Unannounced, Microsoft has added telemetry functionality to the July 2019 Security-only Update for Windows 7 KB4507456. Alerted on Patch Tuesday by an
[See the full post at: Microsoft surreptitiously adds telemetry functionality to July 2019 Win7 Security-only patch]
|
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
-
Microsoft surreptitiously adds telemetry functionality to July 2019 Win7 Security-only patch
- This topic has 130 replies, 47 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 1 month ago.
AuthorViewing 43 reply threadsAuthor-
Remember, we are at DEFCON-2 = wait to install updates.
For those of you in Group B who install KB4507456, see @abbodi86 ‘s instructions:
AKB2000012 – Neutralize Telemetry & Sustain Win 7, 8.1 Monthly Rollup Model
We still don’t know if the telemetry functionality will be included in only this one patch, or if it will be included in future Security-only updates. That may be answered with the August updates.
-
Never underestimate the ability of Microsoft to s***w over its users, many of us were installing the security only precisely to avoid this spyware. Can anyone confirm that this update does indeed install the known telemetry services like diagtrack? It’s easily disabled I know, I’ve disabled several of the previously known scheduled tasks that abbodi86 has helpfully listed.
-
-
Yes, I read that but abbodi is saying it contains only the appraiser part and I am unclear if that includes things like diagtrack and autologger-diagtrack-listener. I assume so because files called diagtrack.dll and diagtrackrunner.exe are listed in the file information. So… make sure you update while disconnected from the internet!
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
The telemetry collection doesn’t bother me, it still should be a opt in or at least a option to send data in the event of a error or crash only. I don’t see much value in just sending these reports in so frequently. Seems to me a full report is only justified if you have a real issues you want to report. Microsoft has expanded its use of Windows update for some time now to include other things other then security updates. This isn’t anything new even to Windows 7 users. Its been a trend for Microsoft to broaden its use of Windows update.
With the forced updates for Windows 7 machines to Win vCurrent only a few months away, it should come as no surprise that MS is taking off the gloves and getting ready to ensure that when they push the new version to your computer, the upgrade will likely succeed.
Those planning on sticking with Win 7 for the long term should be very careful what they install as I suspect many update patches between now and then will have a secondary purpose associated with the looming end of Win7 support and MS is going to assume that you will wish to be upgraded when the time comes.
-
“With the forced updates for Windows 7 machines to Win vCurrent only a few months away, it should come as no surprise that MS is taking off the gloves and getting ready to ensure that when they push the new version to your computer, the upgrade will likely succeed.”
WHAT? I thought I’d been keeping up with all the monkeybusiness, but now you’re saying MS is gonna push Win 10 on us without our permission? This is hard for me to believe even for MS! Am I being naive? Uninformed? If the quote above is true then I will go to Group W.
Being 20 something in the 70's was far more fun than being 70 something in the insane 20's1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
Yeah right, maybe they’re trying to dissuade us from going to Linux?
Being 20 something in the 70's was far more fun than being 70 something in the insane 20's1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
I am a “light” user and have followed Woody’s advice since KB2952664 first appeared. I have done only security updates up till March of 2018. Then I quit ALL updates in expectation of MS slipping in code that would somehow make Win7 slow, frustrating, and a pain-in-the-butt to use. Looks like that’s what has happened. My system operates very fast, smoothly, and no glitching, hiccups or unexpected/unexplained behaviors. But, I am a very lightweight user. I expect to use this OS until I can no longer install/clone/image/copy it into new hardware, or access the internet with it. I suppose new hardware coded to NOT accept Win7 is not far away, if not normal. Thank you Woody & associates!
Susan, we need your Pinocchio with a loooooong nose.
..more like daffy duck! ‘Despicable’
If debian is good enough for NASA...4 users thanked author for this post.
? says:
was waiting for the other shoe to drop (or is it a jack-boot heel?) guess i have a few weeks to get over to Micro Center and get some ssd’s for my earlier than advertized Linux migration…
hey Ginz does heinoganda sanitize win7 KB’s?
mr. gates you should be ashamed
-
mr. gates you should be ashamed
To be fair, the MSFT Gates era was the best and considering where he is spending HIS money atm, I don’t agree with that statement, quite the opposite in fact.
If debian is good enough for NASA...
Before I start, I am a loooong time Langa List and Windows Secrets member…as in from the beginning…all the way back to the PCMag hardcopy days. I love you guys and will continue to be a Plus member. That said, this current post has finally tripped my trigger…
Enough of the gratuitous MS bashing. Pause and think just a minute. Across many of your newsletters, you criticize MS for “telemetry” AND for having numerous bugs in updates and patches. Yes, MS has reduced in house testing. Yes, MS has introduced telemetry without, in many cases, adequately informing the users. Regardless of that, any researcher/developer/scientist/engineer knows that testing REQUIRES that one know WHAT to test against.
Just look at your forums. The number of combinations and permutations of hardware and software – and their problems – is virtually innumerable. How on earth can you expect adequate testing without data and perspective on the hardware/software landscape? MS cannot reasonably duplicate that landscape and develop meaningful and reliable testing without KNOWING what that landscape is. Hence, non-invasive and transparent telemetry. Granted that “transparency” is, effectively if you will, a double entendre (a two-way street) in that the user should not be burdened with performance issues and that MS should adequately inform the users.
