• The state of Windows 11

    Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » The state of Windows 11

    Author
    Topic
    #2727868

    ISSUE 21.52 • 2024-12-23 WINDOWS 11 By Lance Whitney With Windows 11 now three years old, where does it stand today? I’ve been running Windows 11 almo
    [See the full post at: The state of Windows 11]

    12 users thanked author for this post.
    Viewing 55 reply threads
    Author
    Replies
    • #2727878

      You end the article with “And what about the future?”. That’s something I would like to know for a long time. I’ve been searching for ‘Windows roadmap’ and it shows up some maps, but they are old. So I asked Copilot. It shows a list of features. No Big Plan. Strange. There must be a plan? Or is Microsoft flying by the seat of their pants?

    • #2727883

      I am a senior citizen, living on a fixed income, with a PC that cannot upgrade to Windows 11 due to many incompatibilities. Buying a new PC is not something in the budget so my Windows 10 desktop will have to chug along until it becomes problematic with usage. Microsoft has really done a disservice to seniors who are in the same boat as I am by not offering any realistic option when October 2025 comes around. The horrible inflation of the last 4 years has devastated my finances where just keeping the utilities paid, the rent current and putting food on the table and gas in the car is all I can do and all I can do is hope the next 4 years will offer some relief, but I am not hopeful for the short term and the October 2025 date will be here before we know it. It would be nice if Microsoft would offer the extended patch program to seniors free of charge or some drastically reduced rate as some kind of compassionate program, but I am not holding my breath.

      • #2728291

        I agree completely! Windows 11 is a cruel joke, as far as I’m concerned. I do use nor want any of the “so-called new features”! Microsoft seems to delight in moving various menus to new and obscure places, requiring much time to locate and use. Yes, I use Win11 on a new portable, grudgingly for sure. My other two Intel I7 machines run Win 10 and, yes, old Win 7 respectively. The pre Win 11 PC’s run quite well, thank you. When it becomes impossible to use the older Windows versions, I plan to transition to a Linus flavor.

        RN

    • #2727887

      I’m definitely not a computer geek and ,even tho unsupported , still run and thoroughly enjoy Win 7. I’m retired and don’t need every new thing under the sun. MS is just a company who needs to roll out new things in order to make money. They are working for them, not the consumer

      4 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727897

      Personally, I’m about fed up with Microsoft and am currently considering moving totally to Linux.
      John

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727907

      I have two recent PCs which run Windows 11. One of them started its life under Windows 10. Both run pro, Version 23H2, per Susan Bradley’s recommendation.

      I have found that the interface of Windows 11 needed some adjustments to be truly useful, but I have not engaged in wholesale replacement of the Start Menu or anything else too radical. Copilot is a nonstarter for me, and not because of privacy issues. I do not use voice control and unless I were to suffer an injury or disability I don’t imagine ever liking the prospect of using my voice to control any of my tech.

      I have seen driver issues, Secure Boot issues and other Windows Security issues in Windows 11, and some of these are really annoying. But no deal-breakers so far.

      I do use AI when it is well integrated into the task at hand. This includes Google Gemini as it is implemented in Google Search these days. I do not imagine buying my next PC with the thought of using local AI as a major consideration. There may be an NPU and a discrete GPU in my next computer, but Copilot will not be the reason driving this decision.

      Overall, Windows 11 does seem to have the features and performance I like to have in my daily use operating system. But I find there are enough annoyances and bugs, and some outright failures of design, to keep me interested in running Linux as my daily driver workhorse OS. It seems, except for remote meetings, almost every task can be done faster and more efficiently with Linux than with Windows. I felt this way even with Windows 10. (And don’t get me started about Windows 8.0, which is the version which drove me over to Linux in the first place.)

      -- rc primak

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727914

      My heartburn with Windows 11 has to do with the cost to replace my Dell Precision T5810 tower with 10-core Xeon, 64GB of memory, two SSDs and TPM 2.0, of course. Instantaneous response except for lag from the internet.  Why heartburn?

      1. Arbitrary line between qualified for Windows 11 and not qualified.
      2. Microsoft claimed that systems with older CPUs like mine would experience a deterioration in performance, but never provided any metrics to quantify the slowdown.
      3. I have serious doubts that my system would have a perceptible slowdown, unless somehow the 10 cores and 20 threads would be underutilized.
      4. Even so, I could upgrade inexpensively with an 18-core Xeon and more memory, 192GB max.
      5. The Precision T5810 is a rock for reliability.  I have clients running them in server rooms, with Linux serving up VMs.

      In short, the Windows 11 hardware line-in-the-sand was a back room deal among Microsoft, Intel, AMD, Dell, Lenovo, HP and other major players to push new products, and it succeeded during the annual two-month Black Friday event of 2021.  Gaming and supposed advanced security helped push the sales back then.  Since then, reaction to Windows 11 has been “Meh!”

      The Windows 11 UI imposes extra keystrokes and clicks compared to Windows 10.  Why is it that it is faster f0r me to type the name of a program in the search bar than to click the start menu and navigate through clicks and scroll movements to find the name of the program I want to run.  Such improvements!  I now habitually type program names into the Windows 10 search bar, too.  Ah, the lost wonder of the Windows 7 start button to choose programs to run.

      I am not sure, because I was not 100% successful, but installing 24H2 from a customized Rufus USB stick still forced me into a Microsoft account.  If I ever have the free time, I’ll investigate further. In the meantime, 23H2 can still be set up with a local account.  Forcing people to have a Microsoft account is ever so much like MacOS.

       

      4 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727916

      If m$ would push out a Win11 light of older machines, then they would have had 100% acceptance.  Obviously, they chose not to make such machines officially upgradeable even though you can cheat the upgrade.   Only question I have for those that cheated is, will m$ muck up those installs after next years deadline to upgrade.   Even so, my daily driver is an upgraded Minisforum (originally had Win10; only a few months ago did I actually upgrade it).   Try to boot up my old machine once a month to update it, but have to admit it’s been 2 months since I turned the machine on.   lol

      Even so, would like my backup to be compliant, so if any developers from m$ are listening, please either officially compromise and allow old machines to be upgraded or release a win11 light for those said old machines.   If a machine can run Win10, there should be no real reason (other than greed) for such machines to run Win11, imo.    🙂

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2727922

        You could also say that the hardware limitations of Windows 11 are anti-competitive and that the DOJ should include that as part of its investigation into Microsoft’s actions.

        1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2727920

      My annoyances with Windows 11 start with my choices of default apps. It is like anytime I restart my computer, the OS steps in and changes my browser and pdf apps from my choices to Edge and Edge. I have provided Microsoft with feedback. I’m at a point where I am seeing if I can file a complaint with the Department of Justice because as far as I am concerned these changes to Microsoft’s choices are anti-competitive in nature and should be investigated as such.

      I also do not like the use of symbols/icons instead of words in File Explorer. The fact that not only did the words go away, their position is changed to where I must look elsewhere. That is bad especially since my work computer and my other home computers are Windows 10. That makes the switching back and forth very frustrating. I am not looking forward to when my work computer goes to Windows 11 as I likely won’t be able to add the tweaking software that corrects the start menu and File Explorer.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2727921

      Windows 10 ESR.  That’s going to be my solution for now.

      As far as I’m concerned, MS can get stuffed.  I’m not throwing out a couple of perfectly good 4 year old computers just because Microsoft wants me to.   And Linux on them is not an option.  Not for the work I have to do.

       

      3 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727929

      Mr. Whitney, I wish to take the ‘Devil’s Advocate’ side of this issue. Not that I think MS is great, but an opposing point of consideration. The issues your article mentioned were mostly caused by 3rd party apps and NOT the OS itself. When the “end user” has an issue with a computer, he blames the OS immediately and does not consider what they did that may have caused the issue in the first place. Conversely, the Apple OS has been considered far more stable and the Apple products far superior to the MS products. The issue is, the Apple OS requires only Apple approved apps and typically does not play well with others. Due to computers changing and the technologies going forward, MS may be attempting to bring everyone into the 21st century to help with in this respect. While MS could have done things a bit different and not ruffled so many feathers, it may be time to cut them a bit of slack and update the old to newer technologies. Just like Apple has done and forced on people since the invention of the iPod.

      • #2728009

        Interesting — I was just coming in to offer a viewpoint almost 180° from yours!

        I think that much of the problem is that Microsoft is trying to be too  much like Apple, with everything getting baked into the OS.  If they would limit Windows to being the operating system, with the basic interface necessary to do anything with it, I don’t think we’d be seeing nearly as many issues.

        I know I’m oversimplifying, because I’m not and never have been a systems-level programmer (almost, but not quite).  It does seem to me, though, that less direct access to the system itself and more control through the use of APIs — with a standard set of parameters in and out, like subroutines in a program — should greatly reduce the number of ways for third-party applications to go bonkers due to OS changes or to create havoc on their own.

        Personally, I’d be fully on board with Linux if all my software would run on it.  Alas, not all programs will, even with WINE or its cousins, and there are not suitable alternatives (yet).

         

        1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2727939

      For those thinking there could be a “Windows 11 Lite” which would solve the hardware issues regarding older PCs and chipsets, this is completely incorrect technically. The hardware requirements for the most part (except copilot requirements) mostly derive from the need to protect system hardware and firmware from newer attack vectors. TPM 2.0 differs from older security protocols. Secure Boot operates differently on recent hardware than previous hardware. BIOS security has been improved. And so forth. These features don’t fit into a “lite” version of any OS. Linux would be the best bet for these older PCs.

      As for Lance’s issues being with third party software, this is also not true. He can defend himself on this point, but I saw in his article that Microsoft software like Office, basic OS features like the Start Menu (unmodified), and driver issues which are software-independent, were among his complaints. Printers have caused others, including Susan, many headaches with Windows 11.  My complaints about Windows 11 track similarly, and include the deprecation of useful features like WordPad, and moving other features into the Microsoft App Store as add-ins.

       

      -- rc primak

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2728032

        I completely understand your position (‘rc primak’). That said, MS Office is not, personally, my preference, so I have no issues with it. I utilize a completely free software called LibreOffice. While many others will have the same issues, they, again, are attempting to utilize apps that are not fully functioning in the Windows 11 environment. Then blaming MS for making an OS like that. My brother-in-law worked 27 years for a tech company and still does the exact same thing. HE spends hours and hours fixing an issue and complaining about it. When asked, it’s a Window 95 program, that will not work under Windows 10. Or, upgrade the computer with a new HD, RAM, maybe a mother board, all costing around $600.00. Good deal, you saved $200.00, which is the price of a brand-new computer that has a better processor, and better graphics than what you just paid. MY opinion only, get a new computer and new app, then MS Windows 11 will be no problem.

        1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2727942

      I have two computers that can’t be updated to Win 11.  I’ll be converting both to Linux since it can do everything I use those two computers for.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2727953

      Thanks for the good article, Lance! Although I’m “retired”, I still run a bunch of Windows machines of varying ages from Gen 6 Intel i7 up to Gen 13. (anything older is now running WindowsFX). Apparently, MS really didn’t want us to upgrade older machines… I installed 24H2 on my older Gen 6 i7 with no issues, using Rufus (level 26100), but even so, I’m unable to apply the subsequent patches to 26120. That’s sort of annoying since the Gen 6 i7 machine is the one I use to run my BlueIris (software) DVR and my cameras. I’d feel better if I could patch it!

      Enjoyed your take on Win 11 and I, too wonder what’s in store!

    • #2727958

      I take exception to your comment about creating a local account in Windows 11. I help a non-profit with their computers which are used during tax season to provide free tax preparation. Every year there are about a dozen or so new computers to setup. There is no need for a Microsoft account as the laptops only need internet access to connect to the tax software preparation software. In the past I have used the various “back door” methods to set up the laptops with local user accounts. This year it seemed like none of the prior methods were working. So I initially started with my personal Microsoft account during the setup process. I then created a local user by answering that I didn’t have the users Microsoft credentials. I next changed the new user status to Administrator and them deleted my personal user account. Going through the “front door” to set up the laptops worked flawlessly and was easier and more reliable than the methods used in the past.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727996

      Windows 10 ESR

      There is a “Windows 10 ESR” of a sort. It is Windows 10/11 LTSC which Microsoft doesn’t sell to mere mortals.

      • #2728091

        There will be extended security updates offered for Windows 10.  More details will be coming in 2025.  Already we know at least a single year ESU will be there for consumers and three years for businesses.

        Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

        2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728012

      I appreciate all the information in the prior posts.  I have the same problem as many of the commenters in that I bought a Windows 10 machine when I could no longer update Windows (I don’t remember the version – 7?).  Shortly after I got that machine and did moved my data and applications MS announced Windows 11 and provided the tool to check the ability to upgrade to 11.  I wasn’t going to do that immediately, but wanted to verify that my new machine was going to support Windows 11.  To say the least, I was very disappointed (mad!) that I would have to buy another new machine in a short time.

      I would really like MS to lay out a roadmap and avoid forcing new hardware requirements on us.  MS could have told the manufacturers that after X date they need to be on the new hardware standard.  When I buy a new machine I want MS and the manufacturer to certify that it will be able to be upgraded to Windows 12.  Tell us now what the specs will be for Windows 12.

      The expense of buying a new machine is bad enough, but the time and cost of moving software and data and disposing of the old machine securely is too much for retired people with only moderate technical knowledge.

       

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728021

      As a person who used DOS and MS Windows from the start, I stopped at Win 7 because Win 7 was in my opinion at the peak of performance when Win 8 and then Win 10 came out.  I still actually enjoy using Win XP and Win 7 but don’t go online with them, I use Linux Mint for that now.

      Aside from the horrors of MS Windows updates (which I don’t have to endure anymore) the three best OSes that MS made were XP, Win 7, and Win 8.1.  All of them got better with age (say 5 or 6 years).  Seems that just when the kinks get worked out of MS OSes, they come out with a new one and start the whole fiasco over again (with the exception of Win 7 in my case).

      Very good article Mr. Whitney.

      Being 20 something in the 70's was far more fun than being 70 something in the insane 20's
    • #2727971

      I seem to recall that Windows 11 hardware requirements were significantly influenced by the US Department of Defence and this of course gave a big financial impetus for the MS architecture as they sell a lot of machines to the US government.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2727982

      I have been using Windows for over 35 years now (I played with Windows 1 and 2, but only installed it as my main OS after the release of v3.1) and basically developed a love/hate relationship with MS.

      The history of Windows shows that every second or third major version has been a dog, it not a downright disaster. Who actually liked Millenium, Vista and now (apparently) Windows 11?. In contrast XP, 7 and 10 were well-received and well-liked by users from the outset, many were even reluctant to migrate to a new version.

      I tend to agree with Lance and many of the commenters: Most likely MS, Intel and computer manufacturers colluded together to push Windows 11 in their mutual interest to sell more new computers, even though the improved security and the few new/modified features proabably could have been phased into a major update of Windows 10.

      I personally will hang on to Windows 10 until there will be no way to continue to receive security updates. I highly doubt that even in October 2025 I will decide to install Windows 11.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
      • #2728055

        I have been using Windows for over 35 years now (I played with Windows 1 and 2, but only installed it as my main OS after the release of v3.1) and basically developed a love/hate relationship with MS.

        The history of Windows shows that every second or third major version has been a dog, it not a downright disaster. Who actually liked Millenium, Vista and now (apparently) Windows 11?. In contrast XP, 7 and 10 were well-received and well-liked by users from the outset, many were even reluctant to migrate to a new version.

        I tend to agree with Lance and many of the commenters: Most likely MS, Intel and computer manufacturers colluded together to push Windows 11 in their mutual interest to sell more new computers, even though the improved security and the few new/modified features proabably could have been phased into a major update of Windows 10.

        I personally will hang on to Windows 10 until there will be no way to continue to receive security updates. I highly doubt that even in October 2025 I will decide to install Windows 11.

        Differing from your post, sorry, but simply “improved security”, should be a non-starter. MS hail Window 11 as an increase in security, and your post states it really does not matter. This is completely bogus in nature. This is the precise reason hackers get into systems that are NOT updated. The let’s just coast along until something happens is ironic at best. MS is being proactive in attempting to make the ‘End Users’ get a bit more involved and up-to-date.

        • #2728269

          Where in my post did I even hint that “security really does not matter.”?  Quite to the contrary, I beleive that the new security protection is a highly redeeming features of Windows 11, but they probably could have been incorporated into a major update for Win 10.  Please read my post again:

          the improved security and the few new/modified features proabably could have been phased into a major update of Windows 10″.

           

      • #2728113

        Who actually liked Millenium, Vista and now (apparently) Windows 11?.

        Lots (including me).

        • #2728271

          Yes, there were probably many less demanding windows users who liked Millenium, Vista and Win 11, probably because of the UI “improvements”.

          Some of us like to “go under the hood” when we check-out a new operating system.

    • #2728043

      Windows 11, particularly its draconian hardware requirements, made me do something I have resisted for years: take a serious look at Linux.

      One of my clients now has half a dozen PCs (out of 18) running Mint Linux for a web-based predictive dialer. It works just fine on Linux, but the vendor refuses to support its system on anything but Windows. If they did, the entire call center would be using Linux, and my client would save a lot of money.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728046

      I am a senior citizen, living on a fixed income, with a PC that cannot upgrade to Windows 11 due to many incompatibilities. Buying a new PC is not something in the budget so my Windows 10 desktop will have to chug along until it becomes problematic with usage.

      I sure understand your point and I agree completely.  However, there are ways to keep a current OS besides “buying a new computer”.

      Odds are your current computer will run Linux.  Yeah, that song has been sung for years and a Linux installation is still not safe for a complete novice (though installing Windows isn’t either).  If you use web-based email and other things that run in a browser, this could work for you.  And you might find someone from church or other social group or senior center who would do the installation and setup as a service to you.

      There are also ways to get a new or “new” computer that comes with Windows 11 for less than you might think.

      Refurbished/off-lease enterprise-grade PCs (I have had great luck with Dell Optiplex machines) that come with Windows 11 are available for $300-$400.  Remember, you already have a mouse, keyboard, monitor – you don’t need to buy new ones.

      Lastly, there are “mini” PCs that are under $200.  Take a look at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0CCDL6VS3.

       

       

    • #2728047

      Have some pity for those of us who have to get new machines or have clients who do.  Dell, for example, is shipping machines with 24H2 installed.  So far, my clients have not encountered any noticeable problems, but there’s always tomorrow.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728049

      Lance says “The Taskbar is less flexible and customizable than its Windows 10 counterpart”.

      Certainly true, but StartAllBack helps a lot.  That was the tiebreaker for me between it and Start11.

       

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728050

      Lance says “The Taskbar is less flexible and customizable than its Windows 10 counterpart”.

      Certainly true, but StartAllBack helps a lot.  That was the tiebreaker for me between it and Start11.

       

      Start menu replacements are fine for one’s own computer, perhaps for the computer in the house.  However, using one robs one of the experience needed when working on clients’ computers.  Tweaking client computers with one’s personal favorite start menu replacement really is not an option.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728060

      I have been using Windows for over 35 years now (I played with Windows 1 and 2, but only installed it as my main OS after the release of v3.1) and basically developed a love/hate relationship with MS.

      The history of Windows shows that every second or third major version has been a dog, it not a downright disaster. Who actually liked Millenium, Vista and now (apparently) Windows 11?. In contrast XP, 7 and 10 were well-received and well-liked by users from the outset, many were even reluctant to migrate to a new version.

      I tend to agree with Lance and many of the commenters: Most likely MS, Intel and computer manufacturers colluded together to push Windows 11 in their mutual interest to sell more new computers, even though the improved security and the few new/modified features proabably could have been phased into a major update of Windows 10.

      I personally will hang on to Windows 10 until there will be no way to continue to receive security updates. I highly doubt that even in October 2025 I will decide to install Windows 11.

      Differing from your post, sorry, but simply “improved security”, should be a non-starter. MS hail Window 11 as an increase in security, and your post states it really does not matter. This is completely bogus in nature. This is the precise reason hackers get into systems that are NOT updated. The let’s just coast along until something happens is ironic at best. MS is being proactive in attempting to make the ‘End Users’ get a bit more involved and up-to-date.

      Improving security does not excuse changing default apps without notifying us. Instead of changing default apps to those of Microsoft’s preference(s), the routine should say that a change was made to our choice(s) of default apps, state the change detected and then ask us if the change is OK with us. That would be a much more user-centric and user-friendly way to handle this.

      5 users thanked author for this post.
      • #2728274

        Ray, I totally agree with you.  The new security protections are definitely important but they could skipped the UI “innovations”.

    • #2728061

      My desktop PC is 100% Windows 11-ready and from time to time I toy with the idea of upgrading to Windows 11 if only so I won’t have to do it under pressure when Windows 10 support is gone.   Then I read articles like this and the idea gets shelved.    I really wish the people who say they “like” Windows 11 would give me a reason to upgrade other than generalizations like “it’s faster” (sic).

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728067

      Thank for the insights. My pc is a non-qualifier. While it’s tempting to go ahead and put W11 on it, your story has convinced me to wait…I think…. 🙂  With W11 I envison more crap stuck on it that I don’t want and introduces more bugs, vulnerabilities, and future incompatibilities.

      Pretty sure I’m going to stick with W10 for a while and go the route of 0Patch because those guys also fix things that MS doesn’t.

    • #2728075

      “Microsoft claimed that systems with older CPUs like mine would experience a deterioration in performance, but never provided any metrics to quantify the slowdown.”

      This will be an update from Microsoft, not the last one, it will start probably on the first of the year, and slowly update to go slower every update. They did the same on win XP.

    • #2728081

      I always thought that windows 11 came into being to satisfy the US military. I am using widows 10 and the latest updates are slowing breaking it I had the same issue with later windows 7 updates and you can’t skip an update even if you know the policy editor or how to use repair tools. I have an older laptop made for windows 7 running 10 ,it got messed up so I tried installing Linux mint on this computer ( which would have been a throw away) Linux installing has got easier most software now is in the installer list. This laptop which is old runs like a brand new machine and this version of linux will be supported for 7 more years. You save landfill and get an operating system for free.
      Bob Forrest

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728109

      Who actually liked Millenium, Vista and now (apparently) Windows 11?.

      Raising my hand for Vista.  🙂

       

    • #2728114

      There is a way to turn off the updates, even though Microsoft has deleted the setting in update,

      If you have the Group Policy Editor on your version of Windows, then use this method.

      Open the Group Policy Editor.

      Go to Computer Configuration – Administrative Templates – Windows Components – Windows Update

      Double-click the ‘Configure Automatic Updates’ policy on the right side. I disabled it, I do not have any updates now, so my laptop will not slow down on me from Microsoft’s updates.

      • #2728126

        There is a way to turn off the updates, even though Microsoft has deleted the setting in update,

        Double-click the ‘Configure Automatic Updates’ policy on the right side. I disabled it, I do not have any updates now, so my laptop will not slow down on me from Microsoft’s updates.

        So your computer is susceptible to all of the security vulnerabilities patched each month?

        Which update setting did Microsoft delete?

        1 user thanked author for this post.
        • #2728129

          MS removed the auto update setting, so they can update your PC to slow down, they do it gradually through the updates. And if you think they are updating the security vulnerabilities on win 10 now, you are mistaken. The last real update for win 10 was the first Tuesday of this month, which is when MS deleted the setting for automatic updates. I am as venerable as any other PC running win on it, they can not stop every hack out there, they just make it more of a job to hack.

           

          • #2728139

            MS removed the auto update setting, so they can update your PC to slow down, they do it gradually through the updates.

            Exactly which “auto update setting” are you referring to in the quote above? Exactly which setting was removed?

            Since you say that it’s been removed, exactly where was it found on your machine before it was removed?

            1 user thanked author for this post.
            • #2728177

              It was in the Windows update settings, the auto update switch was removed already on all win 10 PCs. Again, It was in the Windows update settings, the auto update switch was removed already on all win 10 PCs.

              Again, It was in the Windows update settings, the auto update switch was removed already on all win 10 PCs.

            • #2728316

              I have a Windows 10 20H2 VM that hasn’t been turned on in ages and that Advanced options “choose how updates are installed” is not there way back in that build.  If we are talking about what I think you are talking about, it did not just get removed in December.

              “Microsoft has made several changes to Windows Update settings in Windows 10 since its initial release in 2015:

              1. In earlier versions of Windows 10, users had more granular control over how updates were downloaded and installed through the Settings app.
              2. With subsequent feature updates, Microsoft began to streamline the update process, emphasizing automatic downloads and installations to ensure systems remained secure and up-to-date.
              3. By 2019, with the release of Windows 10 version 1903, the options for controlling automatic downloads became more limited in the standard user interface”

               

               

              Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

              1 user thanked author for this post.
          • #2728141

            What?  I have Windows 10 machines here and they still have all of their settings?  Windows 10 gets updates through October and believe me they ARE patching security issues.

            You are going to have to give me a screen shot because Microsoft hasn’t changed the update settings gui in my machines.

            Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

            • #2728178

              Are you sure you have the setting that says “auto update” that setting was removed in the Dec, 2024 update.

               

            • #2728318

              If we’re talking about the same thing, it was not removed in the December updates.  They have been slowly dumbing down that interface for years.

              Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

              1 user thanked author for this post.
            • #2728181

              Look in your update settings, see if you have the switch that says “auto update” if you do, your PC must not be connected to the internet, or you had the updates turned off. Because MS had that setting removed.

               

            • #2728292

              Screenshot please as I still don’t know what you are referring to?

              Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

      • #2728128

        I personally do not find that updates are slowing down my Windows 11 computer.

        Often it’s the applications.  Teams — that sucker will such CPU.  Browsers will do so as well.  I’m not one for immediately installing updates, but certain I do not recommend disabling them completely.

        Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

        1 user thanked author for this post.
        • #2728136

          On win 10, the end of service is in Oct, 2025, MS starts the updates that slow your PC in them so-called updates, they do it for every new OS they started doing it with on the 95 OS. win 11 is not ending service anytime soon, so that OS will not be affected yet. In other words, I am talking about win 10.

           

          • #2728143

            Okay this is not conspiracy theory central here.  Microsoft does not do this.

            Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

            3 users thanked author for this post.
            • #2728179

              You are using win 11 if I am not mistaken, when was the last time you used win 10? And yes, Microsoft does do this, they have been doing this for years, it was their way to get you to buy a new PC. it is a fact. And this is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact.

               

            • #2728207

              This isn’t social media. Microsoft is not intentionally slowing down computers. Stay on topic or prove your thesis with facts and benchmarks.  I use Windows 10 at home, I use it on another workstation in the office and it’s not one bit slower.

              I live on both 10 and 11 on a DAILY basis.  Then again I buy quality machines to begin with with SSD drives and lots of memory.

              Again, enough with the conspiracy.  (typing this from the home PC running Windows 10)

              Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

              7 users thanked author for this post.
            • #2728354

              And what is your proof that MS is not slowing down PCs? I have been a BETA tester for MS for a long time, I have seen the slowdowns and have had to report on them. The only one with the conspiracy is you, because you do not know anything about the OS. I also stated it won’t be a sudden slowdown, it will be slowly updated to slow your PC down, you won’t know it till it is out of service updates, that is the last update and will be the last part of the slowdown. How long have you used an MS PC? If you used the win 95, didn’t it slow down on you? And the win 98, XP, ME, and so on. Facts show it has been going on for years, and you seem to have not noticed a thing, so keep your conspiracy theories to yourself, because I do not care to hear them. You know for a fact the setting was removed, yet you are still going on about it not being removed.

               

            • #2728359

              Since IBM 8088. That gui was removed in 1507 as I recall it was not removed in December of 2024.  If you buy decent hardware it doesn’t slow down. Provide evidence otherwise I will be moderating any ridiculous claims going forward.
              Now if you want to complain that Microsoft makes changes and documentation often lags or doesn’t get updated, that I will agree with.

               

              typed on an iPhone that has to be upgraded as the battery no longer keeps a charge.
              I replace things when I can no longer get parts not because the operating system was slowed down by Microsoft.

              Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

              4 users thanked author for this post.
            • #2728396

              …when was the last time you used win 10?

              My son is gaming on his as I type this; it ain’t slow.

              Microsoft does do this, they have been doing this for years

              Nope.  Not now, not ever.  I’ve run every Microsoft OS since 3.11, and none of them ever slowed down.  Of course, I have a regimen of routine maintenance of the system, getting rid of old tmp files and such, running sfc /scannow and the like.  Most of my regualar maintenance is carried out by Task Scheduler, plus a good dusting out about twice a year.  But slow down?  Nope.

              Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
              We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
              We were all once "Average Users".

              1 user thanked author for this post.
            • #2728424

              I do the same regularly; any slowdowns I may had over the years were always caused by software problems, sometimes frustrating but I always eventually solve them.

              Obviously when I get a new computer (5-6 years) the increase in speed is immediately noticeable because of the updated hardware and additional RAM.

          • #2728303

            Please publish emperical proof of your (conspiracy) theory.

            I am no  great fan of MS however I think what you are claiming is bullsh-t.

            1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2728464

        You are right you can turn off the updates with the policy editor. Which advanced users can use however if you want to block just 1 problem update your supposed to use a hide update tool  that doesn’t find it or the power shell which won’t work on a computer that’s not absolutely perfect with instructions so complicated even a former repair tech is left scratching his  or her head.  This is absurd.

        Bob Forrest

        • #2728483

          Because of the cumulative nature of the updates, you can’t skip the main Windows updates.  You can skip what I call the “one offs”.   The idea that one can skip the main windows updates isn’t realistic.  It puts more of a pressure to be like Apple – that is the vendors have to step up and fix the side effects.

          Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

          1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728145

      Mr. Whitney, I wish to take the ‘Devil’s Advocate’ side of this issue. Not that I think MS is great, but an opposing point of consideration. The issues your article mentioned were mostly caused by 3rd party apps and NOT the OS itself. When the “end user” has an issue with a computer, he blames the OS immediately and does not consider what they did that may have caused the issue in the first place. Conversely, the Apple OS has been considered far more stable and the Apple products far superior to the MS products. The issue is, the Apple OS requires only Apple approved apps and typically does not play well with others. Due to computers changing and the technologies going forward, MS may be attempting to bring everyone into the 21st century to help with in this respect. While MS could have done things a bit different and not ruffled so many feathers, it may be time to cut them a bit of slack and update the old to newer technologies. Just like Apple has done and forced on people since the invention of the iPod.

       

      Well if I wanted an Apple, I’d buy an Apple.  But I don’t like Apple, any more than I like MS.

      But since I’m too rooted in the MS ecosystem (thanks to my job) then that’s what I’m stuck with for now.

      Nope, they need to be bashed.  Bashed for the bad decisions they make.  They have too much power and too much control thanks to their monopoly.

    • #2728159

      You mentioned registry edits to get older versions of Windows to work with new hardware.

       

      Any idea where I can get registry edit so I can use Windows XP with NVMe drives, Threadripper CPU’s and Nvidia 4000 series GPU’s?

      I still believe XP was and is the best version made.

      • #2728183

        I think he was talking about getting win 11 to work on a non hardware system. You can do a Google search on how to do that. But to load drivers for a Me OS onto an XP OS, it would be a hit or MIS if it would work, you can still find drivers for XP doing a Google search for them.

         

      • #2728205

        Not before it got Sp2.  When it originally came out it was insecure as all get out.

        Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

        3 users thanked author for this post.
      • #2728285

        I firmly believe that in post 2000 the best Windows Versions have been Windows XP Service Pack 2, Windows 7 and Windows 10.  After Millenium I learned the hard way not to jump on the bandwagon for every new version of Windows.  Vista and Windows 8 to my mind were disasters.

    • #2728184

      You are using win 11 if I am not mistaken, when was the last time you used win 10? And yes, Microsoft does do this, they have been doing this for years, it was their way to get you to buy a new PC. it is a fact. And this is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact.

