Dear All
I
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear, but widespread attacks make patching prudent. Go ahead and patch, but watch out for potential problems. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
Home » Forums » AskWoody support » Productivity software by function » MS Access and database help » Back end data table question (Access 2K)
Hans
Thanks for the suggestion, that’s one all to obvious solution I’d overlooked……
My concern is that it may be possible for some one to leave the database open all night, so when the ‘first’ user logs on and their front end detects the updated Excel files it will not be able to overwrite the old tables. This was one of the reasons for me looking at the idea of using two queries, a delete and an append. While this will mean more complexity I think it may be a more reliable method? So, are there any pitfalls I should avoid by using the query methods?
Thanks
Ian
Hans
Nope, no links. Whether this is good practice or not I’m uncertain but I tend to try and avoid table level links, unless absolutely necessary, and only link tables at the query stage.
I’ve now got the query method working, just got to work out the ‘Timer’ instruction to create a two minute delay if the ‘file in use’ error (error 1004) is generated. I’m most of the way there now, thanks for the help.
btw,my two minute delay is based on the longest time I’ve recorded the update taking, plus 200 percent, that should keep the code out of trouble.
Ian
Hans
Nope, no links. Whether this is good practice or not I’m uncertain but I tend to try and avoid table level links, unless absolutely necessary, and only link tables at the query stage.
I’ve now got the query method working, just got to work out the ‘Timer’ instruction to create a two minute delay if the ‘file in use’ error (error 1004) is generated. I’m most of the way there now, thanks for the help.
btw,my two minute delay is based on the longest time I’ve recorded the update taking, plus 200 percent, that should keep the code out of trouble.
Ian
Hans
Thanks for the suggestion, that’s one all to obvious solution I’d overlooked……
My concern is that it may be possible for some one to leave the database open all night, so when the ‘first’ user logs on and their front end detects the updated Excel files it will not be able to overwrite the old tables. This was one of the reasons for me looking at the idea of using two queries, a delete and an append. While this will mean more complexity I think it may be a more reliable method? So, are there any pitfalls I should avoid by using the query methods?
Thanks
Ian
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.