What I am driving at is simple: Temper the critique. It has become, or is becoming, hypocritical and is a detractor with respect to how a knowledgeable, respected, and appreciated member of the tech community expresses and projects the news.
As I said, I love you guys…but sometimes you need to look in the mirror…
-
Good post, galileo.
But… the question must be asked (again, because I and a few others have asked this question before, here and on several other forums and I’ve never seen a satisfactory answer):
Why is Microsoft so determined to collect telemetry from an operating system (Windows 7) that is reaching end of life in 6 months time?
What possible use do they have for the W7 telemetry especially seeing as there are no new feature updates coming for Windows 7 – and there hasn’t been any for several years now, plus the fact that they’ve also been trying to kill off W7 ever since W10 was released 4 years ago.
-
-
-
It’s the whole thing about Microsoft not asking if people are willing to participate, but instead attempting to force them, even to the extent of hiding the telemetry update in a security update, which it is not.
If Microsoft wants me to beta test their software, they can pay for it. I won’t do it for free so that MS can save money, and certainly I won’t do it for free on software that I have to pay for.
Dell XPS 13/9310, i5-1135G7/16GB, KDE Neon 6.2
XPG Xenia 15, i7-9750H/32GB & GTX1660ti, Kubuntu 24.04
Acer Swift Go 14, i5-1335U/16GB, Kubuntu 24.04 (and Win 11)
Of course, you’re entitled to your own feelings about MS behavior. However, I can state that this is the kind of thing that drove me away from windows 15 years ago; I refused to move to winxp. I am only here because I maintain a win7 system for a very elderly parent.
It boils down to the fact that I don’t trust MS, particularly with the lack of transparency about the telemetry. YMMV.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I fundamentally disagree with the need for telemetry. A good deal of the W7 kit is older computers that will struggle to run W10 well. So installing W10 on any of these boxes is a waste of time and money. Also, most people buy a computer from a retailer or directly from an OEM and do not modify it. So it is stock hardware. Thus, if you know the model you know the hardware specifications.
The more fundamental issue is the sneakiness with which it was done. MS does not own the equipment but is a guest on the equipment.
-
This is the fundamental issue, I think. Microsoft acts as though our equipment belongs to them, and is a de facto extension of their test lab. That is not the case. They don’t even ask, much less offer to compensate. They don’t disclose what is being sought. They just take MY data from MY machine. That is crossing an unacceptable line.
I don’t have a problem with seeking crash data in order to make the product better. I do have a problem with the way it is being done.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
I applaud MS for trying, but I don’t think they’ll ever get it 100% right, and it’s not their fault; There’s no such thing as a one-size-fits-all version of Windows.
That’s why options are good. One size does not fit all, but why restrict the product to one size when by its very nature (being a computer program and not a pair of jeans) it can be adapted to many different sizes with a few mouse clicks?
The trend for some time now has been to remove features and customizability and replace it with what is charitably termed “minimalism.” There’s not even a means to change the Windows background colors from blinding white to something else anymore, and that’s something my very first Windows version, 3.0, did have, and that Windows in general had until it began to be phased out in Windows Vista. Aero themes in Vista and 7 had the non-negotiable white background, while the classic and basic themes continued to be customizable. With Windows 8, the classic and basic themes were removed too.
This terrible trend can be seen across the software spectrum. In Windows, certainly, as the example demonstrates. In Mozilla Firefox, you need only consult any given release’s notes to find some example… in the current release, v.68, they’ve removed the ability to turn off e10s. Before that, they removed the “unread” tab state, which wrecked the last bit of suitability Firefox had for my workflow after the biggest feature amputation of all, the removal of the classic addons, otherwise known as the Quantum leap backward.
In the Linux world, GNOME has been lopping features off of its desktop environment at a pace to rival Mozilla. Their file explorer, Nautilus, has had so many features removed that many people end up using one from another desktop environment. The GNOME devs have removed so much stuff that the file load dialog in GTK+ and GNOME itself doesn’t even have a text entry box anymore, nor a button that will give you one. If you don’t want to navigate through the file system one nested folder at a time (good luck to you if you need to open a hidden .directory and you don’t have it set to display them in advance!), you have to know the secret CTRL-L key combination to make the text input box appear, with the devs refusing to provide a visible button to give users a hint that it exists, saying that the feature is more of an “Easter egg” than an actual feature, and that they don’t want to advertise its presence.
This bizarre, misguided fetish for removing features and making things simplistic (rather than as simple as is feasible) has got to end, and sooner rather than later. The idea that all software has to be aimed at complete beginners to the computing world, with no option to grow with the user as skill is gained, is just incomprehensibly ridiculous. If you go into a cockpit of a 787 or an A380, you will not find it all so simple and easy that you would be able to just start flying the plane without having to learn how first. The makers of those planes have simplified things as much as feasible, but aviation is not a simple thing, and it is impossible to make it so simple that a lay-person can just start using it. Instead, the cockpits are designed to make things as simple as possible for the intended users, which is trained, competent pilots.
