Somebody in Korea is spoofing our domain and sending e-mail (so it looks like it is coming from our domain – even though it is a nonsense e-mail like 234klkjsdk@our-domain). I have done the IP lookup for the actual sender (reading the e-mail header, obviously) and have tried several times to contact the abuse@ e-mail for the offending ISP in Korea. The contact info listed for that ISP is fake and my e-mails get bounced back to me. Um, as an ugly American, is there some way I can block entire IP ranges (e.g. countries) from e-mail? I know this is a bit of an over-reaction, but this has been going on for over a year. Perhaps if enough of us block entire countries from e-mail, we might get better monitoring of spam? The horribly ironic thing is that recently I read that the US is the biggest sender of spam. Going back to my rant – the countries with the most spoofing of our domain are in order: Korea, Turkey, Poland. Anything I can do? At this point our domain has been on and off several spam lists as a sender of spam – which we are not, but the stupid lists don’t consider spoofing of e-mail addresses………. AAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
Rant: blocking entire countries from e-mail
Home » Forums » Cyber Security Information and Advisories » Code Red – Security/Privacy advisories » Rant: blocking entire countries from e-mail
- This topic has 14 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 6 months ago.
Viewing 2 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
WSJezza
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 5:23 pm #1039444Hi Eric
We have had a similar question in here just recently but the guy who asked was being an awfully decent English chap and just blocking one particular IP address…not a whole darn country
..
I can say that about the Englishman ‘cos I am one too
Yep, I feel for you but these spammers/ hoaxers/spoofers are clever little chaps and have a habit of not having a fixed IP address but the methods discussed recently is updating your site using the .htaccess file to block IP addresses.
If you have the IP range you could put a block range in but it maybe a big job anyway have a look at Banning Ip address from website with the associated links in the thread, it’s a start but wow a whole country
-
WSSpanitz
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 5:38 pm #1039445Thanks – I am familiar with the .htaccess file, however that only prevents them from visiting the website – I believe they can still e-mail –TO– the website, can’t they? If not, then that is what I will do. My point is to get these IP ranges to tighten up how they run things — I know it is probably a few people causing problems for the many, but still – having a fake or inactive email for the IP range contact (“for abuse contact”) is either sloppy or devious…
-
WSJezza
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 6:12 pm #1039446Sorry Eric, I get your point, that will teach me to scan read too quickly.
Personallay I think you are on to a hiding for nothing if you are going to try and do this yourself… I think the company will have to spend a little money and get some software to do this for them. My company is inundated with spoof/phish/spam etc on a daily basis. We use Mimesweeper as our preferred choice. You probably know that suspect mails get quarantined and each user on the domain gets a summary email of the quarantined mails daily or they can check ad hoc and educate the system to accept specific domain names.
We use a big company name because they can go off and collect the bad list of dodgy IP addresses and we just update regularly. All known emails get automatically dumped and the system has a maintenance program to delete it…no response from domain tends to stop the messages after a while…..
-
-
WSJohnGray
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 6:14 pm #1039447 -
WSSpanitz
AskWoody LoungerNovember 19, 2006 at 9:14 pm #1039536John, I need to check into Hexamail Guard — sounds like you are doing what we are talking about — I hate to say it, but we get nothing useful from Korea, Russia, etc. Man, I never thought I would be the “protectionist” type, but this is just @#$!% me off. If Korea et al can’t get their e-mail under control — we’ll just block them.
-
WSHansV
AskWoody LoungerNovember 19, 2006 at 9:30 pm #1039539Eric,
Just to make sure: you can use a filter to ensure that your PC or server won’t let through e-mails from a certain IP range. But this won’t prevent someone in Korea from sending out e-mails to others spoofing your name/e-mail address as sender. As has already been pointed out, there is nothing you can do do against that directly.
-
WSSpanitz
AskWoody LoungerNovember 19, 2006 at 9:43 pm #1039540I know, I know — I guess I’m being a bit of a socialist (???) or such by thinking that if several organizations started blocking irresponsible IP ranges, at some point, those IP ranges would be irrelevant…
.
It really sucks that you can have somebody impersonating your organization — and likewise tarnishing your name — and there does not seem to be anything you can do about it. As I stated earlier, I have tried to contact the ISP of these IP ranges, but the contact info is bogus. That’s what got me all (over-reacting, I know) annoyed… -
WSHansV
AskWoody LoungerNovember 19, 2006 at 9:52 pm #1039541I sympathize! Last year, I sent out a mailing from my private e-mail address to universities all over the world, including some in Russia. A few days later, I got reports that I was spreading a virus. Turned out that someone in Russia was spoofing my e-mail address to send out e-mails with viruses
Fortunately, this stopped by itself after a few days (without action from me) -
DaveA
AskWoody_MVPNovember 20, 2006 at 1:34 am #1039549 -
WSSpanitz
AskWoody Lounger
-
-
-
-
-
WSLeif
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 7:10 pm #1039448When you say you want to “block entire IP ranges (e.g. countries) from e-mail” are you saying you want to block emails coming into your domain, or you want to stop them from sending emails in the first place? If the former, and you have your own mail server, that is where you would block it. If not, or the latter, I think you need to take it up with your ISP or a higher authority – I think it is beyond us mere mortals to (legally) prevent emails being sent from a remote IP address, however much in the wrong they may be.
