• Microsoft is working on a full cloud-based Windows OS

    Home » Forums » Outside the box » Rumors and what-ifs » Microsoft is working on a full cloud-based Windows OS

    Author
    Topic
    #2569285

    It seems the leaked windows 12 iso are true. Windows 12 will be a cloud base OS.

     

    Say good bye to your privacy and data. MS will be able to steal everything without needing tel-spyware now.

    https://www.pcworld.com/article/1969519/microsoft-is-working-on-a-cloud-based-windows-os.html

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    Viewing 11 reply threads
    Author
    Replies
    • #2569295

      Say good bye to your privacy and data. MS will be able to steal everything without needing tel-spyware now.

      From the article: “The idea of losing your computer’s full capability the moment you move away from a robust broadband connection will be a hard sell.

      Whether Microsoft is still interested in this cloud-based push a year later, as it tries to shove “AI” into every press release, isn’t known.”

      I’d say it’s highly unlikely on a consumer level.

      Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
      We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
      We were all once "Average Users".

      4 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2569314

      I’d say it’s highly unlikely on a consumer level.

      I dearly hope that you’re right.

      However, given Microsoft’s record over the last decade of pushing unwanted features and policies onto individual customers, I am not very hopeful about the effectiveness of customer pushback against a prospective Cloud Windows. For better or worse, large customers in private enterprise, government, and academia will likely be a much bigger factor in determining what Microsoft can get away with.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • #2569331

      MS will be able to steal everything without needing tel-spyware now.

      What do you imagine Microsoft will do with your property when they deprive you of it?

      • #2569397

        What do you imagine Microsoft will do with your property when they deprive you of it?

        “Deprive” is not the operative verb here.  “Copy” is much more relevant.  “Online Windows” would likely make this simpler to accomplish.  The data would in all likelihood be shared/sold to third party data wholesalers to sell to advertisers for targeted ads; much the same as is being done now by Google, Facebook, et. al.  Or is that not obvious to you?

        Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
        We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
        We were all once "Average Users".

        • #2569399

          “Deprive” is not the operative verb here.

          It most certainly is if what anyone is being accused of is “stealing” (as in this case).

          (“Copy” would be relevant to an accusation of sharing.)

          “Online Windows” would likely make this simpler to accomplish.  The data would in all likelihood be shared/sold to third party data wholesalers to sell to advertisers for targeted ads; much the same as is being done now by Google, Facebook, et. al.  Or is that not obvious to you?

          So “data” here means identity/interests?

          No, it’s not obvious to me that Microsoft has done or will do what Facebook/Google do.

          • #2569415

            “Deprive” is not the operative verb here.

            It most certainly is if what anyone is being accused of is “stealing” (as in this case).

            Deprivation – the state of being kept from possessing, enjoying, or using something : the state of being deprived”.

            What do you imagine Microsoft will do with your property when they deprive you of it?

            Do you seriously consider that Microsoft is going to keep one from being able to use the very data that they wish one to keep using and enhancing with even more data through its usage?

            “Copy” is much more relevant.

            … if what anyone is being accused of is “stealing” (as in this case).

            That Microsoft is being accused of it is not a true indication that that is what they are actually doing.  Data theft is not “depriving”; it has an entirely different meaning.

            No, it’s not obvious to me that Microsoft has done or will do what Facebook/Google do.

            It is not obvious to me that they are not.  What are they doing with Bing?  I just launched Bing. 1 ad network blocked by Malwarebytes so far; uBlock Origin is at 87 and still counting; AdGuard is at 85 and counting. Scrolling through a bit, I can see a multitude of targeted ads based on my IP (which is not actually my location).  Those numbers are higher than I get when I launch Google; it’s only in the teens.

            Microsoft is selling that ad space.  It stands to reason that with better tracking of my wanderings and online shopping habits, better targeting (hence higher revenue) would certainly be feasible.  Would Microsoft do that?  Why not?  They are already in direct competition with Google, and if that competition is not aimed at Microsoft increasing revenue, what indeed is it aimed at?

            I’m finished.

            Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
            We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
            We were all once "Average Users".

    • #2569343

      With all due respect, Microsoft builds their operating systems for businesses. Businesses with secrets. The idea that telemetry is there to steal your information is overbroad, unproven and not for business.

      Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2569351

        The enterprise edition of Windows is different from consumer editions, though. A large percentage of the bad stuff that exists in the consumer editions (Home especially) is not there, or can easily be disabled by group policy (which every business of any size likely uses anyway) in the enterprise edition.

        Microsoft has already demonstrated that nothing is off-limits when it comes to monetizing consumers, and given the examples of Google and Facebook, it can’t be denied that there’s big money in surveillance capitalism. Microsoft can easily gather and sell this information for further monetization of consumers without affecting their corporate customers. Whether they will do this on a broad scale remains to be seen, but an even “cloudier” Windows would be a perfect cover for it. The Google/FB/Amazon experience has already shown that people will accept the spying if they’re told its purpose is to bring them wonderful new personalized services, and a “cloud” OS (which people are already told that Windows 10 and 11 are) is the perfect vehicle for that.

        It would not surprise anyone to have data thievery going on with consumer cloud services… it would only really surprise people if there was none.  Any inherent distrust of Microsoft right off the bat is well warranted, given their actions of the recent past, and it’s easy to see where they could abuse this.

         

        Dell XPS 13/9310, i5-1135G7/16GB, KDE Neon 6.2
        XPG Xenia 15, i7-9750H/32GB & GTX1660ti, Kubuntu 24.04
        Acer Swift Go 14, i5-1335U/16GB, Kubuntu 24.04 (and Win 11)

        1 user thanked author for this post.
        • #2569398

          Microsoft has already demonstrated that nothing is off-limits when it comes to monetizing consumers, and given the examples of Google and Facebook, it can’t be denied that there’s big money in surveillance capitalism.

          Consider OEM’s and Microsoft’s relationship/partnership with OEM’s that results in Windows being installed on virtually every PC that is sold.  Will OEM’s be content with a new Windows model that relegates them to selling commodity level, basically “dumb terminals” with minimal profit?

          Or would OEM’s be more inclined to offer for sale a plethora of configurations/options of full-blown PC’s with numerous avenues for increasing revenues (what we now call “bloat”)?  OEM’s don’t bundle 3-month free trials of various software suites for free; they get a fee from those companies.

          Microsoft’s Office suite and their cloud services are their cash cows, not Windows OS, but they do indeed make money from the OS primarily through their contracts with OEM’s to install Windows on virtually every retail PC being sold.

          Would the myriad home users who mainly surf the internet, check email, keep up with social media and shop online be just as content with a well-supported Linux PC pre-installed by OEM’s?  It would be even more attractive were these new offerings advertised as having as OS that does not harvest personal information.

          I see too many reasons for a cloud-based subscription Windows model on a dumb terminal to not gain much of a foothold in the home consumer or OEM space, and I just don’t foresee this happening any time soon.  I’m not concerned.

          Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
          We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
          We were all once "Average Users".

        • #2569487

          There are still a ton of business users including yours truly that only runs Pro.  The idea that Microsoft can or will steal anyone’s data intentionally again, does not reflect the reality that they are in the business of selling to other businesses.

          Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

          1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2569360

      With all due respect, Microsoft builds their operating systems for businesses. Businesses with secrets. The idea that telemetry is there to steal your information is overbroad, unproven and not for business.

      I agree there. If telemetry were collecting any personally identifiable information then it would fall foul of all sorts of privacy legislation (GDPR, CCPA and the like). Even in a business environment, just because you can disable everything, it doesn’t mean that everyone has. It would be too risky.

      That said, the idea of a cloud OS for consumers is a step too far for me if it meant losing the ability to use the device offline or paying a subscription to use it.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2569363

      What do you imagine Microsoft will do with your property when they deprive you of it?

      Share the data with affiliated 3rd parties which will sell it to data brokers

      2 users thanked author for this post.
      • #2569488

        Again this is not good business practice.

        Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

        • #2569504

          Again this is not good business practice.

          Agreed although unfortunately, bad practice is business also.
          C’est la vie

          Windows - commercial by definition and now function...
          1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2569475

      So in this cloud Windows scenario what happens when you lose your internet connection or you don’t have access to an internet connection? What happens when Microsoft  goes down? They use AWS, right? What happens when AWS (or any of the other critical services they use) goes down?

      Does the whole Windows world go down too until all the pieces come back up?

      Or am I not understanding something here?