       

      Says every conspiracy theorist about every conspiracy ever invented

    • #2728162

      We have a literal pile of computers in our household, ranging from my wife’s work 2024 Dell Latitude something-or-other that came with W11 to a 2003-ish Thinkpad T41 (WinXP/various Linux distro dual-boot), two Macbook 2,1 laptops from 2007-ish (one with some version of MacOS, one with Win 8.1), a Vaio F-series laptop from 2010 (Win7), a Thinkpad T430s from 2012-ish (Win7 to Win8.1 to recently W10), and finally an HP desktop computer from 2013-ish (Win 7 to recently Win10). Except for the Vaio (and the wife’s work-provided Dell), all were acquired used. Both Macbooks and the T41 came from e-recycling at my job a decade ago. All have been upgraded with more RAM and SSDs. The desktop didn’t boot when I got it (for free) but now runs great with a replacement motherboard, upgraded CPU, maxed out RAM, and SSDs.

      All still serve a purpose, although the increasingly bloated Internet is making the T41 and Macbooks largely useless for browsing. Both machines that have been upgraded to Win10 run fine, although I would prefer to keep using Win7.

      Here’s the thing: I’m not Tony Stark and I don’t need my computer to have AI to help control my Iron Man suit. I type and do spreadsheets and presentations and e-mail. I watch Youtube videos. Everything I do works fine on a 10+ year old computer. At my previous job I regularly ran massive-scale evolutionary biology/genetics analyses on super computers; we uploaded the data, set up the analyses, and reviewed the results on plain-Jane laptop computers.

      Would my typical work go a bit faster on a brand-new computer running W11? Maybe. But I can only type so fast and can only read e-mails and PDF journal articles so fast. I’m not being held back by the computers I have. In fact, the only reason I might need a new computer is that some massive corporation says I do if I want to continue typing research articles, reading PDFs, making spreadsheets and presentations, and watching Youtube videos.

      I suspect a full shift to Linux is in my future.

      3 users thanked author for this post.
      • #2730165

        Exactly how I feel about this. Stopping security service in a market world wide dominated by Win10 computers is straight out irresponsible. With this MS betrays their customers. I will therefore leave Windows and switch to Linux. I have had enough.

        1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728228

      You could also say that the hardware limitations of Windows 11 are anti-competitive …

      How so?

      My old Intel-based Mac mini fell out of support; the next version of macOS would not run on it and I could not get updated versions of Safari. Stated another way, to get to the next version of macOS, a new Mac would have been required. It sounds analogous to me, but it surely was not an anti-competitive move on Apple’s part. What competition was being suppressed?

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728261

      There is a “Windows 10 ESR” of a sort. It is Windows 10/11 LTSC which Microsoft doesn’t sell to mere mortals.

      That’s alright.  I know where to get it.

    • #2728270

      You could also say that the hardware limitations of Windows 11 are anti-competitive …

      How so?

      My old Intel-based Mac mini fell out of support; the next version of macOS would not run on it and I could not get updated versions of Safari. Stated another way, to get to the next version of macOS, a new Mac would have been required. It sounds analogous to me, but it surely was not an anti-competitive move on Apple’s part. What competition was being suppressed?

      I say this is anti-c0mpetitive because Microsoft is both an OS and applications company. It has incentives to use one to push the other. I would say that if the OS and apps were in truly separate companies, the OS company would have more reason to continually offer OS’s that work on whatever hardware is out there. They would have more reason to make their code open source so that problems could be addressed sooner rather than later. Why do you think Linux works on as many systems as it does? Because it has the need to work on them if it wants to succeed.

      I can make the same argument for an apps-only company. They would have reason to make their apps work on whatever OS’s are out there.

      Both Microsoft and Apple are striving to reduce competition so they can lock people and businesses into their system. That is the very definition of anti-competitive.

    • #2728336

      This is a very long thread! It took me a lot of scrolling to get to the end. I checked my folder dates and it looks like my last full win11 24H2 build was Sept 2,’24 and it has been nice to me ever since and I have deleted Mint (until 12!!!). I am a toy geek – that is, I like to stay relatively near current tech and I definitely like toys – Wanted to upgrade my processor so found a used 13 for cheap. Toys! (Big difference between that and 12 but none between 13 and 14.) Of course then I wanted to upgrade my mobo(found a resurected-bent-pin mobo for cheap) and though you don’t get much performance gain with a different mobo with the same chipset, I did find I gained a bit, and I also wound up with much better sound capabilities for my Bose Music Monitors – didn’t expect that! Again, toys!!! But win11 24h2 has been totally tolerant of that and did not ask me to re-enter my retail key.

      So yes, I am happy with the current state of win11 24H2. Finally. Will I be smart enough to wait 3 years when 12 comes out? Doubtful. But. Toys!!!

      3 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728361

      I say this is anti-c0mpetitive because Microsoft is both an OS and applications company. It has incentives to use one to push the other. …

      Both Microsoft and Apple are striving to reduce competition so they can lock people and businesses into their system. That is the very definition of anti-competitive.

      If so, Apple is FAR ahead of Microsoft as it also has 100% total control over the hardware that runs all of its products.  Apple did license its OS quite some time ago but summarily killed the program because it resulted in competitive machines – and summarily killed the companies that had paid Apple for the licenses along with it.

      Aside from the Surface laptops, which are a very tiny part of the Windows ecosystem, Microsoft does not make computers, phones, tablets, earbuds, watches, TVs or any other hardware with any processing power.

    • #2728381

      In response to Black Friday deals, the approaching end of life of Windows 10, and the new Presidents threat to impose tariffs on imported goods, we purchased multiple HP Z2 Tower G9 Workstations (SKU: 4N3U9AV_MB) with Windows 11 Pro for our business.

      We have now completed setting up Windows 11 and installing the apps on one of the units and already have a significant dislike for the Windows 11 interface.

      As a result, we will be leaving the rest of the workstations in their boxes until later in 2025.

      Fortunately, the HP three-year warranties start when the workstations are started up for the first time – not from the date of purchase.

      • #2728477

        I’m probably not typical.  I have one PC for my own use (well, right now two as I move stuff from Windows 10 to Windows 11).

        Though I would have probably learned to live with it, I would have hated Windows 11, but after installing StartAllBack, I haven’t found it terribly onerous.

        I recognize the comment somewhere above that that’s not an option for many, but most of what I use and have so far transferred doesn’t seem much different from what I’m used to.

         

         

         

        1 user thanked author for this post.
        PL1
        • #2728520

          Though I would have probably learned to live with it, I would have hated Windows 11, but after installing StartAllBack, I haven’t found it terribly onerous.