I’ll move this thread to the Security Forum which I think may be slightly more appropriate – see post 603,091 for a similar issue.
-
WSSpanitz
AskWoody Lounger
-
-
WSjscher2000
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 8:34 pm #1039458I very much doubt you can identify the actual sender. At best you can trust the header information for the destination mail server and the immediately previous relay. Any skillful spammer will have forged everything else.
In the old days, spam generally was delivered through unsecured email servers (open relays) which could be blocked by most ISPs. Unfortunately, with the spread of spam-bots into home, office, and university networks, there are now orders of magnitude more “mail servers” on the ‘net. I still believe the long-run solution is a tax imposed on the telecom companies that operate the “backbone” of the network serving the United States. By imposing a simple charge per SMTP transaction traversing the net, we can gradually push the cost out to ISP subscribers (like mobile phone text message plans with the first so many free each month). I would like to reach the point that indiscriminate spamming is uneconomical, or at least no more economical than paper junk mail.
(Won’t innocent victims of botnets lose out in this scenario? ISPs will need to provide customers with solutions to that problem, like local phone companies handle complaints about calls to “900” numbers: an ISP-level block on outbound SMTP transmissions other than to the ISP’s own mail servers.)
-
WSStuartR
AskWoody LoungerNovember 18, 2006 at 8:58 pm #1039462> an ISP-level block on outbound SMTP transmissions other than to the ISP’s own mail servers
Interestingly, my ISP has just implemented this. I received an email from them saying that they believe it is the only way to avoid getting black-listed themselves and if it causes me problems then I should raise a ticket with them.
StuartR
-
Viewing 2 reply threads -

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Cox Communications and Charter Communications to merge
by
not so anon
5 hours, 57 minutes ago -
Help with WD usb driver on Windows 11
by
Tex265
5 hours, 4 minutes ago -
hibernate activation
by
e_belmont
8 hours, 50 minutes ago -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 with AI assistant
by
Alex5723
12 hours, 38 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26200.5603 released to DEV
by
joep517
15 hours, 42 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26120.4151 (24H2) released to BETA
by
joep517
15 hours, 44 minutes ago -
Fixing Windows 24H2 failed KB5058411 install
by
Alex5723
18 hours, 54 minutes ago -
Out of band for Windows 10
by
Susan Bradley
20 hours, 27 minutes ago -
Giving UniGetUi a test run.
by
RetiredGeek
1 day, 3 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 26100.4188 (24H2) released to Release Preview
by
joep517
1 day, 11 hours ago -
Microsoft is now putting quantum encryption in Windows builds
by
Alex5723
1 day, 9 hours ago -
Auto Time Zone Adjustment
by
wadeer
1 day, 15 hours ago -
To download Win 11 Pro 23H2 ISO.
by
Eddieloh
1 day, 13 hours ago -
Manage your browsing experience with Edge
by
Mary Branscombe
17 hours, 46 minutes ago -
Fewer vulnerabilities, larger updates
by
Susan Bradley
6 hours, 12 minutes ago -
Hobbies — There’s free software for that!
by
Deanna McElveen
12 hours, 36 minutes ago -
Apps included with macOS
by
Will Fastie
10 hours, 28 minutes ago -
Xfinity home internet
by
MrJimPhelps
7 hours, 15 minutes ago -
Convert PowerPoint presentation to Impress
by
RetiredGeek
1 day, 8 hours ago -
Debian 12.11 released
by
Alex5723
2 days, 12 hours ago -
Microsoft: Troubleshoot problems updating Windows
by
Alex5723
2 days, 16 hours ago -
Woman Files for Divorce After ChatGPT “Reads” Husband’s Coffee Cup
by
Alex5723
1 day, 19 hours ago -
Moving fwd, Win 11 Pro,, which is best? Lenovo refurb
by
Deo
1 hour, 54 minutes ago -
DBOS Advanced Network Analysis
by
Kathy Stevens
3 days, 9 hours ago -
Microsoft Edge Launching Automatically?
by
healeyinpa
2 days, 23 hours ago -
Google Chrome to block admin-level browser launches for better security
by
Alex5723
21 hours, 23 minutes ago -
iPhone SE2 Stolen Device Protection
by
Rick Corbett
3 days, 4 hours ago -
Some advice for managing my wireless internet gateway
by
LHiggins
2 days, 11 hours ago -
NO POWER IN KEYBOARD OR MOUSE
by
HE48AEEXX77WEN4Edbtm
1 day, 13 hours ago -
A CVE-MITRE-CISA-CNA Extravaganza
by
Nibbled To Death By Ducks
3 days, 21 hours ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.