I’m trying a test to see if I can get a better feel for bots and spammers on the site and where they come from. When you come to the site you’ll noti
[See the full post at: Giving you the choice]
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » Giving you the choice
Tags: Patch Lady Posts
I’m trying a test to see if I can get a better feel for bots and spammers on the site and where they come from. When you come to the site you’ll noti
[See the full post at: Giving you the choice]
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
I had just did a screen shot to ask what was going on. LOL
Good luck blocking the robo spammers.
And a safe and secure new year to you!
I’m trying a test to see if I can get a better feel for bots and spammers on the site and where they come from
with Multi-hop VPN’s, hidden/compromised servers in proxy countries, dirty IP’s assigned by ISP’s, Tag teams on VPN’s and shysters chancing their luck on clean IP’s, I wish you the best of luck! We as moderators have had this to deal with from the early forum days and they always evolve their methods. AI won’t replace experience by moderators, it’s not just a quick learning curve either, there’s a large amount of skill, instinct and research that AI simply cannot replace. Wordfence and our antispam is getting better over time and making things safer for everyone here on askwoody.
Whitelist askwoody on uBlock. Reading about uBlock Extra on ghacks, all it does is add functionality to uBlock so the whitelist in uBlock should take care of the problem.
Ditto any other content blocking extensions. (e.g. I use uMatrix which always blocks Google analytics other than when I choose to allow it).
Susan wrote in her blog post that
Also know that if you log in to the site the tracking is disabled as well.
However, I am logged in here and I’m still getting the opt-in/opt-out notice at the bottom, so I’m not sure what difference it actually makes whether the user is logged in or not.
If you said yes to tracking it would ignore your selection. Yes I know that sounds a bit silly that they should not even offer you the box, but for now that’s how it works.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
I use Ublock Origin in Firefox, and although it says it has blocked six items on this page, the box ix still appearing.
I also use a Firefox extension called “Opt-out for Analytics”. As it says, “this is not an adblocker extension. It just asks the Google Analytics API that the user is not willing to be recorded.” Don’t know if it works or not, but can’t do any harm?
Windows 10 Pro 64 bit 20H2
I’m trying a test to see if I can get a better feel for bots and spammers on the site and where they come from. When you come to the site you’ll noti
[See the full post at: Giving you the choice]
What choice is there with Google? My choice is remove Google. Leave well enough alone. Again more confusion re what opt in and opt out really mean. Susan your explanation really didn’t help. Google is untrustworthy – period!
It transpires that any ad blocker etc etc will interfere with said Opt in/opt out selection. It would have been nice to alert members that all such blockers must be disabled to make a selection. Absolutely nothing worked until I disabled all blockes. I selected to opt out and restarted all my blockers. So it appears Google is/was the culprit – not surprising.
Opted “in” to see how that worked, but noticed right afterwards that there was no button available for opting out again. I must add that I am happy to help Susan run her experiment, but would like to choose when to stop.
So I logged out of AskWoody and closed the browser. Then connected again to Ask Woody with the same browser, logged in once more and went to Susan’s “giving you the choice” thread. And there was still no visible way for opting out. The cooky for “opting in” must be still in the browser cache and, if so, the only way to opt out after opting in may be to remove the “opt in” cooky. Is that right?
I am having the same experience with both Waterfox and with Chrome.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
I just reopened Chrome and deleted the cookie from AskWoody I found there, which must have been the opt in one. But after reopening Chrome and logging in back on this site I still am not being offered the option to opt in/opt out.
As my signature panel shows below, I am using a Mac, but I believe this has to do with the Browser, not with the OS.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
Wow, this looks soooo SNEAKY with it being at the bottom! Who goes to the very bottom of threads here? I don’t and bet others don’t…the regulars don’t because we know a blank text box is at the bottom and who wants or needs to look at that? Thus, I would never have seen this if I hadn’t read this thread so move it to the top!
I remain always logged in here (on the tab to here that I never close in Basilisk even when I close Basilisk)…after reading this thread it is not at all clear if I need to opt out or not???
There is no response from any “buttons” : opt-in/opt-out, info, hide.
Chrome Version 88.0.4324.87 (Official Build) beta (64-bit), uBlock Origin, uBlock Origin Extra
It”s a test that doesn’t work I guess because you are right. You can’t opt out (or in).
FWIW!! Ublock Origin prevents it from appearing. The site looks great in all other aspects.
Cheers
I use uBlock Origin the got the ‘banner’
EFF Privacy Badger says it’s blocking two trackers’ attempt to access cookies (default behaviour). Could set it to block them completely.