          Totally agree with this sentiment. I was using Classic/Open Shell, but when I upgraded to Win11, there were some issues, so I purchased Start11 (5 PC’s for $15). The only reason I chose Start11 over StartAllBack was that the former has so many options, I figured it was a better deal. In fact, with Start11, you can add ANY shortcut to any file and place that on your Start button’s Right Column, which is great. But, for one PC, it is $10 vs StartAllBack for $5, so I can see that is the better deal. I keep changing it up, but here is my current Start Menu.

          Start

          ETA: To Clarify Right Menu, vs. the left menu which is no different than the default Win behavior.

          1 user thanked author for this post.
          a
          • #2728536

            What I like about StartAllBack is it also fixes File Explorer. It is fine that Microsoft thought it needed to go icons for the cut, copy paste, etc., but why not give us a simple one-click option to undo that?

            I describe this as the programmers programming for themselves as they forget it is not them who they are making these changes for. I think they make changes for changes sake and not because those changes are actually needed or a true improvement.

            1 user thanked author for this post.
            • #2728540

              What I like about StartAllBack is it also fixes File Explorer. It is fine that Microsoft thought it needed to go icons for the cut, copy paste, etc., but why not give us a simple one-click option to undo that?

              I wasn’t aware that fix was in there. You are talking about the right click context menu? If so, I used the manual regedit way to fix that.
              ——
              BRING BACK OLD RIGHT CLICK CONTEXT MENUS IN WIN

              1.Click Search, type regedit, and click Registry Editor.
              2.Navigate to HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\CLASSES\CLSID.
              3.Right click CLSID > New > Key.
              4.Name the key {86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2} and press Enter.
              5.Right click {86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2} > New > Key
              6.Name the key InprocServer32, and press Enter.
              7.Select InprocServer32 and click (Default).
              8.Set Value name to default and click the value field, but don’t type anything, then click OK.
              9.Restart your computer

            • #2728634

              PC Mag or ZD Net published this a while back.  It’s what you said but in a conveniently formatted .reg file.

              —————————————————————–

              Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

              [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID\{86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2}]
              @=””

              [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID\{86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2}\InprocServer32]
              @=””

              ———————————————————————————–

              2 users thanked author for this post.
          • #2728565

            I was also using Open Shell.  It’s still my favorite Start Menu, but I really wanted the resurrection of some Task Bar features which Open Shell doesn’t have and, unless I missed them, neither does Start11.

             

            I actually bought both Start11 and StartAllBack but like being able to move the Taskbar  to the top of the screen and add an Address Bar to it.

             

            1 user thanked author for this post.
            PL1
            • #2728575

              I actually bought both Start11 and StartAllBack but like being able to move the Taskbar to the top of the screen and add an Address Bar to it.

              Start11 just added Vertical taskbars in their latest free beta release. (One thing they really need to do is have a search function in their settings, there are SO many of them.)

              https://www.stardock.com/news/532687/start11-v25-beta-arrives-with-vertical-

              taskbars  Start11-

            • #2728594

              Hmm, I’m not as interested in vertical bars as I am horizontal across the top which I didn’t think they had, but that makes it look like maybe they do.  Maybe I’ll have to take another look someday, but I also like an address bar integrated with the taskbar. Perhaps they have that also.

              1 user thanked author for this post.
              PL1
    • #2728390

      Windows-11-Pro-Version

      Windows-11-Pro

      Menu-1

      I’m posting this from my NAS.  The pictures are what it looks like, and the OS it’s running.  It ain’t slow.

      Microsoft intentionally slowing down Windows 10 via Windows Update is not a thing.  My son runs 10 Pro on his PC, he’s a gamer, and he pays particular attention to latency and lag in his online game play, and he’s fully updated.  It has the same specs as my NAS, as well.

      Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
      We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
      We were all once "Average Users".

      5 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728439

      I do the same regularly; any slowdowns I may had over the years were always caused by software problems, sometimes frustrating but I always eventually solve them.

      Obviously when I get a new computer (5-6 years) the increase in speed is immediately noticeable because of the updated hardware and additional RAM.

      In a similar vein, we are installing new or updated software apps all the time. They may just have more code or have more complex code that came about because newer systems have faster microprocessors, more RAM and solid state drives. Given these things, it is logical that older systems and OS’s would probably slow down.

    • #2728474

      I personally have found that software other than MS Windows or its updates have been the primary slower downers of PCs.  Software programs such as Anti-virus / malware that put a heavy load on a PC right from start up and stay running all the time are by far more responsible for slowdowns.  To be fair, these programs have a lot more to deal with now than they did two decades ago.

      Being 20 something in the 70's was far more fun than being 70 something in the insane 20's
      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728519

      Earlier I mentioned that we are in the process of setting up multiple HP Z2 Tower G9 Workstations (SKU: 4N3U9AV_MB) with Windows 11 Pro for our business and mentioned that I, “already have a significant dislike for the Windows 11 interface.”

      After getting under the hood of one of the new workstations, I have been able to tweak the settings and Windows 11 is beginning to behave more like Windows 10.

      Simply stated, there is a steep learning curve associated with the installation and setting up of a Windows 11 Pro computer.

      The steepness of the curve is accentuated by the need to:

      • To find license numbers for apps that were transferred to the new machine from its predecessor using LapLink PCMover Professional and
      • Removing software from the old the PC in order to be in compliance with our VPN, virus software, etc. terms of use related to the number of active copies.

      Life was a lot simpler before we began the migration to Windows 11.

      But our problems are not with Microsoft.

      Yes, Windows 11 is a complex package.  And yes Windows 11 ships with a lot of apps that we will never use and will be removing using Revo Uninstaller Pro 5 (now selling at 50% off).

      But I have not heard many people complaining that Windows 11 is not a stable operating system provided that users are careful during the monthly update process.

      In fact, we are finding Windows 11 operates like summer lightning when teamed up with an Intel Core 7-1470016 Microprocessor, 32GB of RAM, NVIDIA T400 4GB graphics, and two 2TB SSDs.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2728533

      Recently my work computer was re-imaged from Windows 10 to Windows 11 (23H2) and overall everything feels like change for the sake of change. The redesigned and reduced functionality of the Start Menu and Taskbar are a constant annoyance, especially the height of the Taskbar that can’t be adjusted anymore. IMO everyone involved that approved that design decision should be demoted! It ranks up there with the Windows 8 Metro UI as one of the worst design decisions that no one asked for or wanted. Unfortunately I have to suffer with it as I’m not allowed to install/use any kind of Start Menu replacement software.

      The ONLY positive I can say about Windows 11 is that Task Manager finally supports dark mode to match the rest of the system theme. It’s a lot easier on the eyes not having the contrast of it in white when everything else is dark (since I always have Task Manager open on one of the two screens to monitor system resource use).