      • #2569490

        Microsoft uses Azure not Amazon Web Services (AWS), and yes when they are down you don’t get to your computer.  You still have to have a THING – an operating system of some sort to get to said cloud.

        Also that (traditionally called thin client) still has to connect to local printers, devices, etc.

        There is vendor hype and then there is the reality.

        The concern for me personally and my business is less of spying and more of cost.  Anytime anything of mine goes subscription model, it’s better for the company that I’m buying from, not so good for me.

        On a regular basis the cloud – like any computer – has issues.  Some are noticeable, some are not.

        You get used to checking https://status.office365.com/

        or the twitter page

        isitupordown

        Microsoft is working on something doesn’t mean it will come to full fruition.  Just look at the File Explorer in Windows 11 for evidence of how they are “working” on things.

        Sounds like I should do something on “what does a cloud OS really work like”?

        Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

        2 users thanked author for this post.
      • #2569493

        Finally, Microsoft will introduce Windows 365 Offline, which, like the name suggests, will allow users to work within Windows 365, but offline. When a connection is restored, the offline and the online versions of Windows 365 will sync up. Microsoft hasn’t said how the “Cloud PC” will be stored on the client PC.

        Windows Cloud PCs will be able to work offline soon

      • #2569495

        What happens when Microsoft goes down? They use AWS, right?

        Azure, more likely. But, yeah, I agree that a computer that was not fully functional without an active connection to the Internet would be UNACCEPTABLE, unfit for use (my use, anyway).

        Hope this helps.

    • #2569521

      It would not surprise anyone to have data thievery going on with consumer cloud services… it would only really surprise people if there was none.

      At least as concerning as potential data thievery, are the actual cases of customers’ being summarily locked out of Microsoft accounts and denied access to their own data, actions taken with but vague explanation and little recourse.

      Anybody inclined toward skepticism on this point might do well to check out the following discussions on Günter Born’s website: here, here and here.

      Has Microsoft changed their TOS or their appeal procedures since then in any way relevant to this kind of case? If not, then there’s no reason this could not keep happening.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2569608

        Has Microsoft changed their TOS or their appeal procedures since then in any way relevant to this kind of case?

        No, nude photos (any age) have never been allowed:

        iv. Don’t publicly display or use the Services to share inappropriate content or material (involving, for example, nudity, bestiality, pornography, offensive language, graphic violence, or criminal activity).

        b. Enforcement. If you violate these Terms, we may stop providing Services to you or we may close your Microsoft account.

        Microsoft Services Agreement

    • #2569554

      What do you imagine Microsoft will do with your property when they deprive you of it?

      Being an ex MS worker, I know exactly what they do. I was given direction from my manager how to use it to make profit from MS.

      With all due respect, Microsoft builds their operating systems for businesses. Businesses with secrets. The idea that telemetry is there to steal your information is overbroad, unproven and not for business.

      MS loves businesses secrets. These add huge profits for them. I assist with making them money until I decide to quit after got more unethical use of users’ data.

      At least as concerning as potential data thievery, are the actual cases of customers’ being summarily locked out of Microsoft accounts and denied access to their own data, actions taken with but vague explanation and little recourse.

      MS just like gmail others, lock their customers accounts for specific reason or per government request. Only businesses users are very rarely lock out to get specific tasks carryout before letting them back in. This was one of my tasks as MS and finally made me turn in my papers and leave.

       

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #2569579

        There’s a lot of claims in this post. I’ve approved it just because I believe in respectful discussions but I also believe in standing up for what I say and not hiding behind anonymity.

        For the record, check the product use rights and the cloud agreements.  There are some products that are adding on a bit of advertisements (I’m looking at you Bing and Edge) but the statements in your post are not backed up by my personal interactions.  Email accounts are not locked without a reason and often merely because the person forgot their password and didn’t set up a reset method to get back in the account.

        Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

        • #2569698

          Susan, the cases Born details don’t involve forgetting a password and neglecting to set up a reset method. In this case, for example, a customer had switched to OneDrive from Amazon:

          It was looking to trim some of my online subscriptions (e.g. video services, unneeded software subscriptions). I thought my data was reasonably safe on OneDrive. I had 2-factor enabled. I decided to decrypt my important data (e.g. tax documents, salary information, school notes) and cancel my BoxCryptor subscription. That was done on Monday, 3/29. I did have some personal photos of my now girlfriend (she is 40+ years old) and moved them into the secure vault for a little extra security.

          Unless this customer has forgotten or left out some details, he did not display or share these photos. Nonetheless,

          I received a notice that my account has been suspended for a violation of the terms of use. I believe that all my content and actions within the Microsoft ecosystem are above board. I attempted to follow the process only to receive a message that I violated their terms of service and my account will not be restored.

          The customer lost not only the contents of his OneDrive, but also the Office 365 subscription that he had renewed the month before and his Xbox GamePass.

          As Born reports, the pattern runs like this:

          The user’s account was blocked out of the blue. The accusation is “violation of the terms of use”. If the trap strikes, the affected party goes round in circles with Microsoft. Because the nature of the violation is not named and no account is unlocked again.

          The fundamental problem is that Microsoft provides no specifics regarding what exactly the supposed violation is said to consist of, and no way to remedy whatever the problem is said to be:

          …nothing is confirmed, because Microsoft leaves the people in the dark – you are simply powerless. There is no information about what is being complained about. And there is no instance for clarification or dispute resolution.

          Whatever triggered the locking of the account must remain in the realm of speculation–which is actually worse, because the customer has no way to learn how to avoid the situation in the future. A reasonable approach

          would be for Microsoft to restore the account, communicate which files violated the terms of service, so the user can delete them. He could also imagine Microsoft deleting the incriminated files (if that even applies) and reactivating the account. From this point on, communication is then cut off, as the blog reader’s hope has probably vanished into thin air – Microsoft simply stops communicating.

          At that point, apparently the only recourse is to involve third parties:

          Among the ones that had their accounts restored, it usually involved outside help. Arbitration, lawyer, or reporting them to the Better Business Bureau…

          It really should not have to come to this.

           

          • #2569778

            Never blame human intentions on computers.

            In dealing with users they will often forget details and what got stored on their systems.  Or – their account was hacked and someone put photos or especially these days – hacked streaming videos on an account that is flagged by a computer system and locked out.

            I would bet that “out of the blue” isn’t as arbitrary as everyone is reading into this.  There are computer systems that scan for hash values of illegal files.

            When you have one individual with not a lot of clout against a BIG business, what can be seen as intentional actions is often businesses who have outsourced so much that they lose accountability.  If you would be able to talk to a knowledgeable human being that could actually read the log files of what the computer did, it would not be “out of the blue”.  There is a reason.  Just one that is not communicated well at all.

            Today a ATT official vendor was down the street in our office complex “upgrading the fiber connection”.  In the process they cut our phone lines.  They also did it three days ago.  Ask me HOW MANY HOURS I was on my cell phone trying to ensure that the issue was resolved.

            Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher

            • #2570401

              Ok, how many??

              🍻

              Just because you don't know where you are going doesn't mean any road will get you there.
    • #2569768

      Anybody inclined toward skepticism on this point might do well to check out the following discussions on Günter Born’s website: here, here and here.

      A fascinating read on Günter Born’s website. Thank you, @Cybertooth. I had no idea there were so many cases of MSA lockouts.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • #2569960

      Say good bye to your privacy and data

      Wow. You are suprise that you have no privacy. Privacy when out the windows over 30 years ago when cell phones became the main listening and tracking device. Profit of users info and people is the main driver now for several organizations.

      Being an ex MS worker, I know exactly what they do. I was given direction from my manager how to use it to make profit from MS.

      I worked for the telecom company as a listener of calls and took notes so I have similar experience. Now computes took over that work.

      The fundamental problem is that Microsoft provides no specifics regarding what exactly the supposed violation is said to consist of

      Yes. That is the case. A general copy and past is given and no explanation is given to the users.

    • #2570288

      I worked for the telecom company as a listener of calls and took notes so I have similar experience. Now computes took over that work.

      I had a similar job in Netherlands but it was for the government. I retired around the time computers were coming in. Glad that I get my pension from this job. Many young and middle age people have no idea how the world works. Privacy is not there. Now with computers and cell phone, it makes things easier for them. But most post everything on social anyway without thinking how it will impact their future self.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    Viewing 11 reply threads
    Reply To: Microsoft is working on a full cloud-based Windows OS

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information: