The end is near – a Win10 1803 beta build without the watermark

Topic

New Reply

I’ve generally avoided posting about the beta builds of the next version of Windows, which has no official name (that’s GOOD) except “version 1803.” I
[See the full post at: The end is near – a Win10 1803 beta build without the watermark]

2 users thanked author for this post.

Elly, EspressoWillie

Reply | Quote

Replies

It’s gonna be a long weekend!

I know what you mean! Good luck and keep the coffee pot hot and full!

 

1 user thanked author for this post.

EspressoWillie

Reply | Quote

At some point they’re going to have to change the names, and I agree with everyone who says they should just use the YYMM nomenclature again because it makes sense and it’s easy to understand. D’oh who am I kidding, this is MS here… they can’t do ANYTHING that makes sense!

Have fun Woody!

1 user thanked author for this post.

BobbyB

Reply | Quote

@woody Good luck with the new edition. Keep doing the good work of educating less technical end-users!

1 user thanked author for this post.

dononline

Reply | Quote

Well, lets hope 1803 is stable and Woody approves it quickly, I already decided to skip the 1709 one

Just someone who don't want Windows to mess with its computer.

Reply | Quote

If the 1803 upgrade doesn’t cause too many problems, and Woody gives the OK, I’m with you … I’ll cross my fingers and toes, pray to the Galactic Bit Bucket gods, and, “Just Do It!”

1 user thanked author for this post.

Zaphyrus

Reply | Quote

Yay another one in my team, I must clarify that  I plan to upgrade just because 1703’s  EoL is soon. (7 months) otherwise I think everyone here including woody and susan would be against feature upgrading.

Well, to be honest I am against feature upgrading too…. We don’t have a choice.

Just someone who don't want Windows to mess with its computer.

Reply | Quote

Woody, Just restart your 17128.1 Windows and the watermark will be back.

Reply | Quote

Well, still had the 17127 build here.. Installing 17128.1 now.

Reply | Quote