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2728558

      What I like about StartAllBack is it also fixes File Explorer. It is fine that Microsoft thought it needed to go icons for the cut, copy paste, etc., but why not give us a simple one-click option to undo that?

      I wasn’t aware that fix was in there. You are talking about the right click context menu? If so, I used the manual regedit way to fix that.
      ——
      BRING BACK OLD RIGHT CLICK CONTEXT MENUS IN WIN

      1.Click Search, type regedit, and click Registry Editor.
      2.Navigate to HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\CLASSES\CLSID.
      3.Right click CLSID > New > Key.
      4.Name the key {86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2} and press Enter.
      5.Right click {86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2} > New > Key
      6.Name the key InprocServer32, and press Enter.
      7.Select InprocServer32 and click (Default).
      8.Set Value name to default and click the value field, but don’t type anything, then click OK.
      9.Restart your computer

      I followed your instructions up to creating the last entry, however, at this step:

      8.Set Value name to default and click the value field, but don’t type anything, then click OK.

      I click on Modify…, but then cannot change Value Name from (Default) to default which is how I am reading what you wrote. Is that right or wrong?

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      PL1
      • #2728561

        8.Set Value name to default and click the value field, but don’t type anything, then click OK.

        I click on Modify…, but then cannot change Value Name from (Default) to default which is how I am reading what you wrote. Is that right or wrong?

        EDIT TO ADD: Warning. I should have warned to make a backup (either via regedit or via backup software) before modifying the registry. I would have added this to my first post, but I can no longer edit it.

        You just want to click to open it and change nothing. It should look like this.

        Regedit

    • #2728563

      8.Set Value name to default and click the value field, but don’t type anything, then click OK.

      I click on Modify…, but then cannot change Value Name from (Default) to default which is how I am reading what you wrote. Is that right or wrong?

      EDIT TO ADD: Warning. I should have warned to make a backup (either via regedit or via backup software) before modifying the registry. I would have added this to my first post, but I can no longer edit it.

      You just want to click to open it and change nothing. It should look like this.

      Regedit

      Here is what I currently have:

       

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      PL1
      • #2728579

        Here is what I currently have:

        Looks fine to me. Just reboot and the right click on File Explorer should look like this.

        File

    • #2728581

      Here is what I currently have:

      Looks fine to me. Just reboot and the right click on File Explorer should look like this.

      File

      There are differences. The registry edit only affects the context menu, replacing the icons with the words. StartAllBack also returns the tabs of Windows 10’s File Explorer.

      I was not sure the registry edit was working because I was expecting to the see the tabs, too, but didn’t. That was part of my confusion.

    • #2728582

      What I like about StartAllBack is it also fixes File Explorer. It is fine that Microsoft thought it needed to go icons for the cut, copy paste, etc., but why not give us a simple one-click option to undo that?

      I wasn’t aware that fix was in there. You are talking about the right click context menu? If so, I used the manual regedit way to fix that.
      ——
      BRING BACK OLD RIGHT CLICK CONTEXT MENUS IN WIN

      1.Click Search, type regedit, and click Registry Editor.
      2.Navigate to HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\CLASSES\CLSID.
      3.Right click CLSID > New > Key.
      4.Name the key {86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2} and press Enter.
      5.Right click {86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2} > New > Key
      6.Name the key InprocServer32, and press Enter.
      7.Select InprocServer32 and click (Default).
      8.Set Value name to default and click the value field, but don’t type anything, then click OK.
      9.Restart your computer

      You should edit if you can Step 8 replacing “default” with “(Default)” to avoid the confusion I had that the entry name needed changed when it didn’t. Not everyone regularly edits their registry.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      PL1
      • #2728583

        You should edit if you can Step 8 replacing “default” with “(Default)” to avoid the confusion I had that the entry name needed changed when it didn’t. Not everyone regularly edits their registry.

        To late to edit. I just copy/pasted the instructions. I agree that part is a little odd, and I thought so when I entered it, but I just assumed you had to open it in order to make sure it said default. At least you pointed it out for someone reading this thread, and I’ll correct my own notes going forward.

        ETA: Does this sound better?

        8. Click the value field, but don’t type anything. Just be sure it says default and then click OK.

        1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2729110

      This was a very informative column, especially with the notice I see, now that it’s time for me to update this month. (I always wait a couple of weeks to update, per Susan’s usual advice.) I am told in settings/update, that my version of Windows has “reached the end of service”. It was installed March’23, it’s 22H2, Windows Home. Please note, I am NOT a “techie”, but do just fine with the basics, since 2000!
      If 22H2 is ok until 2025, why do I see this notice?
      It seems that there are still bugs in 24H2. How will I get updates now?
      If I click on check for updates, in settings, there is no download now message, just what I quoted above.
      Any advice is greatly appreciated.

      • #2729115

        I run W10 Home, 22H2 and do not get that message.
        Where are you seeing the message?
        Can you post a screenshot? (Save as PNG, click Select File under the post window.)

        cheers, Paul

        1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2729121

        Windows 10 22H2 is good till Oct. 8, 2025.

        Windows 11 22H2 reached EOS on Oct 8, 2024.
        Windows 11 23H2 is good till  Nov 11, 2025

        You need to upgrade to ver. 23H2. You can use an Enablement Package to do this.
        Instructions are in AKB6000018

        2 users thanked author for this post.
        • #2729124

          Oh, I wondered about that!  I’ll try your link, I see it now.

          Thank you!

           

    • #2729118

      I tried to get a screenshot, but the settings pop up box won’t let me.  The message I got is from settings/windows update/next to the blue box that says “check for updates”.  I got a minor update, but also the “reached the end of service” message.  I click on the blue print “learn more” but it doesn’t go to anything that specifically helps with a download etc.

      • #2729122

        In the searchbox, type “winver” (without quotes) and hit Enter.Are you using Win10 or Win11?

        • #2729126

          It’s W11, 22H2

           

          • #2729127

            OK. Upgrade to 23H2 and you are good. See instructions in link above.

            1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2729131

      Thanks so much!  It’s installed; now I hold my breath that there are no nasty surprises after the restart! 🙂

      • #2729132

        Check winver and be sure you’re good.

        1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2729133

      OK, I will after the restart.

    • #2729138

      All good so far!  Thanks a million!  (I checked winver.)  Sending a virtual hug 🙂

       

    • #2729220

      Lance, I read your article “How to reset Windows 11 without losing your apps, files, and settings”.  When last did you restore by using option “Fix problems using Windows Update”?

    Viewing 55 reply threads
    Reply To: Reply #2729126 in The state of Windows 11

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Cancel