• Core i7 laptop slower than Core i5?

    Author
    Topic
    #480421

    I got a refurbished laptop (HP dv7-4183cl) with Windows 7. It was snappy and fast. Unfortunately it had hardware problems and HP very generously replaced it with a bigger, better, faster (I thought) laptop, a dv7-6199us.

    The first laptop had a Core i5-460M processor (2.53GHz) with 2 cores and 6GB of RAM. The new one has a Core i7-2670QM (2.2GHz) with 4 cores and 8GB of RAM.

    I never had them side-by-side so I couldn’t do any careful comparisons, but the new Core i7 laptop is noticeably, significantly more sluggish than the Core i5. The first laptop felt snappy and responsive, but the new one feels slow. Boot-up takes longer, starting up processes takes longer, and virtual machines in VMware Workstation are really slow.

    The native speed of the Core i7 is 13% slower, but a) it feels more than 13% slower, and b) I assumed the slower clock rate would be compensated by improved architecture in the i7. Apparently not.

    The i7 has more cores but even though I’m a power user — I typically have 15-20 apps running including 2-4 VMs running in VMware — I seldom have 4 cores cranking at more than 10-20%. The CPUs are slackin’. I have no idea why it feels so slow.

    I *do* push things RAM-wise. Right now Task Manager says I’m using 6.85GB out of my 8, and presumably Windows has grabbed the rest of it. But I don’t think RAM could be the issue, because e.g. boot-up seems slow too.

    What could cause an i7 quad-core to feel more sluggish than an i5 dual-core?
    Gary

    Viewing 37 reply threads
    Author
    Replies
    • #1309802

      Have you used a tool such as Autoruns or WhatInStartup to examine and manage what is starting when you boot the system?

      Have you used a tool such as Process Explorer to examine what is running on your system?

      Are all the drivers on the system up-to-date?

      Do you have Windows 7 SP1 installed? Are all the Windows patches and hotfixes installed?

      Joe

      --Joe

      • #1309806

        Autoruns says there’s a ton of stuff — possibly lots more than the old laptop, but hard to tell. But the CPU usage is very low and the RAM usage is low until I load up my tons of apps. So I wouldn’t expect that to be the problem.

        Procexp currently shows 165 processes running. Like Task Manager, it shows only about 10% CPU usage. Resource Monitor shows very little disk or network activity.

        The system is running Win7 SP1, fully patched. I can’t guarantee all the drivers are running the latest — I’d have to chase that somewhere, probably on the HP site.

    • #1309805

      even though I’m a power user — I typically have 15-20 apps running including 2-4 VMs running in VMware

      This is not conducive to speed. Tone it down a bit.

      • #1309807

        This is not conducive to speed. Tone it down a bit.

        Help me understand why? If the CPU is not busy, and there’s RAM available, why should multiple apps cause an issue?

        Obviously when I’m pushing the RAM limits, e.g. with my VMs, then I’m going to create swapping. But until I get to that point, I understood there was no significantpenalty for running multiple programs. If I doubled my RAM to 16GB so I was nowhere near running out of RAM, would my performance still suffer from running lots of stuff?

    • #1309810

      You mentioned bootup taking longer. You should refer to the Logon tab in Autoruns. That may give you an idea about what you could disable to improve the boot time. You could also install Soluto if you want a program to help diagnose the boot process.

      Even when your CPU and RAM usage is not heavy you could still have other issues such as a slower disk drive, non or slow responding network devices, faulty RAM, or out-of-date drivers. All of these could contribute to a system being sluggish.

      Joe

      --Joe

    • #1309817

      What Joe said in the last paragraph…would only add that you cannot go the “power user” route on a laptop spec’ed with a 1 TB, 5400 RPM drive…can’t even run one VM with any kind of proficiency and still have the host loaded up with active apps, much less 2 or 4. Its not the processor slowing you down…that’s why its only 10-20% utilized…everything else is slowing you down; utilization starvation I call it…everything has to balance; one weak link and you get bottlenecked.

    • #1309827

      I’d also be willing to bet that your GPU would be an issue in terms of “bottle necking” as well.
      Laptop’s should not be run like you are doing.

      • #1309865

        Yeah, I wasn’t crazy about the 5400rpm drive. But that should only be an issue if you’re *using* it. Obviously that will make a difference during bootup, but not during normal usage unless I’m swapping or running some disk-intensive app, yes?

        I wonder how much difference a 1TB 7200rpm drive would make? They’re only $70-80. I could do an image backup of this 1TB drive, swap in the new one, and restore the image. Of course that would invalidate my warranty so maybe I’ll wait a while before I seriously consider that.

        I don’t think the GPU is an issue. procexp says it’s running at about 2-3% most of the time.