It’s an extreme example, but a lot of stuff in computing is the same way. It cannot be made simple enough that any person who has no idea about any of this stuff can be put into the seat and start using the computer competently. You can dumb it down to the point that the new user is not intimidated by anything he sees, like options he does not understand (Hint: leave them alone if you do not know what they mean), but then it’s only maximally useful as long as the user is a complete beginner. As soon as some skill is gained, he’s outgrown the simplistic interface– and if it’s like modern software, there’s few, if any, options to change it.
Dell XPS 13/9310, i5-1135G7/16GB, KDE Neon 6.2
XPG Xenia 15, i7-9750H/32GB & GTX1660ti, Kubuntu 24.04
Acer Swift Go 14, i5-1335U/16GB, Kubuntu 24.04 (and Win 11)
Good post, galileo.
But… the question must be asked (again, because I and a few others have asked this question before, here and on several other forums and I’ve never seen a satisfactory answer):
Why is Microsoft so determined to collect telemetry from an operating system (Windows 7) that is reaching end of life in 6 months time?
What possible use do they have for the W7 telemetry especially seeing as there are no new feature updates coming for Windows 7 – and there hasn’t been any for several years now, plus the fact that they’ve also been trying to kill off W7 ever since W10 was released 4 years ago.
A rational question. Once again, pause and think for a minute.
Specifically, Windows 7 support is coming to an end – very soon from an IT support perspective. MANY users will be faced with moving from W7 to W10. What issues will they face? What hardware/software combinations will need to be accommodated to make the move to W10 as issue free as possible? What hardware/software permutations will present problems that will effectively prevent transitioning from a well functioning W7 environment to an equally well functioning W10 environment? How will MS KNOW the answers to these questions and HOW will they have adequate time to prepare the code that executes the transition?
Accumulating the data necessary to define the hardware/software landscape that applies to the W7>W10 transition REQUIRES…well, “gathering” said data…
Rationally, for MS to prepare for the avalanche of the W7>W10 transition, it not only makes sense, but is absolutely critical to start that process before W7 reaches EOL and (to mix metaphors) the tidal wave arrives. Hence, wouldn’t one would “expect” to see telemetry show up in order to start gathering the data?
Agreed, once again…the transparency issue pops its head above the waves (or given the metaphors…is it “snow”). Nonetheless, given the foregoing, it is not rational to view the telemetry in a nefarious context and it is entirely rational that MS “needs” to collect data to prepare and “test” its code against the hardware/software landscape.
MVP Edit: please allow good time between edits otherwise the post gets caught in the spam.
-
Nonetheless, given the foregoing, it is not rational to view the telemetry in a nefarious context
Yes it is.
What has a keylogger telemetry, as an example, to do with moving from W7 to W10 ?
What has this data transmitted to Microsoft to do with moving from W7 to W10 ? Nothing, except the desire of spying after users.Typed text on keyboard sent every 30 minutes
Transmits anything you say into a microphone
Transcripts of things you say while using Cortana
Index of all media files on your computer
When your webcam is first enabled, 35mb of data
Other Telemetry data… -
Indeed. Moreover, it’s perfectly possible for Microsoft to announce openly their action and the motivation behind it if they have nothing to hide.
As we move closer towards January 2020 I hope that most Windows 7 users will ensure that they still have GWX Control Panel installed and running, and not be swayed by those who argue that Microsoft will never go down that particular road again. Better safe than sorry.
-
People either refuse to acknowledge or conveniently forget Microsoft’s involvement in the PRISM surveillance program of which Microsoft was the first to join. PRISM has nothing to do with “crash data” and everything to do with your personal information being collected and given direct access to by the NSA. Snowden’s revelations completely demolished any possibility of Microsoft having good intentions with their telemetry and data collection. They are sneaking it into updates now.
It’s amazing to me how no one blinks an eye when they try to sneak this stuff into updates. This is exactly what I said would eventually happen and one reason I joined Group W over two years ago and without a single problem since I should add. It’s underhanded and sneaky which is not indicative of benign intentions.
Geez, I am WAY past giving MS the benefit of the doubt and they deserve every ounce of flack they get and will get. The cognitive dissonance from some people is crazy.
-
-
Most of them are open source and subject to code review by anyone, so, no, Linux distros generally do not collect any data otherwise you’ll hear about it fairly quickly.
I remember when Ubuntu started sending search results to Amazon, and people lost their minds. It was quickly reverted and changed to an opt-in feature.
I’ve seen articles in the past that claim that Apple collects telemetry data, but I haven’t touched a Mac in years so I defer to the online masses for that info.
I will not have it, as I do not allow updates. But, this is great info for those that do allow them. Thank you for always providing such useful information.
Their dishonesty and surreptitious behavior never ceases to be appalling. Only a hollow shell remains of the once-great company they used to be.
Not sure about Apple, but in Linux it depends on the Distro. Ubuntu has done Telemetry, but it is opt-out, and Ubuntu has been transparent on exactly what they collect. Other Distros (Fedora, Debian) to my knowledge, don’t use telemetry (they may have an “opt-in” function). Unlike windows, it’s difficult to sneak in Telemetry in open source, there are multiple eyes watching.
I suppose a rational question deserves a rational response. I have no issue with telemetry in W10, that was built in from the beginning, and users who install it should understand that. I have a HUGE problem with telemetry in Windows 8.1/7, because that was not built in to them from the beginning.
