Symantec advises that it and Microsoft have come to an agreement about Symantec and Norton antivirus problems with the August Win7 and Server 2008 R2
[See the full post at: Microsoft removes the update block for August Win7 patches on Symantec/Norton systems]
![]() |
There are isolated problems with current patches, but they are well-known and documented on this site. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
Microsoft removes the update block for August Win7 patches on Symantec/Norton systems
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » Microsoft removes the update block for August Win7 patches on Symantec/Norton systems
- This topic has 16 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 8 months ago by
anonymous.
AuthorTopicwoody
ManagerAugust 28, 2019 at 7:18 am #1923526Viewing 10 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
anonymous
GuestAugust 28, 2019 at 8:17 am #1923608Appears there really was no issue with the patches and Symantec according to their security advisory. Oops…better to be safe than sorry.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
woody
Manager
-
-
Demeter
AskWoody Lounger -
Alex5723
AskWoody PlusAugust 28, 2019 at 10:19 am #1923851You’d think that with six months’ advance warning, somebody at Symantec would’ve tested it.
Who says Microsoft sent a memo to Symantec or sent them patched to test ?
-
tbsky
AskWoody Lounger -
anonymous
GuestAugust 28, 2019 at 1:07 pm #1924056 -
lmacri
AskWoody PlusAugust 28, 2019 at 2:35 pm #1924193Hi Gene:
It also affected Win 7 SP1 users with Norton home consumer products, and a Norton v22.18.0.222 update that targeted Win 7 SP1 (but not Win 8.x or Win 10) started rolling out on 20-Aug-2019 that allowed Win 7 SP1 users to apply their available Windows Update patches. See the 20-Aug-2019 revision to the original product update announcement Norton Security 22.18.0.213 for Windows is now available! as well as Norton employee Sunil_GA’s 20-Aug-2019 post in the thread Is it safe to install August 2019 Windows 7 update?? in the Norton Community forum.
————
32-bit Vista Home Premium SP2 * FF ESR v52.9.0 * Norton Security v22.15.2.221 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
Demeter
AskWoody Lounger -
GoneToPlaid
AskWoody LoungerAugust 28, 2019 at 11:21 pm #1924664It sounds like Semantic demanded hook(s) to remain in place. And they would have old grounds to demand such a thing. You all remember Vista?
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 9 months ago by
GoneToPlaid.
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 9 months ago by
-
anonymous
GuestAugust 29, 2019 at 10:14 pm #1925684There has to be the necessary hooks provided by the OS maker in order for the AV/Firewall software to do its job and it’s the undocumented calls that some applications where trying to use that where causing loads of issues.
Whatever the MS OS/API hooks made available it’s only the documented hooks that are somewhat guaranteed to work regression free as best as possible, or in MS’s case the lowest cost possible for “properly” done regression testing that’s really been lacking since MS outsourced that QA/QC work. Symantec most certainly has not done their proper QA/QC and should have had plenty of advanced time to get that SHA-2 work in place before the deadline.
This whole Symantec issue appears related to the finances for properly keeping things working and Symantec’s Enterprise Security solutions being sold to Broadcom and Symantec only retaining the consumer Norton/other parts of the business. So Maybe that sale will allow Symantec to focus more remaining resources and fix their consumer oriented product offerings as there are still some issues remaining as far as Norton is concerned. I really wish that there were some Norton Firewall/Antivirus only option like there use to be with Norton in the past without all that cloud and utilities bundled in with the Firewall/AV functionality that I do not need or want.
I get my Norton via my ISP provider so that comes with my monthly service payments but I really wish that my ISP had Symantec just offer a Firewall/Antivirus only variant of Norton without the unwanted/unneeded extras. All the rest of that utilities and cloud integration cruft can be offered as an option but I’m tired of Norton taking control over my disk de-fragmenting scheduling over and over again after I have disabled any disk dfrag scheduling in the OS/Control Panel.
MS needs to be aware that it can not legally hobble the Third Party AV/Firewall makers in favor of its own MS branded solutions least there be a Netscape sort of antitrust issue once again. So MS has to provide at a minimum access to the same level of necessary OS/API hooks to the third party AV/Firewall providers.
-
-
anonymous
GuestAugust 29, 2019 at 9:54 am #1925015The Symantec support article notes, “Symantec will continue to maintain the safety of these updates via content, but in order to return the client’s ability to gather SHA-2 information on Microsoft signed files, we recommend that one of these upgrades be applied”. It may be that future SHA-2 signed updates are being added to the list of trusted files that bypass antivirus scans.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
RDRguy
AskWoody LoungerSeptember 4, 2019 at 12:46 pm #1936301For those who currently don’t have an active Symantec Support Subscription for Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) via MySymantec, Symantec just today posted the latest SEP “client-only” patches for SEP version 14.2.4814.1101 here.
Though SEP version 12.1.6 is no longer in support, the client-only patch package zip file (1.9GB / 2.1GB) contains all the appropriate SEP client-only patches required to bring any SEP client version 12 or SEP client version 14 up to the latest SEP client version 14 (14.2 RU1 MP1) build 4814 (14.2.4814.1101) as described here and here.
Unfortunately, Symantec’s “Download Endpoint Protection client-only patches and release notes” webpage here hasn’t yet been fully updated with the correct links to the corresponding release notes & fixes for this latest SEP build.
Win7 - PRO & Ultimate, x64 & x86
Win8.1 - PRO, x64 & x86
Groups A, B & ABS -
anonymous
GuestSeptember 16, 2019 at 7:31 am #1952439Hi. Does anybody know, how the block was “removed” technically? Did it came with SEP definition updates?
I’m wondering because my servers live in quite isolated environment, only WSUS has internet access to MS servers. So if my SEP version does not change, and WSUS rollup files do not change, then how the heck this blocking behaviour could be modified?
-
PKCano
ManagerSeptember 16, 2019 at 7:34 am #1952451I believe the removal of the block would NOT be through the definitions. It would be a program (engine) update to a later version or a patch that would change the version.
Please check with the Norton/Symantec website for further information. The update could probably be downloaded and copied to the servers.
-
-
lmacri
AskWoody PlusSeptember 16, 2019 at 8:10 am #1952495Hi. Does anybody know, how the block was “removed” technically? Did it came with SEP definition updates?
I’m wondering because my servers live in quite isolated environment, only WSUS has internet access to MS servers. So if my SEP version does not change, and WSUS rollup files do not change, then how the heck this blocking behaviour could be modified?
See my post # 1924193. Norton users with a Win 7 SP1 OS were updated to Norton v22.18.0.222 (rel. 20-Aug-2019) to fix this problem, while Win 8.x and Win 10 users remained on v22.18.0.213 (rel. 29-Jul-2019). Both those products have now been replaced by the latest v22.19.8.65 (rel. 13-Sep-2019).
The SEP product updates for Win7 SP1 and Win Server 2008 R2 SP1 were released 27-Aug-2019, and version numbers are listed under “Solutions” at the bottom of the support article at Windows 7/Windows 2008 R2 updates that are only SHA-2 signed are not available with Symantec Endpoint Protection installed. The FAQ refers to these updates as “SEP hotfixes“.
———-
32-bit Vista Home Premium SP2 * FF ESR v52.9.0 * Norton Security v22.15.2.22-
This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by
lmacri. Reason: Clarified applicable OSs for SEP updates
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by
-
anonymous
GuestSeptember 17, 2019 at 5:55 am #1954042I have tested a few workstations with older SEP version, and somehow they now can correctly see August and later updates from WSUS. Nothing has changed on workstation, except fresh definitions daily. That’s why I raised that question.
And the wording in Symantec article is confusing:
<..>soft block was removed<..>
Symantec will continue to maintain the safety of these updates via content, but in order to return the client’s ability to gather SHA-2 information on Microsoft signed files, we recommend that one of these upgrades be applied.
For some reason, they don’t say directly that “in order to get new updates, you must upgrade SEP”. They just recommend and talk about some “blocks”.
The following thread has some insights, but again, nothing clear, just suggestion that block initially came and later was lifted through WSUS metadata.
https://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/issue-about-sha2-windows-update-situation#
-
Viewing 10 reply threads - This topic has 16 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 8 months ago by
-

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 27868 released to Canary
by
joep517
2 hours, 2 minutes ago -
X Suspends Encrypted DMs
by
Alex5723
4 hours, 14 minutes ago -
WSJ : My Robot and Me AI generated movie
by
Alex5723
4 hours, 31 minutes ago -
Botnet hacks 9,000+ ASUS routers to add persistent SSH backdoor
by
Alex5723
5 hours, 9 minutes ago -
OpenAI model sabotages shutdown code
by
Cybertooth
5 hours, 46 minutes ago -
Backup and access old e-mails after company e-mail address is terminated
by
M W Leijendekker
1 hour, 4 minutes ago -
Enabling Secureboot
by
ITguy
55 minutes ago -
Windows hosting exposes additional bugs
by
Susan Bradley
13 hours, 40 minutes ago -
No more rounded corners??
by
CWBillow
9 hours, 28 minutes ago -
Android 15 and IPV6
by
Win7and10
1 hour, 21 minutes ago -
KB5058405 might fail to install with recovery error 0xc0000098 in ACPI.sys
by
Susan Bradley
1 day, 2 hours ago -
T-Mobile’s T-Life App has a “Screen Recording Tool” Turned on
by
Alex5723
1 day, 4 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 26100.4202 (24H2) released to Release Preview
by
joep517
23 hours, 17 minutes ago -
Windows Update orchestration platform to update all software
by
Alex5723
1 day, 12 hours ago -
May preview updates
by
Susan Bradley
23 hours, 25 minutes ago -
Microsoft releases KB5061977 Windows 11 24H2, Server 2025 emergency out of band
by
Alex5723
15 hours ago -
Just got this pop-up page while browsing
by
Alex5723
1 day, 4 hours ago -
KB5058379 / KB 5061768 Failures
by
crown
1 day, 1 hour ago -
Windows 10 23H2 Good to Update to ?
by
jkitc
3 hours, 29 minutes ago -
At last – installation of 24H2
by
Botswana12
2 days, 3 hours ago -
MS-DEFCON 4: As good as it gets
by
Susan Bradley
15 minutes ago -
RyTuneX optimize Windows 10/11 tool
by
Alex5723
2 days, 15 hours ago -
Can I just update from Win11 22H2 to 23H2?
by
Dave Easley
14 hours, 12 minutes ago -
Limited account permission error related to Windows Update
by
gtd12345
3 days, 5 hours ago -
Another test post
by
gtd12345
3 days, 5 hours ago -
Connect to someone else computer
by
wadeer
2 days, 23 hours ago -
Limit on User names?
by
CWBillow
3 days, 3 hours ago -
Choose the right apps for traveling
by
Peter Deegan
2 days, 16 hours ago -
BitLocker rears its head
by
Susan Bradley
2 days ago -
Who are you? (2025 edition)
by
Will Fastie
1 day, 23 hours ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.