        So if the CPU and disk aren’t busy, and the GPU is basically unused, and there’s enough RAM to avoid swapping… whereinheck IS the bottleneck? My disk activity light doesn’t seem to work — says it’s always parked — but the Resource Monitor says it’s not terribly busy most of the time.

        The only indicator of a problem I can find is the page fault rate. System Monitor says it runs around 5000/sec with the system just sitting here not doing much. That seems excessive. And Task Manager says the PF delta is generally running under 1000. !?

        I’m a bit dismayed to hear “a laptop can’t/shouldn’t be used like that.” I did all this with a smaller/slower Vista laptop for years. I always had severe RAM limitations (4GB, 32bit) but other than that it worked great. As the install got a few years old it got “Windows bit rot” and slowed down a lot, but as I recall the last re-install pepped it up again just fine. So if that 2.0GHz Turion 64×2 with 4GB and Vista could do it, why can’t a bigger/faster box with Win7?

    • #1309880

      I don’t think anyone is saying the performance you are getting is normal, something definitely seems wrong, my guess would be one or more very poorly performing drivers, thinking chipset maybe or if the pagefile is not set to system managed, sometimes I’ve fixed a slow system by merely allowing Windows to manage it. Hard to say for sure, I think we’re all guessing a bit (lot?).

    • #1309929

      I got a refurbished laptop (HP dv7-4183cl) with Windows 7. It was snappy and fast. Unfortunately it had hardware problems and HP very generously replaced it with a bigger, better, faster (I thought) laptop, a dv7-6199us.

      Is this a clean install to the newer laptop, or was the HD cloned from the 1st one to the new laptop’s HD?
      Better hardware doesn’t necessarily equate to better performance if the drivers are corrupt or the os install shoddy.

      I would also be curious to know what is showing up in the event veiwer.

      • #1309949

        The OS install is the factory install from HP, plus my updates/patches and installed applications.

        I haven’t done anything with the pagefile so I assume it’s still system managed.

        Nothing significant in the Event Log. Prior to the past week there were a bunch of SmartCard errors and WudfUsbccidDrv errors, which I think are also related to the smartcard. Until last week I had a login-token smartcard plugged in, and apparently that caused errors. I plugged it in again this morning and so far no errors.

        I guess the next step is to go through the list of drivers at the HP support site and see if any are out of date. I tried their automatic scanner and it couldn’t find any HP products…:rolleyes:

    • #1309952

      Be sure to check for BIOS and motherboard updates too.

      Joe

      --Joe

      • #1309959

        It looks like MOST of my drivers are out of date. HP has released drivers for most devices in the last 3 months. I’ve got the BIOS update but I don’t think there’s a chipset driver update.

        I’m a little unclear which drivers to install on some of these. Apparently HP used several different vendors’ components in this specific laptop, and they provide drivers for all of them. It’s up to you to figure out which one your laptop needs. E.g. they have Intel and Ralink Bluetooth drivers; currently the system has Microsoft generic Bluetooth drivers installed so I don’t know which one is appropriate. They also have Intel and Ralink wifi drivers, but currently the system has an Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030 driver so I assume the Intel one is right. Will it hurt anything if I install the wrong one?

        There’s an Intel Rapid Storage Technology Driver. Not sure if this is needed. Device Manager says I have a Toshiba drive but this Intel driver isn’t just a disk driver.

        Is there a better way to see what’s currently installed, other than Device Manager?

        • #1310000

          Is there any reference to TurboCache or HyperMemory, which ‘steal memory’ from RAM to use for graphics, in the specifications? Maybe I have the wrong kind of ‘Turbo’ – I was looking over machines in a store today and ‘Turbo’ seemed to figure prominently in their advertised specs.

          As for having all those cores, Ashampoo has an application called Core Tuner (now at 2) which you can get a free trial for if you are feeling adventurous or are just curious. I’m curious: I have it on one computer and can’t figure out what’s going on with it, much less whether or not it’s doing me any good, but I have fewer cores than you.

        • #1310001

          It looks like MOST of my drivers are out of date. HP has released drivers for most devices in the last 3 months. I’ve got the BIOS update but I don’t think there’s a chipset driver update.

          Is there a better way to see what’s currently installed, other than Device Manager?

          Windows 7 has a built in tool that will identify all your hardware components so you can download the correct drivers. Open your Start Menu and type msinfo32.exe and press your Enter key when you see it highlighted in the search return list.

          If you want a tool that has a friendlier user interface, check out his SevenForums tutorial and download for SystemInfo.exe.

          And SIW (System Information for Windows) is also a good tool, but may provide more information than you care to view.

    • #1310003

      Remove Old Drivers After Upgrading to New Hardware

      The above link may also prove helpfull cleaning up older/outdated drivers.

    • #1310005

      You might be thinking of the Intel TurboBoost Technology, which is just a way for the processor to crank up its clock speed temporarily. That’s the only “turbo” mentioned in the specs for this laptop.

    • #1310011

      I would hope there aren’t any terribly outdated drivers on it. This laptop is literally 4 weeks old, straight from the manufacturer.

      Is there any reference to TurboCache or HyperMemory, which ‘steal memory’ from RAM to use for graphics, in the specifications? Maybe I have the wrong kind of ‘Turbo’ –

      Maybe you’re thinking of Intel Turbo Boost Technology? That’s basically just a way for the processor to crank up its clock speed temporarily. That’s the only “Turbo” in the specs of this laptop.

      Thanks Deadeye, I’ll see if msinfo32 helps me figure out the drivers I need.

      • #1310270

        Maybe you’re thinking of Intel Turbo Boost Technology? That’s basically just a way for the processor to crank up its clock speed temporarily. That’s the only “Turbo” in the specs of this laptop.

        Yes, that must be it. The other kind they don’t advertise, I suspect, although they have a name for them. And I don’t know that they are even still around but it’s possible they are. Thank you for ringing that bell for me.

        The one thing that nags me is that both(?) old and new computers were rebuilds, weren’t they? One may have been souped up by the previous owner and left in an ‘improved’ state before being remarketed by the maker, who simply fixed what was wrong with it. That, at least, is a plausible explanation.

    • #1310200

      Well, msinfo32 doesn’t help much. It’s hard to tell which of the options available on the HP website correspond to drivers listed in msinfo32. Plus msinfo32 lists a lot of things that “shouldn’t” be there — such as a Broadcom NetXtreme driver. I don’t have one of those, according to Device Manager. I’m guessing a lot of things are installed “just in case.” But that means it’s hard to tell what’s actually needed and what I should install.

      Guess I’ll just try dropping in the things from the website that look right….!!

    • #1310211

      There is always the clean install option available to you.

    • #1310224

      Well, I could revert to the HP factory image, but that would put me right back where I started.

      I don’t have a full install disk, unfortunately. And if possible I’d rather avoid starting from scratch again…

    • #1310227

      You should be able to download a Windows 7 64, bit SP-1 ISO file directly from MS for free and make some alterations that would alow you to use your own product key.
      This would be the ultimate clean install.

      Otherwise it looks like your going to be methodically hunting down drivers and software for an explanation to this sluggish behavior.

    • #1310237

      I wouldn’t mind hunting them down if I had some idea how to look for them… I don’t know any way to tell if a driver needs updating. Only thing I know to do is to look at the list on the HP website for this laptop and say “No, I don’t think I have that, yes, I’ve got that one.”

      I installed every updated driver that seemed to make sense: BIOS, BIOS UEFI, IDTHDaudio, Intel CPT (chipset), AMD Graphics (Intel graphics said my system didn’t qualify even though Device Manager says I have Radeon HD6770M *and* Intel HD Graphics), Realtek LAN, Intel Wifi, Intel IME, Synaptics touchpad, SimplePass, Validity Fingerprint, HP Software Framework, Renesas USB hub, and some recommended Windows patches.

      I’m not quite sure what to do from here.

      I didn’t realize you could download full installers from MS. I’ll keep that in mind.

    • #1310265

      It seems manufacturers and a lot of “fluff” to their software lineups on new PC’s (I am attempting to be politically correct and use parental control of myself here when I say “fluff”). Most of this “fluff” is totally not needed. When I upgraded our PC’s to Win 7 (SonyVaio) I chose NOT to add the Sony “fluff” (Win 7 and Sony “fluff” were on 2 separate disks for the upgrade.) The PC’s work just fine, and in fact better than they did prior to ridding myself of this “fluff”.

      A couple of things I would do:

      1) Try PC Decrapifier(I’m not kidding, that’s the name) This app helps clear out “fluff” and trial versions.

      2) Download the Win 7 iso file including SP1 from Digital Riverand use a generic version of Win 7 to reinstall your OS. This route would require reinstallation of all your apps, but would give you a pristine installation.

      Either route may help solve some of your problems.

    • #1310273

      Try PC Decrapifier (I’m not kidding, that’s the name)

      What do you think the first C in CCleaner stands for Ted? 😀

      Its true, the only HP I purchased recently (a refurb) was so loaded with “C” it was significantly slower than my other “home loaded” systems, not to the point where I thought there was something major wrong but I didn’t have time to go on a “C” hunt (at least not that kind :p), so I blasted it with a new copy and its been running great ever since.

    • #1310318

      Dogberry, I’ve talked about 3 laptops:
      1) my old Vista laptop
      2) the refurb HP w/ i5 that had problems & got replaced
      3) the factory-new HP w/ i7

      Both 2 and 3 had HP factory W7 installs. 2 was snappy and fast, 3 isn’t.

      Ted and Infinicore, there is definitely a lot of HP “fluff” on this system. If I’d had any idea this would be a problem, I would have figured out a way to do a clean generic install from the start. I may yet have to, but man, I really don’t want to have to start from scratch again… Plus I wonder what it will take to get specific hardware like the fingerprint reader working again. I guess I could go back to the HP site for those, even if I was running on a bare W7 install.

      It also seems very odd that #2 was fast and #3 isn’t, even though both of them have a “C”-filled HP install. Not the SAME HP install, but with many of the same “features.”

      But something is definitely not optimal here. I’ve just updated every driver I can find, I’m currently using only 5.2 of my 8GB, no significant CPU or disk activity… and yet even simple typing and scrolling is noticeably sluggish. The character input or scrolling hesitates every few seconds. It’s crazy-making, and I don’t remember it doing that before I updated the drivers. Performance Monitor says I’m getting 5-10,000 page faults per second, and 10-15,000 interrupts per second, when I’m doing almost nothing. I had a few applications running that stream data off the network. I closed those, and after spiking to over 1M/sec for about 30 seconds, the page faults dropped to about 3-6,000/sec. I closed every single application except Performance Monitor and the Firefox I’m typing this into, and I still see 1-5,000 PF/sec. Is that normal!?

      I closed every tray application I could, and PFs dropped below 100/sec. Interrupts are still around 3000/sec. So apparently some of my trap apps are causing more PFs than it should.

      But even with all of them gone and PFs under 100/sec, I still notice brief hesitations when I type and scroll. So apparently that’s not the cause of the problem. What is going on!? Is there some other metric I should look at?

    • #1310319

      Dogberry, I’ve talked about 3 laptops:
      1) my old Vista laptop
      2) the refurb HP w/ i5 that had problems & got replaced
      3) the factory-new HP w/ i7

      Both 2 and 3 had HP factory W7 installs. 2 was snappy and fast, 3 isn’t.

      Ted and Infinicore, there is definitely a lot of HP “fluff” on this system. If I’d had any idea this would be a problem, I would have figured out a way to do a clean generic install from the start. I may yet have to, but man, I really don’t want to have to start from scratch again… Plus I wonder what it will take to get specific hardware like the fingerprint reader working again. I guess I could go back to the HP site for those, even if I was running on a bare W7 install.

      It also seems very odd that #2 was fast and #3 isn’t, even though both of them have a “C”-filled HP install. Not the SAME HP install, but with many of the same “features.”

      But something is definitely not optimal here. I’ve just updated every driver I can find, I’m currently using only 5.2 of my 8GB, no significant CPU or disk activity… and yet even simple typing and scrolling is noticeably sluggish. The character input or scrolling hesitates every few seconds. Videos pause every few seconds. It’s crazy-making, and I’m sure it didn’t do that before I updated the drivers.

      Performance Monitor says I’m getting 5-10,000 page faults per second, and 10-15,000 interrupts per second, when I’m doing almost nothing. I had a few applications running that stream data off the network. I closed those, and after spiking to over 1M/sec for about 30 seconds, the page faults dropped to about 3-6,000/sec. I closed every single application except Performance Monitor and the Firefox I’m typing this into, and I still see 1-5,000 PF/sec. Is that normal!?

      I closed every tray application I could, and PFs dropped below 100/sec. Interrupts are still around 3000/sec. So apparently some of my trap apps are causing more PFs than it should.

      But even with all of them gone and PFs under 100/sec, I still notice brief hesitations when I type and scroll, and videos are still hanging every few seconds. So apparently that’s not the cause of the problem. What is going on!? Is there some other metric I should look at?

      • #1310371

        Dogberry, I’ve talked about 3 laptops:
        1) my old Vista laptop
        2) the refurb HP w/ i5 that had problems & got replaced
        3) the factory-new HP w/ i7

        Both 2 and 3 had HP factory W7 installs. 2 was snappy and fast, 3 isn’t.

        I had something more modest in mind, such as the previous owner of the ‘snappy and fast’ refurb having added RAM or something, but I now see that you have covered that above. (HP might have left it as it was and simply replaced the power supply, for example. The fact that it ‘had problems’ might even have been attributable to whatever it was that was making it snappy and fast.) If it’s any consolation, I have a dual-core HP that can run rings around a year younger HP triple-core that is the same series, at least in terms of startup time, but I think I have a lot less software on it.

        This is an academic question, but where does a user normally expect to see gains from having more cores?

    • #1310372

      More cores benefit you when you’re running multiple CPU-hungry applications. Each core looks like a “CPU” to the apps. If you have one CPU, all your apps have to share it. If you have a dual-core, then there are two “CPUs” for your apps to run on.

      It’s a little more complicated than that, since there are two threads (execution streams) supported on each i5 / i7 core, but you get the idea…

    • #1310410

      Official Windows 7 SP1 ISO from Digital River

      Can I use OEM Windows 7 HP product key to install 64-bit OS off of retail disc?

      LEGAL Windows 7 Download Links (Just like Vista before!!!)

      Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool

      Above are the links for downloading legitimate Windows 7 iso copies, and some extra info if it should be required for OEM types.
      As a power user myself, I have never been satisfied with the type of OEM reinstallation or recovery options offered. A pristine clean
      install is alway prefered, especially with a new or even refurbished laptop.

    • #1310416

      Thanks, CLiNT. I wish I didn’t have to — especially after I just spent a couple of weeks setting the @%?! thing up!! — but it looks like it might be necessary… good project over Christmas break. 🙂

      Wish I could boost it to Win7 Pro while I’m at it, but I’m sure my key only works for Home Premium. And I doubt it’s worth paying for an upgrade.

      EDIT: From your second link, it sounds like installing generic Win7 with an OEM license key is problematic at best. Or is it your experience that an OEM key will work fine with the official Win7 ISO?

    • #1310440

      Some have had great success with their OEM keys, some have had to contact MS to activate. It’s hard to say. I have had to call MS twic e for similar problems and this was very easy in my case.

    • #1310490

      I mentioned Ashampoo Core Tuner 2 in an earlier post, and I suggest that you download a trial. The free trial is fully functional, and the program may tell you more than most of us ever wanted to know about what is going on with the cores in our processors. It will even let you tweak things to suit yourself. You may find it a lot more fun than a system reinstall. I find it daunting but I haven’t really studied it, but with your knowledge, you might learn a lot from it in a short time.

    • #1310686

      I’ll look at Core Tuner 2, but that sounds like it optimizes the use of multiple cores by distributing processes among them. That’s not my problem. The cores are all loafing.

      I’m definitely going to have to reinstall W7. It’s significantly worse than it was before I upgraded my drivers. The jerky/pausing typing and videos have gone away (for the moment at least, I just rebooted). But I was just working, pushing the system hard as I usually do. I was using almost 7GB of my available 8. When I use too much, I know it will start to slow down drastically because it’s thrashing. But it got so almost nothing was working — even after I exited several of my largest processes. Task Manager showed only 4 GB in use, almost no CPU use, and still the remaining processes were mostly locked up with spinning cursors and “not available” grayed-out windows. It took me about 10-15 minutes to shut things down enough to safely reboot. 🙁

    • #1310689

      I looked at Core Tuner 2. It looks like it optimizes the use of multiple cores by distributing processes among them, by setting processor affinity. That’s not my problem. The cores are all loafing.

      While I was getting Ashampoo I followed one of their ad links to SysTweak’s Advanced Driver Updater. It claimed it found 9 out-of-date drivers, but some of them (e.g. Intel Motherboard Resources driver) aren’t on the HP website and I can’t find them. Of course if I buy the product for $30 they’ll be happy to tell me where it is.

      I’m definitely going to have to reinstall W7. It’s significantly worse than it was before I upgraded my drivers. The jerky/pausing typing and videos have gone away (for the moment at least, I just rebooted). But I was working this afternoon, pushing the system hard as I usually do. I was using almost 7GB of my available 8. When I use too much, I know it will start to slow down drastically because it’s thrashing. But it got so almost nothing was working — even after I exited several processes and freed up RAM. Task Manager showed only 4 GB in use, almost no CPU activity, and still the remaining processes were mostly locked up with spinning cursors and “not available” grayed-out windows. It took me about 10-15 minutes to shut things down enough to safely reboot. 🙁 That’s the way my old Vista laptop performed, which was a lot of why I got a new laptop. I’m not willing to accept that kind of performance with a brand-new higher-performance box.

      • #1310704

        I looked at Core Tuner 2. It looks like it optimizes the use of multiple cores by distributing processes among them, by setting processor affinity. That’s not my problem. The cores are all loafing.

        Well, it was worth a try, anyway, and the price was right. It is one program I have that has a ‘geeks only’ look to it, and since you are running ‘high end’ I thought you might be able to figure it out, which you seem to have done. Thank you for the interpretation.

        As for driver finders, it is my impression that users steer away from them, and they almost invariably report far more drivers than you are likely to need. In fact if something is wrong, the odds are that it will be a single driver, not a dozen.

        Good luck with the reinstall. HP didn’t give you a restore set did they? For my HP machines you just hit a key – I think it’s F11 – and the computer will restore itself to the factory configuration. It’s available on every new HP machine – just watch for the options on the the boot screen.

        • #1312309

          I have the same problem. I just upgraded from a Thinkpad T61p with 3GB RAM running a Core2Duo 2.4 MHz CPU on 32-bit XP SP3 to a W510 Thinkpad with 8 GB RAM running a Corei7 2 GHz X920 CPU on Win7 SP1 64-bit. Without a doubt, the old XP machine was faster. This new Thinkpad is very sluggish, often I can type faster than it can put up the characters.

          What the @#$@#$#@ is going on? This machine should be much faster, with a much more recent current gen CPU, more than double the RAM, and a 10-year-more-recent OS. Yet the Win7 machine is like a big slug. The hourglass comes up constantly. CPU usage on Task Manager is never more than a few %, RAM usage is nowhere near my full 8 GB (usually it is 3 or so). Both Thinkpads have 7200 HDs (not SSD).

          I ran Windows update to update every available update, as well as the Lenovo utilities which upgraded all drivers (10 newer drivers were found, including a BIOS upgrade).

          Any ideas? I want to go back to my boring old XP! This reminds me of the upgrade to Vista on my desktop machine…..

          • #1312341

            I have the same problem. .

            Any ideas? I want to go back to my boring old XP! This reminds me of the upgrade to Vista on my desktop machine…..

            One or two ideas leap out at me. Three GB is a mammoth amount of RAM for XP, and you have gone from 32 bit to 64 bit. The 10-year more recent system is correspondingly more complex, but I think the consensus is that it is the single most stable system MS has yet produced, and I suspect I will cling to it the way you are clinging to XP.

            That being said, I completely agree that something is seriously wrong. I have had two different computers that ran Win 7 Ultimate 32 bit with one GB of RAM, admittely as an experiment, one of which now has two GB and runs perfectly well with it. I can’t recall ever having seen an hourglass with Win 7, but that may have been blindness on my part.

            The best idea is the standard: your computer must be under warranty, there really is something wrong with it, and I suggest you make it a warranty call as soon as possible.

    • #1312392

      One thing you can do to speed up your PC is to get rid of the eye candy. In windows 7, go into advanced System Settings (type advanced system setting in the start orb search box) and click on the settings button under system performance. On the Visual Effects tab, set “Adjust for best performance” and click OK. Alternatively, select custom and uncheck all the animation, transparent glass, fade, and translucent items. Your Pc won’t be quite as pretty but should run significantly faster.

      Jerry

      • #1312396

        It’s a little better, I selected the “best performance” option, which turned off every option in that dialog box. Without question it is snappier, although a lot uglier. Fonts are hilariously 90’s. However, hourglass still comes up a lot. I also went to a non-Aero “basic” Win7 theme.

        My desktop is a 4GB RAM Core2Duo 6420 OC’ed to 3GHz with Win7 64-bit installed on an 80 GB SSD. It is lightning fast despite the older gen CPU, and half the RAM. I realize much of that performance comes from the SSD, but still, once files are loaded into RAM, the laptop should not be impacted by the old-style Hard drive.

        Am now upgrading the Nvidia Quadro FX drivers on the laptop, although the ones I had weren’t that old. Am running out of things to do. Just like the OP stated, the laptop is acting like it is loafing. When I select an option, it’s like it has to get off the couch to fulfill the request. Even doing something simple like email, any menu option starts with the hourglass before the drop-down list. Something is seriously wrong…..

        DD.

        • #1312399

          It’s a little better, I selected the “best performance” option, which turned off every option in that dialog box. Without question it is snappier, although a lot uglier. Fonts are hilariously 90’s. However, hourglass still comes up a lot. I also went to a non-Aero “basic” Win7 theme.

          My desktop is a 4GB RAM Core2Duo 6420 OC’ed to 3GHz with Win7 64-bit installed on an 80 GB SSD. It is lightning fast despite the older gen CPU, and half the RAM. I realize much of that performance comes from the SSD, but still, once files are loaded into RAM, the laptop should not be impacted by the old-style Hard drive.

          Am now upgrading the Nvidia Quadro FX drivers on the laptop, although the ones I had weren’t that old. Am running out of things to do. Just like the OP stated, the laptop is acting like it is loafing. When I select an option, it’s like it has to get off the couch to fulfill the request. Even doing something simple like email, any menu option starts with the hourglass before the drop-down list. Something is seriously wrong…..

          DD.

          I’d probably do a backup, full image, and then do a full windows clean install with a disk reformat. I have seen laptops look totally different beasts, performance wise, just with a clean, manufacturer bloat free install.

          The image backup is important, to allow you to go back if you ever decide that is the best way. You can also try and download the Win7 drivers from the manufacturers website before hand, but I trust Windows will find most of them without issues.

          • #1312402

            I doubt I’ll be able to do that, this is a company-provided laptop with the mandatory image. For info, the XP laptop was as well, with the same level of security. It’s not Win7 I am blaming it on, I have no idea what to blame it on (yet). When I first installed Vista on a desktop machine years ago, I remember the same type of behaviour. It was caused by the endless checking for User Access control, and Vista never really improved. I have UAC turned on on my desktop, and it shows zero slowdown as a result. So still unsure what it is, but it is very very sluggish. There is a lag regardless of what option I choose.

            • #1312446

              I doubt I’ll be able to do that, this is a company-provided laptop with the mandatory image. For info, the XP laptop was as well, with the same level of security. It’s not Win7 I am blaming it on, I have no idea what to blame it on (yet). When I first installed Vista on a desktop machine years ago, I remember the same type of behaviour. It was caused by the endless checking for User Access control, and Vista never really improved. I have UAC turned on on my desktop, and it shows zero slowdown as a result. So still unsure what it is, but it is very very sluggish. There is a lag regardless of what option I choose.

              If it’s company-provided it’s a no-brainer. The company must have a systems administrator, and it’s his job to make them work. Period.

            • #1312543

              If it’s company-provided it’s a no-brainer. The company must have a systems administrator, and it’s his job to make them work. Period.

              Yeah….. the HelpDesk will simply re-image the laptop. I’ll do that if I get desperate, but I have put a fair number of hours getting it ready for use transitioning from my old laptop (and yes, it was slow before I changed a single thing). The latest nVidia drivers seemed to have helped, but not very much. The XP system was still snappier. What also helped is toning down UAC from the top selection to the next-one-down. Now it has stopped asking me for a password every time I change a system parameter. My Windows Experience is measuring 5.9, which seems quite good but that still doesn’t account for the hourglass coming up all the time. Even doing something simple like launching Control Panel brings it up. The system is definitely usable, but I am simply not seeing any improvement over my past system despite the markedly better specs.

              I’ll keep plugging away. I have even tried turning off 4 of the 8 cores to see if that made a difference (via the msconfig boot options tab). That appeared to make zero difference at all, which tells me that the 8 cores are not really being used efficiently. Am on to network issues now, trying to see if different MTUs improve things, wireless vs. wired, etc. I am convinced there must be some contention surrounding the 8 cores, some delay when the OS decides to which core it assigns a thread. Just a guess, but something along those lines. Any other suggestions appreciated.

    • #1312398

      I take back what I said about never having seen an hourglass – I have seen one (briely) since I posted. Eye candy will slow a Win 7 computer, but with those specs it is a drop in the bucket. Something is very wrong with that computer or setup, and it is sad to see someone having that much trouble and blaming it on Windows 7. There are users who would love to have something even close to those specs but who are doing very well indeed with Win 7.

    • #1312403

      You could try Resource Monitor, to check what is using CPU, RAM and disk. I would probably think the disk and graphics adapter would be the most likely problem sources…

    • #1312405

      There are users who would love to have something even close to those specs but who are doing very well indeed with Win 7.

      Indeed, I have a 1.67 GHz single core processor with an FX 5600 graphics card, running full aero glass, one gig of RAM and other than the obvious limits of a one core system (not much good for serious multitasking), it performs almost as well as XP.

      Which reminds me, have you checked the WEI and run a reassessment to see if any of the components are coming up short as far as the W7 testing goes?

    • #1312722

      Ah, I hate this new laptop! It is a complete slug. I can type faster than it puts up the characters in most applications! The hourglass comes up all the time. I have since learned that a corei7 is actually comprised of 4 physical cores and 4 virtual. Is there any way to turn off the 4 virtual cores? Maybe it is some sort of weird contention problem between cores. I am out of ideas, I can’t help thinking I should have ordered a Corei5 instead.

    • #1312788

      OK, looks like I have it working much better now. It was a long combination of things, but I am willing to bet disabling all the Bluetooth elements removed some interrupt contention. Fortunately, I don’t need bluetooth on this laptop. Changes made :

      1). Moved UAC down a notch from the company-preset highest setting to second setting.
      2). Turned off a long list of services (Adobe Acrobat Update Service, Nvidia 3D, Superfetch, Remote Desktop config, Fax, Wireless Bluetooth (2 services), ActiveX Installer, BES Client, Bluetooth support services, and Parental Controls.
      3). Removed all USB devices prior to boot (apparently there is a known loop with USB devices plugged in at boot which may cause perf issues).
      4). Disabled Bluetooth Software pre-load
      5). Upgraded to latest Nvidia drivers, disabled 3D Vision.
      6). Upgraded BIOS.
      7). Upgraded all drivers via Lenovo tool.
      8). Upgraded Win7 via Windows Update including all Optional Updates.
      9). Ran CCleaner.
      10). Turned off Aero, went to a basic Win7 theme.

      – I also tried a few things I reverted. I originally set to “Adjust for Best Performance” in Performance Options dialog box (Control Panel – System – Adjust Performance…) but Win7 ended up looking unacceptably ugly so switched back to “Adjust for Best Appearance”. There was a slight increase in perceived performance, but not enough to justify the ugliness.
      – Turning off 4 of the cores via msconfig – boot – advanced, but that had no discernible impact. Went back to 8.

      System is much snappier now, about what I had with XP. With the additional cores and RAM, I expect it will be quite a bit more stable. After I test this new config for a few days, I’ll turn Superfetch back on since in theory that should improve application loading performance and boot over time.

      DD.

    • #1312812

      To drop down to 4 cores from 8, you need to adjust the BIOS. The CPU runs HyperThreading – similar to the good old days of the Pentium 4 HT CPU’s. The number of cores referred to in msconfig is a debug setting for boot up.

      Drop down into the BIOS at boot up disable HT: the machine should show 4 cores, but might trip an activation request as it may appear to be a significant hardware change. No real issue – if it does trip the activation request, simply phone the number and re-activate.

      It may make a difference in some specialised circumstances, but in most cases will probably make little discernable difference – no harm in trying though!

    • #1312992

      Ahhhhhhhhhhh! It’s all my fault!

      I finally figured it out, and it was entirely my fault. All of the changes above did improve things, but the laptop seemed no faster than my previous XP laptop, so I was resigned to that being the best it could do despite the drastically upgraded hardware and much newer OS. I have a docking station for the old T61p laptop (XP machine) on a stand in my office. When I received the new laptop, I also replaced the docking station with a new one which fits a W510 Thinkpad, but I just used the same power adapter since the connector was identical. The cord was passed up behind my desk against the wall, so I just plugged in the old one since it was a pain to crawl under my desk to exchange them. After days of making changes, tweaks, etc., and yet another reboot, I needed to cold start the laptop. This time, a nice big message appeared on the screen “A power adapter with a lower wattage has been detected. Please use the power adapter which shipped with your laptop. Your laptop battery will charge at a slower rate and your computer will automatically lower the performance of your computer to adjust for the lower wattage.”

      Learn something new every day. The new brick is rated 135W 20V, the old one only 90W 20V. I switched bricks, and presto, snappy performance after my next boot. Doh!

    • #1329742

      wow this was very educative.
      Thanks for sharing

    • #1332978

      “I *do* push things RAM-wise. Right now Task Manager says I’m using 6.85GB out of my 8, and presumably Windows has grabbed the rest of it. But I don’t think RAM could be the issue, because e.g. boot-up seems slow too.”

      “Procexp currently shows 165 processes running.”

      Holy moley – you outta controley!!!

      Typical factory install OS always has too much crap running. You don’t need ALL of it all the time. Think “clean & lean = fast machine”. The most processes I get running on a strong laptop are 85 (I do LOTS of installs/reloads for people). Get the free version of REVO uninstaller and go to work with it. Forget tuners and tweakers, there are many that will just make things worse. Even with the good ones you have to be a good judge of when and where to use them.

      Because you don’t want to uninstall everything, just stop the useless 24/7 background processes. Use Anvir Task Manager Pro (free trial that lasts forever) and shut off as many ‘startups’ as you safely can.

      Wanna be a power user? You need a powerhouse of a computer. Best choices are among the desktops, laptops are marginal by comparison. You can’t move an 18 wheeler load very fast with a 4 wheeler sedan.

    • #1333004

      There is not that much crapware running on this laptop. There’s some, but not a lot. Trouble is that a lot of legitimate apps install stuff that runs in the background. E.g. I’m not running VMware Workstation right now, but there are FIVE VMware processes running. Adobe Acrobat, Skype, Snagit, Roboform, iTunes, printer, touchpad, all of them run a background process at all times. There are plenty of others. Add that to the heavy load I put on the system — I’m currently running 21 separate apps, including 7 Excel worksheets, 6 Word documents, 6 Powerpoint documents, Firefox with 17 open tabs, Thunderbird, several large applications, …. and the processes add up.

      Currently I’m using 6 of my 8 GB of RAM and 10% of CPU. But I never max out the CPUs — the cores are always loafing. RAM is a much bigger problem.

    Viewing 37 reply threads
    Reply To: Core i7 laptop slower than Core i5?

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information: