numbers to me. I eyeout no sequence question
            Could just as well be 12, 22, 32, 42, 52, 62, 72, 81, 90.5….…Just having fun with those last 2 laugh

            Reply | Quote
            • WSrory
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 14, 2004 at 1:37 pm #888236

              There is a sequence (more than one if my answer is incorrect) but as Rob said, it’s not really a mathematical one.

              Reply | Quote
            • WSbandido
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 14, 2004 at 7:03 pm #888272

              If I said forty-two instead of forty , would that make sense? The rest fit my pattern. clapping

              Reply | Quote
            • WSrory
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 15, 2004 at 9:37 am #888356

              blushI plead lack of coffee as my defence for the typo which led me to include 40. Should indeed be 42 and 46. That’s even more than 9 additional though?

              Reply | Quote
            • WSrory
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 15, 2004 at 9:37 am #888357

              blushI plead lack of coffee as my defence for the typo which led me to include 40. Should indeed be 42 and 46. That’s even more than 9 additional though?

              Reply | Quote
            • WSHansV
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 15, 2004 at 10:38 am #888368

              As you know, forty-two is the answer to everything…

              Reply | Quote
            • WSHansV
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 15, 2004 at 10:38 am #888369

              As you know, forty-two is the answer to everything…

              Reply | Quote
            • WSbandido
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 15, 2004 at 6:09 pm #888509

              Now where have I heard that before question wink

              Reply | Quote
            • WSbandido
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 15, 2004 at 6:09 pm #888510

              Now where have I heard that before question wink

              Reply | Quote
            • WSbandido
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 14, 2004 at 7:03 pm #888273

              If I said forty-two instead of forty , would that make sense? The rest fit my pattern. clapping

              Reply | Quote
            • WSrory
              AskWoody Lounger
              October 14, 2004 at 1:37 pm #888237

              There is a sequence (more than one if my answer is incorrect) but as Rob said, it’s not really a mathematical one.

              Reply | Quote
          • WSRudi
            AskWoody Lounger
            October 14, 2004 at 1:20 pm #888233

            I must be bash… but this is just a bunch of random numbers to me. I eyeout no sequence question
            Could just as well be 12, 22, 32, 42, 52, 62, 72, 81, 90.5….…Just having fun with those last 2 laugh

            Reply | Quote
        • WSrory
          AskWoody Lounger
          October 14, 2004 at 11:38 am #888218

          I take it I’m barking up the wrong tree as I would have completed the sequence with 12, 22, 26, 32, 36, 40, 52, 56, 62, 66, 70, 80, 90?

          Reply | Quote
      • WSbandido
        AskWoody Lounger
        October 13, 2004 at 5:09 pm #888038

        Loren Ann,

        Brilliant. clever I wonder if anyone else will supply the 9 remaining numbers to complete the sequence?

        Reply | Quote
    • WSLawS
      AskWoody Lounger
      October 13, 2004 at 4:53 pm #888034

      How about 12, 22 ?

      Reply | Quote
    Viewing 8 reply threads
    Reply To: Yet Another Sequence

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




DON'T MISS OUT!
Subscribe to the Free Newsletter
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address

View the Forum

  • Recent Replies
  • My Replies
  • My Active Topics
  • New Posts in the Last day
  • Private Messages
  • Knowledge Base
  • How to use the Forums
  • All Forums

    • Recent Topics

    My Profile

    April 2025
    S M T W T F S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  

    Remembering Woody

     

    Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.

    Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
    Mastodon profile for AskWoody

     

    Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
    Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts

    Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.