The two are from http://www.google.com and http://www.gstatic.com
… oh yes, this is while logged in.
After trying several different things in Chrome to get the disappeared “opt-out” button back after opting in, I finally got the opt-in/opt-out buttons back after I deleted all the cookies from AskWoody accumulated in Chrome. There was quite lot of them, mostly for WorldPress. I think it will be better for me not to press again “opt-in” in Chrome.
So far being cookie-less seems to be causing no problems I can notice.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
For me it appeared at the bottom of the screen, not the bottom of the page. I didn’t have to scroll to see it. IOW, it’s in the typical position for the annoying cookie disclaimers that I used to see so often — on most sites — until I added the “I don’t care about cookies” add-on to Firefox.
Well, it finally showed up at the bottom of the screen for me about 18:30 tonight. As per usual, something new takes longer for me to see than everyone else.
Just like on Facebook, when someone sends me a message or makes a post to m wall, I might not see it for 8 hours to 4 days. SSOOO frustrating.
Dave
I use uMatrix which always blocks Google analytics other than when I choose to allow it
I use uMatrix which always blocks Google analytics, and I never allow it.
the “I don’t care about cookies” add-on
Stated by the developer : “it will automatically accept the cookie policy”.
You want that?
Yes, I’m generally OK with that. I have CCleaner clear out all cookies before I shut down (aside from some exceptions I’ve pre-designated). If I’m concerned about a particular site I look at the Firefox site info and may manually delete cookies and/or change site-specific permissions, etc. I also have an Ad Blocker and a referer blocker. Plus, a Facebook-tracking blocker (Facebook Container). I disdain, and rarely use, Facebook, but of course its nosy tentacles track one’s activity across the web even without any purposeful FB interacion.
At least in my Mac, the blue bar now appears at the top of the screen in Waterfox and Chrome, but at the bottom of it in FireFox. I imagine people might notice that anyway, but just in case I mention it.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
Position of the blue bar:
It has not changed in any of three browsers (Waterfox, Firefox and Chrome) from where it was when I wrote this a while ago: #2336031 .
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
I see it ONLY at the bottom of site and clicking on Opt Out seems to do nothing.
But then uBlock Origin shows this:
-google-analytics-$domain=~wordpress.org google-analytics— script https://www.askwoody.com/wp-content/plugins/ga-google-analytics-pro/js/optout-common.js?ver=1.9
Using the latest Firefox v84.0.2 and uBlock Origin with AskWoody whitelisted.
The blue opt in/out bar is at the top of my screen/window and remains there no matter where I scroll to. That’s Ok with me, I hit the X (exit) to dismiss it.
I opted Out successfully yesterday and the blue bar read “Thanks. We set a cookie in your browser, so Google Analytics will not track your future visits.”
Today i logged back in to AskWoody, the blue bar was at the top of the screen again informing me the same thing…’Thanks, We set a cookie…GA will not track your future visits.’
Then clicked on the X (exit) on the bar to dismiss it and it disappeared.
I opted Out because I’m tired of Google everywhere, used to love it.
I’ve never seen Spambots on AW, thanks for keeping it clean admins and you unsung workers behind the scenes :thumbsup:
We avoid sites that use Google Analytics.
In addition, we delete cookies when we close our browsers.
As a result, we are restricting access to this site until Google Analytics is removed.
I’m sorry you feel that way. I’m trying to better understand the site, where spammers are coming from so I can protect it better so I can make a better site for you. I have explicitly set it up so that you are not tracked once you log in and you have opt in or opt out options. I have given you complete control over your experience.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
Can we have an update as to the current (and hopefully final) status of this Google Analytics cookie thing? I have been keeping up with the twists and turns in this thread, and honestly I am no clearer on it than when I started.
Specifically, if one is signed in here, does it make any difference one way or another whether one 1) clicks to opt in, 2) clicks to opt out, or 3) doesn’t click on either of those choices? And if any of these actions does make a difference, what is the difference?
Clarity and completeness, please. And the less technical the explanation, the better.
Thank you.
Cybertooth,
For me, if I click to opt in, that makes a big difference, because both the ‘Click here to opt in’ and ‘Click here to opt out’ buttons in the blue bar immediately disappear, replaced, irreversibly, by a note of thanks in the blue bar (this bar that might be at the very top or the very bottom of the screen, depending on the browser) and, after trying several things, the only way I’ve found to “opt out” is to get my hands inside the guts of the browser to find and delete the ‘askwoody.com’ cookie or cookies.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
If you’ve clicked to opt in, then the cookie is set. I have specifically set the settings to “Disable tracking of all logged-in users”. Clicking on the option will make the blue bar go away – again because the cookie is set.