I should not have to give up privacy just because Microsoft may have an issue with upgrades. What I should have is the option to turn of all telemetry in W8.1/7, with the caveat that by doing so, Microsoft isn’t responsible for future issues with my device.
The issues you’ve mentioned with the W7 upgrade, by the way, were more of an issue with vendors not coming out quickly with W7 drivers, for the most part. If XP had telemetry, it would not have changed that at all. And much of W10’s issues are because of the rapid upgrade pace, since we don’t have a long term stable version for regular users…which makes no sense at all. There’s no evidence that telemetry has helped…even if the data is there, the only way to make stable software is extensive testing, which isn’t being done.
There is another danger to telemetry that isn’t being discussed here. What’s being sent to Microsoft is information that can just as easily be sent to a bad actor (Shadow Brokers, etc.), who can use that information to attack PC’s. If we’ve learned anything from Snowden, it’s that no business or government can keep data safe. There are no “Golden Keys” that cannot be cracked, especially with security being crippled by agents like the NSA, not only on the software side (Encryption, OS’s, etc.) but also on the hardware side (Hard drive Firmware, Bios’s, etc).
The fact of the matter is that you’re less safe with Telemetry active, and the trade off of an easier migration isn’t worth that.
Users will have to make decisions, since W7 is coming to an end, and W8.1 is not far off. If security updates have telemetry, it should just hasten the process. Either you accept W10 with it’s telemetry, go to Apple and have some or the same telemetry, or go to Linux and either opt-out or opt-in. Your choice!
-
I just was looking about for information on Apple’s use of telemetry and came across this 2017 thread in “bleepingcomputer” that might be interesting to read:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/650851/requesting-privacy-tips-against-apple-snooping/
There are a number of privacy settings in a Mac’s “System Preferences/Security and Privacy/Privacy” but can’t see there anything for directly blocking telemetry being collected by Apple itself, only for blocking some applications frequently accessed by many users from doing so. But, I must confess to not having really looked seriously into this aspect of macOS until now. Perhaps someone has and might care to comment further on this?
As a personal comment, I would like to add that, at least to me, it would be a lot less objectionable the collection of data by MS from Widows 7 and 8.1 if: (a) MS admitted openly trying to do this and explained why; (b) said “please?” Many developers of commercial and free software do ask that, implicitly, by giving the users the choice of either opting out, or opting in, depending on the developer. I can’t think of any good reason why MS should not do the same thing.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
Not a single problem. 130 Win7 systems wake up every morning and have fine days. Its been like this for 26 months now. I used to get at least a half dozen client calls a day. I am all set up with equipment to do that. Its been weeks since the last client call. I have immunized these systems against the MS virus. They all have System images that I have labeled “Final State”. I expect they will still be running just fine 5 years from now. Long live Windows 7, the last good Windows there will ever be.
-
I guess that it’s time for some monthly system image backups for all the PCs/Laptops before any July 2019/later “Security Only Updates” are installed just in case this nefarious activity continues on up until the last Windows 7 patches in Jan 2020.
I’d hate to have Windows 10 foisted on my PC or Laptop and the hardware found not compatible after the fact and any rollbacks non properly working. So it’s going to be wise to do more system image backups on Windows 7 systems going forward just in case of any GWX sorts of things happen once again.
-
-
Disgusting. Time to join Group W. You will be doing it 6 months early.
What’s the bet that we’ll be seeing another ‘must be patched immediately’ big security issue for Windows 7 probably within the next month or two and the patch will, of course, include the telemetry?
This stuff gets so predictable (and boring, actually) after a while.
Please note that if you agreed to join the “Customer Experience Improvement Program” with any Microsoft product in the past you agreed to Microsoft collecting and transmitting telemetry data.
--Joe
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
You are correct Joe. However, it was there at the beginning and could easily be refused. Not like the non-voluntary collection being planted by outrageous Windows Updates under the guise of security.
Even Google provides tools to delete all the collected data.
CT
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
Microsoft allows you to delete collected information too. See Microsoft account – privacy.
--Joe
-
Microsoft allows you to delete collected information too. See Microsoft account – privacy.
Hi Joe,
There is a difference in deleting information that has been collected and preventing it from being collected to begin with. To delete already collected data you must sign in to MS, that in itself is data collection, besides the fact you have to subscribe to use. :-/9 users thanked author for this post.
-
? says:
great, just what i want:
micro account information stored in the registry
please
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
The SHA-2 patch and the Servicing Stack Update are NOT included in the July Security-only Update for Win7 KB4507456.
SHA-2 update is KB4474419 and the Servicing Stack is KB4490628. They are separate patches. And both are issued through Windows Update. They will be a requirement for ANY August or later patch (of any kind). -
-
For Win7 only so far. I think Win8.1 will come later.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
There is a new Servicing Stack Update this month for Win 8.1, KB4504418. MS strongly recommends installing it before installing either the Rollup or Security Only patches.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
There is a new Servicing Stack Update this month for Win 8.1, KB4504418. MS strongly recommends installing it before installing either the Rollup or Security Only patches.
Perhaps you could enlighten us as to why the servicing stack update (SSU) only appears AFTER SMQR patches for July are installed via Windows Update then?
If debian is good enough for NASA...1 user thanked author for this post.
-
I don’t know the answer to your question! I’m simply reporting information I’ve found on the MS support pages. If you go to the support page for either the Rollup or Security Only patches you will find a statement that the latest SSU should be installed before either patch, and they identify the latest SSU as KB4504418. If you then go to the support page for the SSU, you will find a statement that the SSU needs to be installed exclusively.
-
ok, found it and yes, you are spot on with regards to what MSFT have published which is for catalog and WSUS updates. Thanks
Microsoft strongly recommends you always install the latest servicing stack update (SSU) for your operating system before installing the latest monthly security update. Installing servicing stack updates (SSU) ensure that you have a robust and reliable servicing stack so that your devices can receive and install Microsoft security fixes.
Extracted from microsoft link within the post.(my bolding)
If debian is good enough for NASA...1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
There is no SHA-2 patch for Win8.1 at this point. It will probably come later.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
So Microsoft adds KB2952664 functionality to the July security-only updates (and presumably later updates as well)? How I hate it!
I went with Group B precisely to avoid these kinds of things. I don’t trust Microsoft with their “telemetry collection” and I have said before if something like this is included with the security-only updates then it will be the time to stop patching.
So now it is the time to stop patching my Windows 7 systems. I will just patch up with the June 2019 updates and leave it at that. Like Canadian Tech said, it will be 6 months earlier than the original January 2020 timeframe. So what? I will not allow these kind of things to install on my systems running Windows 7, if possible.
I don’t have to worry about future updates possibly breaking my still working Windows 7 systems now.
Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst.
-
-
When MS started the “all in one, roll-up” updates (group A), I stopped getting them and started with the Security Only updates. I had always avoided the MS driver updates and other things I didn’t need. I didn’t and still don’t like having to download a 200 to 300 Megabyte update when only maybe 33 MB will apply to my system that month (which has been the usual size of the S.O. updates).
Also, I happen to have a slow DSL connection and don’t want to spend the time downloading the entire list of updates every month when only a few may apply to me. The telemetry thing is just another part that didn’t bother me much years ago, but now has me really concerned. I don’t like not knowing what MS is possibly fouling up my computer with.
Being 20 something in the 70's was far more fun than being 70 something in the insane 20's1 user thanked author for this post.
At least MS still has 2 of its strategic imperatives running at full-tilt – its Prism-like intrusiveness (this topic) and EEE (i.e. Microsoft admitted to private Linux developer security list).
There’s life (?) in the old dawg yet… 🙂
Even #1 MicroShill Ed Bott can’t get a straight answer (or any answer) from Microsoft as to the inclusion of KB2952664 functionality to the July security-only update:
And while he offers his own theory about this inclusion (“I suspect that some part of the Appraiser component on Windows 7 SP1 has a security issue of its own. If that’s the case, then the updates indisputably belong in a Security-only update”), he also notes “there are still issues like this one where the company’s stubborn silence is baffling. It just serves as evidence for critics that the company has an ulterior motive. Would it really be that difficult to publicly state that the additional files were included because of an unspecified security issue?”
Unless, of course, it’s not true Mr. Bott. But then, why should we trust anything Microsoft says at this point anyway?
-
Too late now.
It’s already on all the “Automatic Update” machines out there and many of the early SO patchers as well.
Their mission is accomplished.1 user thanked author for this post.
-
After reading about this on Ask Woody today and after having installed the Windows 7 group B patches for July from AKB2000003 I found (using CCleaner) the following two startup tasks added:
================================================================
Startup Tasks Removed (using CCleaner)
================================================================
Program: Microsoft Compatibility Appraiser
Publisher: Microsoft Corporation
File: %windir%\system32\compattel\DiagTrackRunner.exe /UploadEtlFilesOnly
Location: \Microsoft\Windows\Application Experience
—————————————————————-
Program: ProgramDataUpdater
Publisher: Microsoft Corporation
File: %windir%\system32\compattelrunner.exe -maintenance
Location: \Microsoft\Windows\Application Experience
================================================================I preferred removing them over just disabling them.
I don’t know if the security update added any windows telemetry services, though. There is one service that is a program compatibility service, but I think it is for setting applications (using their property sheets) to run as if they are on earlier windows versions. Does anybody know more about windows telemetry services that might have been added by the update?
Yesterday, I patched KB4507448 SQMR on a W8.1 x64 device, no issues.
Later I found that the Task Scheduler-Application Experience section
preferences had been changed, so I reverted back to my settings.
Today, I updated another Win8.1 x64 device with the same patch and
found the same had happened!
NOTE: both these devices have the same GP/Task Scheduler/Diagtrack settings.
This has not happened before as I check settings once patched every month.BEFORE PATCH:
AFTER PATCH:
Fortunately, I had previously removed the Diagtrack Service completely that
ties into the telemetry reporting of the Microsoft Compatibility Appraiser.
So, just a word of warning to others out there who use the same OS.
(unsure whether this affects SO patches or 32bit versions)If debian is good enough for NASA...-
I want to thank PKCano for making this post and for the askwoody loungers and MVPs for expressing their concerns on a situation that is blatant behind ones back involving turning on settings that some of us have specifically turned off.
Canadian Tech, James Bond 007, Sessh, Microfix and a few others are genuinely concerned about having telemetry added to an update patch. It was known to had been done in the normal patches Group A people received, but Group B security only were not having this. Microsoft know this. Even so Microsoft decides to add telemetry to the Security Only even though it is known those people DO NOT want to participate, and is even changing people’s settings and adding scheduled tasks for telemetry without any notification, permission or opt out.
There is a reason why I am here reading askwody.com and have been for years. We love Woody. Woody is the one that leads the way in revealing what is going on and sometimes that news is not what we wanted to hear as in this issue. The askwoody people are like woody in asking, WHY? Woody is our Curmudgeon and this is why we are here in the first place.
Thank you Woody for having the ASKWOODY.COM web site and for watching our backs.
Moderator edit for content. Please follow the –Lounge Rules–
Thanks to @woody for covering this in a Computerworld article. This will catch up Windows 7 users who aren’t on AskWoody. 1 question though… why Wouldn’t they be on AskWoody?! Even without being a Plus member, they get breaking news & inside info First. & the newsletter for Plus members is worth whatever they’re willing to pay per year.
Bought a refurbished Windows 10 64-bit, currently updated to 22H2. Have broke the AC adapter cord going to the 8.1 machine, but before that, coaxed it into charging. Need to buy new adapter if wish to continue using it.
Wild Bill Rides Again...1 user thanked author for this post.
-
Look at @abbodi86 ‘s AKB2000012 for starters.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
You cannot do that, it’s all or none
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
-
@abbodi86 has posted the instructions (with pictures) for controlling the telemetry in AKB2000012. Create a task to run at startup to continue to eliminate the offenders.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
I know there are members here who administer business networks, some with some finicky but necessary business software, and their burden is much different than mine. I just have a home network, and I tinker with Windows a lot.
Microsoft alone owns Windows, all versions/iterations. The rest of us have a license to use the software on our hardware. None of us own Windows in any version/iteration. Read the EULA. That is the licensing agreement to which you agreed when you first booted your PC/Laptop/Server/DIY hardware. In the EULA, Microsoft has reserved the right to make changes at any time for any reason.
There is an out, spelled out clearly by Microsoft, if you don’t like the changes. Uninstall their software. As for telemetry, I use O&O ShutUp10 to stop some, not all, of the telemetry. I want MS to know how Windows 10 Pro interacts with my system/software setup, so that the next update/upgrade will just work.
I don’t turn off automatic updates, I don’t read lists of “good/bad” updates. If an update pooches one of my machines, I have drive images less than a week old to get right back to where I was before the update. But I still don’t stop automatic updates; I’ve got an insurance policy in my drive images. My OS partition is 100GB, and I can completely restore it in ~6 minutes.
On Tuesdays I click “Check for updates”. I used a MCT thumb drive to upgrade everything but my NAS to 1903 a while back, and I waited for MS to push it to my NAS. This past Tuesday, they did, and I clicked “Download and install”. About half an hour later, it was running 1903 without a peep. It’s also running RAID 10 with four 3TB HDDs. It’s all good.
Microsoft is going to pursue their business model. The only available option for any of us is to uninstall MS software and migrate to something else. I’m OK with Windows 10 1903. I’m OK with automatic updates.
FWIW, no Windows update has ever pooched any of my machines. On the other hand, I’ve pooched them myself countless times. That’s why I rely on automatic drive imaging primarily, to protect me from myself.
But for someone to say that Microsoft “doesn’t have the right to …”; yes, they do. They’ve already told you about it, and you’ve already agreed to it.
Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.We were all once "Average Users".1 user thanked author for this post.
-
All I can say is you must lead a blessed life in not having any problems generated by a Microsoft update. Of all the times Woody has said not to be a seeker, or not to get an update because there have been problems reported, it seems amazing that you never had one update fail you. While it is also nice that you have backups like Geekdoms Group G{ot backup}, it does relieve the pressure of worry.
It is thanks to people like you that immediately go with the Microsoft updates that flow every month that the early warning canary starts to sing. Others like myself have definitely had issues with Microsoft updates failing to install, causing a black screen, causing an issue with other remote drives or some other glitch and the cure is to uninstall the patch and it is back to normal. Of all the people, including Woody, that has mentioned a patch harmed something on their computer and removal remedied it, how can this not be seen? Even if your computer is very accommodating to the updates, we all know everybody’s computer differs in some way. If everybody were not having issues, why are so many technically inclined people here at Woody’s state they are having an issue? I know woody is not writing false articles on issues a Microsoft patch has caused, because they have happened to me and others I serve. There are too many people criticizing Microsoft for harming their computer right after an update for me to say, “Microsoft is has the right to …”.
There was even a lady in California that won a lawsuit against Microsoft about 2 years ago for them “upgrading” her machine to Windows 10. She claimed to had lost time and money with her businesses and the courts found in her favor or it was settled out of court for $10,000. If Microsoft CAN DO IT, then why did they loose that case?
-
interesting..and your evidence to back up your post is where? links, quotes from articles? anything?
Check dark net site. But mostly it will not be posted. Any time I post links and info to there it gets blocked and not posted. Even just mentioned it get blocked here.
Moderator note: The last line of this post is blatantly untrue. If a post follows the RULES it gets posted. If a link is considered unsafe (we vet every link) it will not be allowed, or it will get deleted. This holds true for any post, by anyone.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
My endorsement above is to the Moderator’s Note.
I believe that, in addition to the fact that news coming from the Dark Internet hardly deserve to be considered as, at best, nothing more than well-intentioned gossip (that some times might be correct and some times, totally off the wall), a link to a place there can be also, potentially, a link to a Web site infested by malware and converted into a slaved source of malware itself — besides who knows what other really nasty things that might be lurking there.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
I’m not saying that people are not having issues with patches, they are. I’m saying that I don’t, because I don’t. By that same token, I’m not the canary in the mine, because I have nothing to report about bad patches.
I’ve been keeping current drive images since the late ’90’s, so now I’m pretty much fearless about updates, etc. We had a house fire in January, 2011 and I lost two mid-tower PC’s. But my drive images were safe, so I only lost the hardware. My oldest image is no more than a week old. My data is multiply duplicated as well as backed up in the cloud.
I also don’t run an OEM type Windows installation, mine is quite customized and tweaked. I’m currently running three SSD’s and three HDD’s with stuff spread out over twenty partitions/logical drives, not counting the EFI partition. My installation is fairly bulletproof to start with.
All of that notwithstanding, the title of this topic is “Microsoft surreptitiously adds telemetry functionality to July 2019 Win7 Security-only patch.” What I am saying is that Microsoft has said from the git-go that they are going to do things their way, and if we don’t like that, we can uninstall their software and quit using it. We have been warned.
Microsoft decided not to appeal the $10,000 judgement in California because it would have cost them more than that to take it to appeal. And what is $10,000 to a company whose profit is measured in billions? As I said before, they have a business model, and they are going to follow it.
Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.We were all once "Average Users".There is one major problem with telemetry that either most are ignoring or simply not thinking about. Think about what telemetry is. It is an open door to data on your computer, A door that by its existence means your so called “secure” computer is not really secure. After all if m$ can go through the door, that others can as well. That data is likely not just going to m$, but possibly malware writer as well.
If you want security at home, you do not leave an open door. No, you control the ins and outs. That alone means Windows 7 without telemetry is greatly more secure that build in hole for telemetry that 10 has. It is one thing to say ms, my computer crashed. Here the data about it. It is another for ms to enter your computer have a look around, maybe take the Vincent Van Gogh and leave behind the three year old scribbling. Again any opening no matter how small is still a hole in your security. Better no holes if you want to be secure.
Finally a famous Quote: Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have either one.
Benjamin FranklinDo we really want to give to ms the power to get anything, anywhere on our computers? Remember they write the code and can make more back doors and thus even more security holes. And malware comes in through those bugs and back doors.
Presuming this will also be in the future patches too, this means those of us following Group B will now move into Group W. What’s the point of manual Security Only patches if you get the **** you don’t want from the auto-updated ones too?
If so then for many of us, this now means patching for W7 has ended six months early. I won’t be installing any further patches from the June ones. I’d rather just be more vigilant with my machine and control what gets on it, and what it’s used for.
And with this sort of behaviour, they expect me to want to “upgrade” and continue using their products? No thanks.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
The only way the July Security-only Update KB4507456 can get installed on your computer is if you download it and manually install it yourself. It is not delivered through Windows Update.
If it is installed you can uninstall it by going to Windows Update and clicking on “View installed updates” in the lower left corner. Highlight the update and click “Uninstall.”
Thanks, PKCano!
I try very hard to keep up with all the MS Update shenanagans and this forum really helps.
But one thing keeps popping up in my head. If MS really wants to put telemetry or any other malicious junk into our computers, could it not do so as part of any released update? And could it not be so hidden in the code that it would be completely undetectable to anyone other than the MS coders?
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
If MS really wants to put telemetry or any other malicious junk into our computers, could it not do so as part of any released update?
Absolutely. Microsoft can put whatever it wants in the updates. But there are those who can/will detect it (even if MS doesn’t come clean) and report it.
-
I have 3 Win 7 systems. The unexpected (and unannounced) inclusion of telemetry was really the last straw for me. A huge disappointment.
All three of my Win 7 systems are dual boot, Win & Xubuntu (or Linux Mint). I set them up this way when the systems were new. I only use Windows for a handful of graphics applications I need to use occasionally. Ultimately, I use Linux on my systems 99% of the time.
I’ve had automatic Windows updates disabled for a few years now. But due to the recent telemetry surprise I decided to take more proactive steps… because I just can’t risk MS doing something crazy to my Win 7 systems during these final ~8 months before Win 7 goes EOL.
So, as others here have declared: I’m not going to install anymore updates. I’m just going to take many/all of the steps mentioned on this site to keep my Win 7 systems safe for another few years. The systems are pretty old and I will replace them in the next year or two. I may run Win 10 on some/all of them – but only if I see MS majorly improving how it’s handling Win 10 releases and updates. If not, it would be a pity because I’m been an MS customer since the Z80 days (yep, I’m old) – but I won’t look back if I completely walk away from MS products.
I use a Raspberry Pi based Pihole DNS filter in my home net (actually two, for redundancy) [don’t fret Woody, I whitelist your site]. So one of the steps I’ve taken is to add some pihole filter rules to effectively block MS telemetry and updates. With the rules in place, I reviewed the pihole logs to see the results. Most of what I saw was expected. A few things were not. I’ll discuss a couple:
I noted MS’s teredo ipv4-to-ipv6 tunnel was enabled on two of my systems. My home net is ipv4 only – and my router blocks ipv6 – so, teredo is of zero use to me. Besides, I believe teredo is pretty much abandoned by MS for Win 7 & 8 now. So I disabled it:
netsh interface teredo set state disabled
The other item was the MS Network Awareness (NCSI). You can read about it here:
https://blog.superuser.com/2011/05/16/windows-7-network-awareness/Anyway, NCSI may have been a great idea years ago, but today it just seems like another potential point of failure or abuse – so I disabled it via the registry setting mentioned in the above article.
For the other steps I took, I took advantage of my Linux/Win dual boot capability. I booted linux, mounted the Windows partition, cd’d to the windows system32 dir and:
mv CompatTel CompatTel_DISABLED
mv CompatTelRunner.exe CompatTelRunner_DISABLED.exe
Then I unmounted the partition. This method bypasses all the permissions incantations to do this from within Windows.
I do have the scheduled tasks disabled for the above… but I want to make sure the stuff never runs again – ever.
I can’t believe it’s come to the point where I actually have to treat MS update and telemetry services as potential malware. So disappointing.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
The functionality was added to the Rollup Preview in Sept. 2018, and to the Monthly Rollup in Oct. 2018. But July 2019 is the first time they added KB2952664 functionality (Compatibility Appraiser) to the Security-only Update.
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
Hi Slowpoke, I do not disagree with your conclusions. I am embarrassed to say the I am still “headed to Linux”, for more years than I care to admit. I still have not committed to one distribution or flavor, and so have data drives that I access from whatever I’m trying this time. This may be my new normal going forward.
I do however want to separate the discussion of “data harvesting for profit” away from “telemetry”. Telemetry should only mean “accurate measurements from a distance”. Meaning the vital statistics of the system to diagnose, repair, prevent and improve performance of the system alone. Telemetry does not need to include user’s data in order to report the data was handled properly. It might require some data to be included when reporting a failure to perform properly. But it should not cover using that data for profit, for the entertainment of contracted employees, or any other use beyond diagnostic.
Data harvesting is big business, an unethical business model in my opinion. It should not be allowed to hide under the ethical label of “telemetry”.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
We used to run W7 but abandoned MS after seeing all the problems with W10 from day 1. Switched to Linux Mint, which mostly runs and updates without issues. We are non-techs and are doing fine with Mint (with occasional help here). Highly recommended!
-
-
Not everything is for immediate financial gain, a large happy user-base outweighs any immediate financial gain IMO and further adds credibility to the developers and maintainers.
Look at 0Patch for instance, they will be recognised for years to come for their high standards and dedication for those who wish to stick with what they percieve as being a reliable and solid system.
Greed is a sin!If debian is good enough for NASA...3 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
Viewing 43 reply threads
Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Recent Topics
-
To Susan – Woody Leonhard, the “Lionhearted”
by 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
-
Extracting Data From All Sheets
by 3 hours, 37 minutes ago
-
Use wushowhide in Windows 11 24H2?
by 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
-
Hacktool:Win32/Winring0
by 3 hours, 32 minutes ago
-
Microsoft Defender as Primary Security Question
by 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
-
USB printers might print random text with the January 2025 preview update
by 6 hours, 15 minutes ago
-
Google’s 10-year-old Chromecast is busted, but a fix is coming
by 15 hours, 52 minutes ago
-
Expand the taskbar?
by 15 hours, 42 minutes ago
-
Gregory Forrest “Woody” Leonhard (1951-2025)
by 13 minutes ago
-
March 2025 updates are out
by 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
-
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26120.3380 released to DEV and BETA
by 1 day, 9 hours ago
-
Update Firefox to prevent add-ons issues from root certificate expiration
by 1 day, 16 hours ago
-
Latest Firefox requires Password on start up
by 1 day, 11 hours ago
-
Resolved : AutoCAD 2022 might not open after updating to 24H2
by 2 days, 5 hours ago
-
Missing api-ms-win-core-libraryloader-11-2-1.dll
by 1 day, 4 hours ago
-
How Much Daylight have YOU Saved?
by 1 day, 7 hours ago
-
A brief history of Windows Settings
by 1 day ago
-
Thunderbolt is not just for monitors
by 23 hours, 25 minutes ago
-
Password Generators — Your first line of defense
by 1 day, 4 hours ago
-
AskWoody at the computer museum
by 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
-
Planning for the unexpected
by 1 day, 5 hours ago
-
Which printer type is the better one to buy?
by 2 days, 7 hours ago
-
Upgrading the web server
by 2 days, 5 hours ago
-
New Windows 11 24H2 Setup – Initial Win Update prevention settings?
by 3 days ago
-
Creating a Google account
by 2 days, 23 hours ago
-
Undocumented “backdoor” found in Bluetooth chip used by a billion devices
by 3 days, 5 hours ago
-
Microsoft Considering AI Models to Replace OpenAI’s in Copilot
by 3 days, 16 hours ago
-
AI *emergent misalignment*
by 3 days, 18 hours ago
-
Windows 11 Disk Encryption/ Bitlocker/ Recovery Key
by 2 days, 2 hours ago
-
Trouble signing out and restarting
by 1 day, 1 hour ago