All you have to do is ensure that you opt out and log in. These actions will not track you.
I’m trying to be really respectful of everyone privacy but at the same time allow me to get a bit more diagnostic information. Again thank you in advance for your understanding.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
Susan: “All you have to do is ensure that you opt out and log in”
Susan, for me, at last, the only way to opt out is to delete the cookie. If there is another way, I would love to hear about it. But the moment I click ‘opt in’ the possibility of opting out disappears and going into the browser, finding and deleting the cookie is all I can do to opt out. Is this what you mean by “all you have to do”?
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
You cannot know if you are opted in or out just by looking at the screen / blue bar.
You need to allow it to set the cookie so that “opt out” is the default when you visit. If you still get the blue bar it’s because you block something.
More importantly, once logged in the tracking is off.
cheers, Paul
Paul_T “More importantly, once logged in the tracking is off.”
So only those who visit without logging in (i.e., anonymously) get tracked?
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
satrow: “Anon. visitors can opt-out as well, we all get that option”
So let me see if I got this right: the anonymous are tracked as soon as they show up, but can opt out later, or else log out, and the rest of us only gets tracked between opting in and logging out. Next time we log in we are not tracked unless we opt in again. So the choice of opting in is for the current session only.
What this has to do with the “opt out” button disappearing as soon as I press “opt in” while logged in? Does this happens only to me?
And yes, I get the cookie installed in the browser. Deleting it opts me out.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
Opting in or out changes the complete content of the bar, see the difference between the images I posted earlier.
A Google cookie is only allowed to be set after you’ve made the choice – when you Opt-in, you get the gapro-optin cookie. Same for anons, logging out or clearing cookies, will reset the status.
I can’t opt out on Windows 8.0 Pro computer. There is NO response on trying to click to opt out on Basilisk 2021.01.05 which is my default browser. Same thing on Fx 52.9 ESR. On my Windows 10 computer, I can’t opt out or in there either but I see all the cookies set on both so I don’t believe that one is automatically NOT tracked if logged in on either of my computers. I don’t have to worry since I have ALWAYS done the CORRECT thing and blocked Google Analytics in Hostsman on both computers but I am still bothered that a tech site would be so enamored of evil Google.
Plus, the blue bar looks different on Windows 8.0 Pro from Windows 10 Pro(2004).
Maybe this works on Google garbage browsers but I have everything Google (about 40 addresses) blocked in Hostsman. I have NEVER allowed Google garbage in 22 years on computers.
Why do you use recaptcha (Google garbage) when there is now the excellent hCaptcha that is open source and does NOT track one?
I’m trying to be really respectful of everyone privacy
Respectfully, using Google Analytics is not the greatest way for anything privacy related IMO. My only question is when will this Google “stuff” be turned off?
So let me see if I got this right: the anonymous are tracked as soon as they show up, but can opt out later, or else log out,
how can anons log out when they are not logged in to start with?
Anonymous: “how can anons log out when they are not logged in to start with?”
Sorry, Anonymous! I meant “to close the browser window, breaking the connection to AskWoody and then move on.”
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
I think what’s throwing me is the fact that two choices are given simultaneously, to Opt In or to Opt Out. As they used to say, this does not compute (so to speak). If I have the choice to EITHER opt in or opt out, then what status am I currently in? I’m reminded of Schrödinger’s Cat.
Generally speaking, a user would be given the option to opt in if they are currently “out,” or a choice to opt out if they are currently “in”. But not both at the same time: it suggests that they are currently opted both in and out. This in-between, either-or state is as confusing as quantum physics.
Opting in or out changes the complete content of the bar, see the difference between the images I posted earlier.
A Google cookie is only allowed to be set after you’ve made the choice – when you Opt-in, you get the gapro-optin cookie. Same for anons, logging out or clearing cookies, will reset the status.
See also my earlier Post and images.
I had seen that, thanks. I still don’t understand how, at the outset, a user can be offered BOTH an opt-in and an opt-out option. Offering either one implies that the user is in the other state, so how can the user be offered both??
To illustrate what I mean, below is a screenshot of what I’m seeing:
And what is the default if you choose not to make a choice, either via ignoring the banner or by clicking the X to close (and don’t log in)? Does that leave you opted in or opted out?
Thanks, but my question was specifically about when I’m not logged in, because on most visits I don’t — particularly the brief ones. Perhaps I shouldn’t have made that part a parenthetical.
Regardless, I’m certainly sympathetic to your goal of trying to rid the site of sp**mers.
BTW, I wonder why above the text box there is a pink box that says, “Error: Are you sure you wanted to do that?”
Cybrtooth writes: ” If you want the opt out option to reappear delete the askwoody cookies and reload the site! ”
Cybertooth, that is what I have repeatedly explained here and that also have found that works, but is also something I rather don’t do, as I cannot be sure exactly which cookies are not worth keeping and which ones are.
Concretely: If I wanted to opt out, then I have tried and found that deleting all askwoody.com cookies does work, for example, but I’m not sure that they (and also those with ‘google’ in their names) are all equally disposable without unwanted consequences.
So my final conclusion is: that this really does not work for me, for whatever reason, perhaps to do with some browser options that, unknown to me, when I downloaded and installed the browsers, came preset to, for Susan’s project, unhelpful defaults.
I hope enough people can participate without the problems I have mentioned and she gets enough information out of their help to get that sense she is after of how bad things are re spying, tracking, etc., etc. Of all those cybernetic evils of our days that buzz around everything, AskWoody included.
That is a good thing to find out: so good luck, Susan, and sorry that, although I have tried, can’t be with you in this one.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
If I wanted to opt out, then I have tried and found that deleting all askwoody.com cookies does work
How do you know it works?
cheers, Paul
Because it does. Not a very scientific answer, but is the best one I have.
Or as Woody once explained the reason supporting his position on a tricky issue: “Personal observation.”
Kind regards, OscarCP
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
I’ve been exploring this more on both Basilisk and Fx. So, I got rid of all cookies here on both and then played with different settings regarding cookies.
One thing that really struck me is that because I don’t allow anything Google is that I will never be able to post here unless logged in. When I tried to make a post here without logging in first, I was blocked from posting and asked to complete the Google captcha first! How could I do that? I block all Google offerings on all my computers. I couldn’t see a captcha.
I really think that a tech site like this one should not be so enamored of Google.
The google recaptcha is not new and has been there for years. It’s designed to ensure that anonymous posters can’t spam the site.
This is a wordpress site. It’s built from plug ins. For many of these plug ins they build them to follow standards. Google recaptcha is a web standard. We don’t code this site ourselves. We have to use what others have previously built. That’s the reality of the web and technology sites even today.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
As a rookie I have no idea what this is all about and after reading some of the responses from people, I get a sense you seem to be behaving like Microsoft ( remember those people you are constantly criticizing about their approach to treating clients, lack of testing updates, giving them changes they did not ask for etc.
I ask the question – what happens if I just ignore the blue bar and neither opt in nor opt out? Do I still have access to Ask Woody. I have renewed my subscription for 2021 but if one day I lose contact so be it. It’s difficult enough to wrestle with Microsoft Windows 10 but not with those people you hope will be your source of assistance.
bsqrd
Unlike Microsoft I’m giving you a choice If you make no selection at all it doesn’t block you from the site. The goal of this is to ensure I have better information about what’s going on with the site to better protect it. This is a change to make it better for you. My intention with being honest/up front/clear about your choices was to not be like Microsoft and instead give you options.
Other sites track and don’t give you choice. I didn’t want to do that because I know that many of you want to opt out.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
The Google analytics choice banner has been appearing for several days as soon as I open to askwoody (prior to log in) For what its worth its at the very top. I click NO WAY every time , yet it is back the next time I come back. I suspect this is because I have FF clear all cookies and history at close. Are you going to make this permanent? Is it possible for them(You?) to set a super cookie that won’t be deleted or is that just skuttlebutt?
My subscription is coming due soon and I would like to know if you are going to keep this as a possibility before I re-up.
Thanks!
DriftyDon: ” My subscription is coming due soon and I would like to know if you are going to keep this as a possibility before I re-up. ”
My Plus subscription ended today because of a mix-up with my payment that I’m told will be taken care of soon and, as a result, that blue banner is no longer showing up on my browser’s window.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
@oscarcp, did the blue banner disappear for you during the time that your subscription was expired, and did it reappear once your subscription got sorted out and reactivated?
I’m getting the blue banner whether I’m signed in or not. Fortunately, in most cases it sits at the bottom of the Web page, so I see it only if I happen to scroll down that far.
Cybertooth,
I did not see the blue bar then but I do see it now .
I think that the reason for the blue bar appearing now, is that I deleted the cookie once more last time, after I closed the browser.
[Moderator Edit] please stay on topic
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
Is it possible for them(You?) to set a super cookie that won’t be deleted or is that just skuttlebutt?
There is no such thing as a cookie that persists after you have cleared all.
The banner returns because you clear all your cookies. If you retained cookies for AskWoody you would remain logged in and the banner would never return (and you would not be tracked).
Cookies can be used for good.
cheers, Paul
When you say “…no such thing as a cookie that persists….” I am assuming you are responding to my use of the term supercookie.
FYI
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/01/26/supercookie-protections/
I am sure you are familiar with supercookies, so were not implying “..no such thing…” Right?
I suspect this is because I have FF clear all cookies and history at close
DriftyDon – I have FF set to clear all cookies at close, but I also use CookieQuickMnager to lock the cookies such as those that identify me to AW. Thus, they are still there when I next restart FF. Cookies on my terms, not those of the trackers.
Dell E5570 Latitude, Intel Core i5 6440@2.60 GHz, 8.00 GB - Win 10 Pro
Yes and yes.
Yes for the first question. I don’t see a banner for the second question
I don’t see a banner for the second question
Do you really need a ‘No Personal Data is Collected’ banner?
What information do you keep?
The bare minimum necessary to keep the site running. We automatically keep things like your IP address, browser info, operating system, and the date and time you accessed the site. We also store your email address (see below). We only use this to see how many people visit our site and from where, and we will never use it to track or identify you. We will only keep other information if you want us to keep it, and we will keep it for as long as you want us to. Passwords are salted and encrypted (which means even if somebody stole them, they wouldn’t be able to read them). We don’t keep any financial information. More info.
How many sites display such a banner?
Perhaps you could provide an example URL or three?
Google recaptcha is a web standard.
WEB Standard ? De facto GOOGLE standard maybe but not to my liking as I have to change browsers to deal with them! JUST DO NOT USE THEM !!
That policy is in the FAQ of the site.
Many people don’t wade through pages of policies. A banner can say it all.
IMO would it not have been a much better idea to have asked first if GA was acceptable to the majority of AW members before just putting it on the site? I use FF and this “at the bottom/at the top” and all the additional questions it has raised has been far from simple. Every time I use AW it is a lottery as to what I’ll get. I think GA is playing with my FF add ons in a way that I have not seen before i.e. some time on and sometimes off. I have to reload the site to have the add ons operate in the on position. For the sake of simplicity please remove GA from AW. Keep the site lean, mean and simple; it was just fine the way it was.
Google analytics is the defacto gold standard of providing information for web properties ergo why I put it in place but made sure I gave you choices. I got my answers and it’s now disabled. I was trying to see if there was patterns to the spam to better protect the site. I got a few insights to help in blocking.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
Gaming Google Analytics
From time to time we help nonprofit museum curators develop exhibition webpages (free of charge) and many of their activities are funded by charitable trusts and similar organizations.
The funders and museum boards of directors are always interested in exhibition attendance, book sales, and webpage viewership. And their web page viewership interests range from the number of visitors to their geographic distribution.
As a result, we use Google Analytics to track web viewership.
While we to not let the host institutions or their staffs know, we make regular visits to their exhibition/program/book sales webpages and encourage others to do the same.
When we visit their web pages, we do it from over 30 PC via a VPN with over 5,500 servers located in nearly 60 countries. Of the servers, over 2,500 are in the United States and Canada and another 400 in the UK.
Obviously, we cannot influence the analytics related to exhibition payed attendance and physical book sales. But they do get incredible web page results with respect to numbers of clicks and geographic distribution of those clicks.
Food for thought for users of Google Analytics.
A supercookie is different. Clearing your browsing data doesn’t help.
I’m not sure who you are speaking to @ b but that was essentially what I was asking. Things change so fast! and GA would be a likely suspect to develop one that would persist. Glad Susan decided to remove it. I had my ‘google ‘ removed months ago and feel SOOOO much better!
From Wikipedia:
In late 2014, it became known that Verizon Wireless uses deep packet inspection for server-side insertion of a customer-unique ID field (“X-UIDH”) into all unencrypted HTTP headers. The mechanism has been referred to as “supercookie” or “perma-cookie”
This is very simple to defeat, it’s called HTTPS.
cheers, Paul
I’m not sure who you are speaking to @ b but that was essentially what I was asking. Things change so fast! and GA would be a likely suspect to develop one that would persist. Glad Susan decided to remove it. I had my ‘google ‘ removed months ago and feel SOOOO much better!
see Martin Brinkmann:
https://www.ghacks.net/2020/12/28/are-you-protected-against-online-tracking-the-effs-cover-your-tracks-site-has-the-answer/
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Notifications